Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment
Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment
a 4.1.1.3 Temperature Range (max., min., etc.) The temperature conditions at the Krasnodar GRES site is closest to that of the location of the Voznesenskaya meteorological station. Thus, to determine average long-term air temperature values at the site, the measurements taken at the Voznesenskaya meteorological station were used as the reference readings. However, the station was closed in 1935, so to adjust observations for the period of 1981 through 1988 to long-term ones and to make calculations that require long-term observations, the Labinsk meteorological station data was used for post-1 935 data. Table 4.2 is representative of the air temperatures accepted for the power plant site. Table 4.3 is representative of the estimated air temperatures for construction design. Table 4.2 Air Temperatures Based on Long-Term Observations (Centigrade) Voznesenskaya Meteorological Station USAIDIKRASEIAIOFFICIALIEIACH4A.DOC 3/26/96 PAGE 4-3
Notes: 1. Previous meteorological studies were conducted in the vicinity of the Krasnodar GRES for a now inactive nuclear plant project. The Perepravnaya met station referenced throughout this section is located approximately 2 km from the Krasnodar GRES site at roughly the same elevation. The Gubskaya met station is located approximately 11 km from the Krasnodar GRES site. 2. Average long-term air temperature for the Perepravnaya site was adjusted by correlating Perepravnaya metlstn data to Labinsk metlstn data (see Attachment 3), and for the Gubskaya site - to Voznesenskaya metlstn data. 3. Average daily At was determined as the difference between average maximum and minimum values. 4. Due to the absence of data for another close meteorological station, the maximum daily At is shown for the Krasnodar meteorological station which is inherent to the region and accepted as equal values for the Krasnodar GRES site. PAGE 4-4
- Page 9 and 10: ....................... ....... 5.2
- Page 11 and 12: 9.3 Continuous Monitoring of Emissi
- Page 13 and 14: e I. 1 Introduction 1.0 EXECUTIVE S
- Page 15 and 16: operation of the Krasnodar GRES fac
- Page 17 and 18: e plant staffing structure. Departm
- Page 19 and 20: e Plant Sewage Discharge - Potentia
- Page 21 and 22: The off-site air monitoring station
- Page 23 and 24: In addition, the plant electric tra
- Page 25 and 26: @ In addition, several public meeti
- Page 27 and 28: @ Training facilities should be ins
- Page 29 and 30: 2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIV
- Page 31 and 32: 2.1.1 EIA Preparation, Review, and
- Page 33 and 34: e Regulations by the Russian Federa
- Page 35 and 36: * and 2.2.3 Occupational Health and
- Page 37 and 38: electromagnetic field intensities b
- Page 39 and 40: PH Contaminant or Parameter BOD Hea
- Page 41 and 42: TABLE 2.6 Electromagnetic Field Int
- Page 43 and 44: negligence or non-negligence; degre
- Page 45 and 46: e Odessa Declaration on the Black S
- Page 47 and 48: Environmental and workplace quality
- Page 49 and 50: consists of large gravel mixed with
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2.7 Water Source The source of op
- Page 53 and 54: standards in addition to any design
- Page 55 and 56: 3.3.4 Estimated Plant Emissions Air
- Page 57 and 58: Adding a new double-circuit 220 kV
- Page 59: The summer is hot and long (it begi
- Page 63 and 64: 4.1 .I .4 Annual and Seasonal Preci
- Page 65 and 66: Months I I I I I I IV V V I VII Vll
- Page 67 and 68: During rainfall and fog the western
- Page 69 and 70: Years 1979 1979 1980 1980 1980 1980
- Page 71 and 72: 4.1.3 Air Quality Impact by Nitroge
- Page 73 and 74: Appendices 8 and 9 are indicative o
- Page 75 and 76: River Laba Malaya Laba Point Doguzh
- Page 77 and 78: a steady low water level which can
- Page 79 and 80: i, Section F, ' 1 m BS m m2 1 41 4.
- Page 81 and 82: Section 1 2 3 4 Sum i, m BS Q I m3/
- Page 83 and 84: Table 4.21 Average Annual Water Dis
- Page 85 and 86: River Site La ba Kaladzhinskaya La
- Page 87 and 88: Dimensionality 8 % mln. m3 8 O h ml
- Page 89: Table 4.29 Chemical Composition of
- Page 92 and 93: Sampling Date 14.V 15.VI 2.8 20.V 2
- Page 94 and 95: Table 4.34 Recorded Disposals into
- Page 96 and 97: 4.2.2.2 Thickness and Occurrence of
- Page 98 and 99: 4.2.2.4 The Regions of Groundwater
- Page 100 and 101: 4.3. I. 1 Stratigraphy In the Cauca
- Page 102 and 103: * These An earthquake closest to th
- Page 104 and 105: a 4.3.1.4 Relief In a geomorphologi
- Page 106 and 107: 4.3.1.5 Mineralogy The deposits of
- Page 108 and 109: 4.3.1.8 Frozen-State Regime Climate
Notes:<br />
1. Previous meteorological studies were conducted in the vicinity of the <strong>Krasnodar</strong><br />
<strong>GRES</strong> for a now inactive nuclear plant project. The Perepravnaya met station<br />
referenced throughout this section is located approximately 2 km from the<br />
<strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong> site at roughly the same elevation. The Gubskaya met station is<br />
located approximately 11 km from the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong> site.<br />
2. Average long-term air temperature for the Perepravnaya site was adjusted by<br />
correlating Perepravnaya metlstn data to Labinsk metlstn data (see Attachment<br />
3), and for the Gubskaya site - to Voznesenskaya metlstn data.<br />
3. Average daily At was determined as the difference between average maximum<br />
and minimum values.<br />
4. Due to the absence of data for another close meteorological station, the<br />
maximum daily At is shown for the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> meteorological station which is<br />
inherent to the region and accepted as equal values for the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong> site.<br />
PAGE 4-4
Change language