Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

@ Note: g.c. - guaranteed correction The minimum water discharge in the Laba river is usually observed at the end of the fall-winter low water period. Table 4.23 summarizes information on the characteristic mean daily and monthly water discharge, and Table 4.24 shows the parameters and computed values of the minimum water discharge. As seen from Table 4.23, the lowest daily water discharge falls to 2.20 m3/s. However, upon analysis of the reference materials on the daily water discharge in 1945 revealed that the discharge results were attributable to ice jam formation at the site between gauging stations at Burnoe and Kaladzhinskaya. Table 4.23 Characteristic Minimal Daily and Monthly Water Discharge in the Laba River Near Kaladzhinskaya Over the Entire Period of Observations Minimum Water Discharge Daily average Monthly average 22.0 41.5 m3/s Highest Date Average 13.2 19.4 Lowest m3/s Table 4.24 Parameters and Computed Values of Minimum Water Discharge in the Laba River Near Kaladzhins kaya Designation Daily average Monthly average Average Period of Observations, m3/s 13.3 19.4 7.1 1; 5-1 8.02, 1968 1979 Number of Years 49 60 CV 0.30 0.35 Cs lCv 4Cv 2.20 9.83 Computed Values of Minimum Discharge, m31s, Probability % 50 75 90 95 97 13.2 19.3 10.5 14.6 8.35 12.2 Date 25.02.1945 1939 7.14 11.0 6.4 10 PAGE 4-27
River Site La ba Kaladzhinskaya La ba Doguzhiev Malaya Laba Burnoe Bolshaya Laba Downstream of Aziatsky bridge Fars Chamlyk Dondukovskaya 1 Voznesenskaya Catch- ment Area, kmz 3370 12000 1090 1180 1 240 554 Table 4.25 Parameters of Annual Runoff Average Altitude of Catchment Basin 1600 730 1960 1970 400 590 Average for Long-Term Period Water Discharge (m3/s) 83.1 95.4 35.2 40.2 4.6 1.39 <strong>Volume</strong> (mln. m3/s) 2622 3009 1110 1268 145 43.8 Runoff Modulus 11s kmz 24.7 7.95 32.3 34.1 3.71 2.51 CV 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.16 0.40 0.40 Coeff. Cs 0.36 0.40 0.0 0.32 0.80 0.80 75% 2289 2580 947 1113 103 30.9 Annual Runoff of Various Probability, mln.m3 95% 1901 2094 709 956 65 19.6 97% 1814 1987 650 918 57 17.0 99% 1657 1788 540 848 44 13.2 a PAGE 4-28
Page 1 and 2:
Krasnodar GRES Project 86-33 7 Volu
Page 3 and 4:
2.1.1 EIA Preparation. Review. and
Page 5 and 6:
4.1 Air ...........................
Page 7 and 8:
4.4.2 Land Owners .................
Page 9 and 10:
....................... ....... 5.2
Page 11 and 12:
9.3 Continuous Monitoring of Emissi
Page 13 and 14:
e I. 1 Introduction 1.0 EXECUTIVE S
Page 15 and 16:
operation of the Krasnodar GRES fac
Page 17 and 18:
e plant staffing structure. Departm
Page 19 and 20:
e Plant Sewage Discharge - Potentia
Page 21 and 22:
The off-site air monitoring station
Page 23 and 24:
In addition, the plant electric tra
Page 25 and 26:
@ In addition, several public meeti
Page 27 and 28:
@ Training facilities should be ins
Page 29 and 30:
2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIV
Page 31 and 32:
2.1.1 EIA Preparation, Review, and
Page 33 and 34: e Regulations by the Russian Federa
Page 35 and 36: * and 2.2.3 Occupational Health and
Page 37 and 38: electromagnetic field intensities b
Page 39 and 40: PH Contaminant or Parameter BOD Hea
Page 41 and 42: TABLE 2.6 Electromagnetic Field Int
Page 43 and 44: negligence or non-negligence; degre
Page 45 and 46: e Odessa Declaration on the Black S
Page 47 and 48: Environmental and workplace quality
Page 49 and 50: consists of large gravel mixed with
Page 51 and 52: 3.2.7 Water Source The source of op
Page 53 and 54: standards in addition to any design
Page 55 and 56: 3.3.4 Estimated Plant Emissions Air
Page 57 and 58: Adding a new double-circuit 220 kV
Page 59 and 60: The summer is hot and long (it begi
Page 61 and 62: Notes: 1. Previous meteorological s
Page 63 and 64: 4.1 .I .4 Annual and Seasonal Preci
Page 65 and 66: Months I I I I I I IV V V I VII Vll
Page 67 and 68: During rainfall and fog the western
Page 69 and 70: Years 1979 1979 1980 1980 1980 1980
Page 71 and 72: 4.1.3 Air Quality Impact by Nitroge
Page 73 and 74: Appendices 8 and 9 are indicative o
Page 75 and 76: River Laba Malaya Laba Point Doguzh
Page 77 and 78: a steady low water level which can
Page 79 and 80: i, Section F, ' 1 m BS m m2 1 41 4.
