Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment
Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment
Krasnodar GRES Project Volume I11 Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
production and the large land area required, wind energy is not a viable<br />
alternative.<br />
7.2.3 Solar Thermal<br />
The number of overcast days with 8 to 10 points of total cloudiness in the<br />
Mostovskoy area has been estimated at 114 days per year, based on<br />
meteorological data from the Perepravnaya and Gubskaya sites. In addition, these<br />
same data indicate that the winter season, that period of peak power demand,<br />
has the greatest number of cloudy days, averaging 13 days per month. Thus<br />
solar power, even with appropriate energy storage, will not likely produce or store<br />
sufficient energy to meet the power demands during winter, since approximately<br />
43% of the time essentially no power can be produced. And, on an annualized<br />
basis, power can not be generated approximately 31 % of the time. It has also<br />
been estimated that a solar power and storage facility, capable of producing 900<br />
MW of electricity would require approximately 37,400 hectares of land.") Thus,<br />
given this technology's capability to produce and store sufficient power to meet<br />
demand, and the land required, solar thermal is not a viable alternative.<br />
7.2.4 Photovoltaics<br />
The estimated production cost per kilowatt hour for the proposed <strong>Krasnodar</strong> <strong>GRES</strong><br />
is approximately 160 rubles; the cost of producing power photovoltaicly has been<br />
estimated to be between 1,250 and 1,750 rubles per kilowatt hour in the year<br />
2000. A photovoltaic facility, including battery storage, capable of producing 900<br />
MW would require approximately 19,400 hectares of land.''' Thus, given this<br />
technology's cost and land requirements it is not a viable alternative.<br />
7.2.5 Biomass Energy<br />
There is currently some biomass energy production in the North Caucasus region;<br />
however, since agricultural wastes are used, this power is only available<br />
seasonally. A sustainable more reliable source of biomass energy is trees, and in<br />
order to develop this technology fuelwood plantations would have to be<br />
established in close proximity to the power plant due to transport economics.<br />
Fuelwood plantations generally take upwards of ten years to establish and<br />
develop, prior to the first meaningful harvest. Generally, biomass energy is used<br />
for commercial power production in rural areas with small power demands since a<br />
900 MW biomass energy facility would require approximately 1,440,000 hectares<br />
of arable land for the fuelwood plantation.''' Thus biomass energy is not a viable<br />
alternative.<br />
PAGE 7-4<br />
vkzy