14.02.2013 Views

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

production and the large land area required, wind energy is not a viable<br />

alternative.<br />

7.2.3 Solar Thermal<br />

The number of overcast days with 8 to 10 points of total cloudiness in the<br />

Mostovskoy area has been estimated at 114 days per year, based on<br />

meteorological data from the Perepravnaya and Gubskaya sites. In addition, these<br />

same data indicate that the winter season, that period of peak power demand,<br />

has the greatest number of cloudy days, averaging 13 days per month. Thus<br />

solar power, even with appropriate energy storage, will not likely produce or store<br />

sufficient energy to meet the power demands during winter, since approximately<br />

43% of the time essentially no power can be produced. And, on an annualized<br />

basis, power can not be generated approximately 31 % of the time. It has also<br />

been estimated that a solar power and storage facility, capable of producing 900<br />

MW of electricity would require approximately 37,400 hectares of land.") Thus,<br />

given this technology's capability to produce and store sufficient power to meet<br />

demand, and the land required, solar thermal is not a viable alternative.<br />

7.2.4 Photovoltaics<br />

The estimated production cost per kilowatt hour for the proposed <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong><br />

is approximately 160 rubles; the cost of producing power photovoltaicly has been<br />

estimated to be between 1,250 and 1,750 rubles per kilowatt hour in the year<br />

2000. A photovoltaic facility, including battery storage, capable of producing 900<br />

MW would require approximately 19,400 hectares of land.''' Thus, given this<br />

technology's cost and land requirements it is not a viable alternative.<br />

7.2.5 Biomass Energy<br />

There is currently some biomass energy production in the North Caucasus region;<br />

however, since agricultural wastes are used, this power is only available<br />

seasonally. A sustainable more reliable source of biomass energy is trees, and in<br />

order to develop this technology fuelwood plantations would have to be<br />

established in close proximity to the power plant due to transport economics.<br />

Fuelwood plantations generally take upwards of ten years to establish and<br />

develop, prior to the first meaningful harvest. Generally, biomass energy is used<br />

for commercial power production in rural areas with small power demands since a<br />

900 MW biomass energy facility would require approximately 1,440,000 hectares<br />

of arable land for the fuelwood plantation.''' Thus biomass energy is not a viable<br />

alternative.<br />

PAGE 7-4<br />

vkzy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!