Page 81 and 82: Section 1 2 3 4 Sum i, m BS Q I m3/
Page 83: Table 4.21 Average Annual Water Dis
Page 87 and 88: Dimensionality 8 % mln. m3 8 O h ml
Page 89: Table 4.29 Chemical Composition of
Page 92 and 93: Sampling Date 14.V 15.VI 2.8 20.V 2
Page 94 and 95: Table 4.34 Recorded Disposals into
Page 96 and 97: 4.2.2.2 Thickness and Occurrence of
Page 98 and 99: 4.2.2.4 The Regions of Groundwater
Page 100 and 101: 4.3. I. 1 Stratigraphy In the Cauca
Page 102 and 103: * These An earthquake closest to th
Page 104 and 105: a 4.3.1.4 Relief In a geomorphologi
Page 106 and 107: 4.3.1.5 Mineralogy The deposits of
Page 108 and 109: 4.3.1.8 Frozen-State Regime Climate
Page 110 and 111: Humic-gley soil constitutes 17% and
Page 112 and 113: a reaches In terms of humus horizon
Page 114 and 115: @ In terms of the leaching extent,
Page 116 and 117: Form of Use Arable land Perennial p
Page 118 and 119: @ River Laba Malaya Laba 4.4.1 Land
Page 120 and 121: Name Administration of Mostovskoy 1
Page 122 and 123: N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 124 and 125: a The average annual increase of pl
Page 126 and 127: Data on record keeping of ungulate
Page 128 and 129: divided into separate massifs by th
Page 130 and 131: a 4.5.2.1.3 Animal Kingdom The Cauc
Page 132 and 133: the Southern slope. European minks
Page 134 and 135:
4.6.1.3 Labor and Occupation Market
Page 136 and 137:
Total Disease of circulation organs
Page 138 and 139:
and waste with negative impacts on
Page 140 and 141:
Existing Environment Conditions Lan
Page 142 and 143:
5.1.2.5 River Crossing by Transmiss
Page 144 and 145:
5.2 Operation Stage Figure 5.1 is r
Page 146 and 147:
Maximum concentration of nitrogen o
Page 148 and 149:
Distance From the Power Plant, km 1
Page 150 and 151:
probability is 7.14 m3/sec and this
Page 152 and 153:
Underflooding of the power plant te
Page 154 and 155:
Water pollution at the water intake
Page 156 and 157:
Biological pollution and chemical p
Page 158 and 159:
Noise range in the engine room fall
Page 160 and 161:
Reference points 002 through 004 ar
Page 162 and 163:
use of individual noise reduction m
Page 164 and 165:
' - European feather grass Anapa, L
Page 166 and 167:
Populated Areas Mostovskoy Pereprav
Page 168 and 169:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # Table 5.1 2 Est
Page 170 and 171:
In accordance with the district Adm
Page 172 and 173:
during oil transportation. The othe
Page 174 and 175:
are then directed to an oillwater s
Page 176 and 177:
Biological reclamation - bogging an
Page 178 and 179:
- direct impact on vegetation, fore
Page 180 and 181:
