14.02.2013 Views

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Monitoring Well Locations<br />

Potable water intake;<br />

Adjacent to the mineralized waste storage tanks;<br />

Outside the fenceline of <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong>.<br />

Exact monitoring well locations will be determined in conjunction with PECC.<br />

Water quality monitoring shall be conducted periodically at intervals established by<br />

the local environmental control bodies of the MEPNR and the sanitary-<br />

epidemiological inspectorate of the Russian Federation.<br />

1.5 Consideration Of Alternatives<br />

Chapter 7 identifies and evaluates reasonable alternatives to the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong><br />

location, design, operation, and other parameters in order to meet the ultimate<br />

objective of providing additional electrical power in the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> Krai and<br />

alleviating the current power deficit. The purpose of the analysis is to determine<br />

any options that may be more sound or beneficial from an environmental,<br />

sociocultural, or economic perspective than the originally conceived, designed,<br />

and proposed power plant, The specific alternatives evaluated for the <strong>Krasnodar</strong><br />

<strong>GRES</strong> and associated conclusions are summarized below:<br />

The No Action Alternative: Due to the current and projected power deficit in<br />

the North Caucasus, the No Action Alternative was not considered to be a<br />

viable option.<br />

Alternative Power Generation Technologies: Alternative technologies<br />

evaluated included hydro power, wind energy, solar thermal, photovoltaics,<br />

and biomass energy. Due to acreage requirements, climactic<br />

considerations, cost and reliability, lead time, and the size of the North<br />

Caucasus power deficit, none of the alternative technologies evaluated is<br />

considered to be a viable alternative to the proposed project.<br />

Alternative Plant, Water Pipeline and Transmission Line Locations: Eighteen<br />

sites were evaluated as possible locations for the proposed power station<br />

by the <strong>Project</strong> Ownership Group. Site criteria evaluated included: land<br />

ownership, availability, and access; topography; existing and potential<br />

environmental impacts; availability of water; equipment transportation;<br />

proximity of gas pipeline; interconnection with regional transmission<br />

systems; and local infrastructure. The Mostovskoy site was determined to<br />

be the most suitable for construction and operation of the <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong>.<br />

PAGE 1-1 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!