5.2.3.2 Transmission Lines 5.2.3.2.
Page 182 and 183:
5.2.3.2.2 Impacts on Bird Migration
Page 184 and 185:
Positive lmpacts Additional facilit
Page 186 and 187:
6.0 WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY Health
Page 188 and 189:
In the course of practical training
Page 190 and 191:
knowledge of power generator's safe
Page 192 and 193:
@ Urgent instruction is carried out
Page 194 and 195:
- preventive maintenance of the equ
Page 196 and 197:
Governing Standard: "Regulations in
Page 198 and 199:
The Plant Substation; Fenced-off ar
Page 200 and 201:
CONTAMINANT RUSSIA CO NO2 SO2 Parti
Page 202 and 203:
urn agricultural wastes for fuel, t
Page 204 and 205:
production and the large land area
Page 206 and 207:
Interconnection to the existing tra
Page 208 and 209:
7.6 Alternative Water Supplies and
Page 210 and 211:
4. "Report No. 256". Krasnodar Terr
Page 212 and 213:
Target of Impact ENVIRONMENTAL Air
Page 214 and 215:
Impacts Water supply shortages due
Page 216 and 217:
Target of Impact Air Quality Surfac
Page 218 and 219:
Noise levels shall be measured at a
Page 220 and 221:
mobile sources (trucks, loaders, et
Page 222 and 223:
located 0.5 km downstream of the wa
Page 224 and 225:
@ 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND
Page 226 and 227:
@ a facility. Maintenance Training
Page 228:
e conducted. In addition, staff wil
Page 231 and 232:
Primary Planning Responsibility Rev
Page 233 and 234:
11.0 INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AND P
Page 235 and 236:
2. Burns and Roe indicated that Gen
Page 237 and 238:
Discussion: 1. The Regional Environ
Page 239 and 240:
V.V. Fedorovich, Editor and Publish
Page 241 and 242:
* Molokanov: Question: Anikin: Molo
Page 243 and 244:
Molokanov: We have our man in the a
Page 245 and 246:
nuclear power industry to judge it?
Page 247 and 248:
Lazov: There aint' any gas. The nuc
Page 249 and 250:
1 1.2.6 Mostovskoy District Represe
Page 251 and 252:
Having reviewed major project techn
Page 253 and 254:
a 1 1.3.2 Attendees 1. B. G. Teresh
Page 255 and 256:
1 1.3.3 Agenda of Public Hearing Pu
Page 257 and 258:
Answer: Mr 0. Yeschenko. The plant
Page 259 and 260:
@ 11.3.4 Newspaper Coverage of Publ
Page 261 and 262:
Mazut will be used during the start
Page 263 and 264:
June July August Wind rose (summer
Page 265 and 266:
December January February Wind rose
Page 267 and 268:
I Appendix 5 Wind rose at different
Page 269 and 270:
Wind rose in foggy weather and in p
Page 271 and 272:
1 0285004 'Kubansky Gypsum' stock c
Page 273 and 274:
iVlostovsky mill-sorting plant indu
Page 275 and 276:
6 3504831 kIostovskoe PTS 32 Sovets
Page 277 and 278:
agent code 1 untreated 2 including
Page 279 and 280:
a 1555 2704 5 5 acetic acid gasolin
Page 281 and 282:
11 0335493 "Labinsky sugar refinery
Page 283 and 284:
untreated benzol toluene acrolein f
Page 285 and 286:
( agent I code agent description "C
Page 287 and 288:
ethyl alcohol ethyl Cellosoive buty
Page 289 and 290:
chloride 1722 tetramethylt 2.914000
Page 291 and 292:
, 5 16 isoprene (2methylbutadien e-
Page 293 and 294:
a 20 5142419 Labinskaya a/c 1492 18
Page 295 and 296:
agent code agent description "Avtor
Page 297 and 298:
* ' agent code 24 3892633 U B joint
Page 299 and 300:
a - agent. code 26 0001160 Labinska
Page 303 and 304:
APPENDIX 13 CALCULATED GAGES ON THE
Page 305 and 306:
Appendix 15
Page 307 and 308:
The Scheme of the Krasnodar GRES Si
Page 309 and 310:
Mostovsky District Transport Networ
Page 311 and 312:
I KRASNODAR GRES PROJECT IIMPACT OK
Page 315 and 316:
BESTAVAILABLE COPY '"'P'I~~ c)l'[ll
show all

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?