SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES

More documents

Recommendations

Info

adjustment of our forecast to actual results. Commissioner Ito assumed that we are not required to do it all in one budget year. Mr. Fermin responded that it is over two years. Commissioner Ito assumed that going into 09/10 we have $32.8 million deferred for revenue surplus and that will spread out over two years ... and that’s good news. Mr. Fermin responded that it is good news. Commissioner Ito said that she commented to the Director that the news was not very accurate and, unfortunately, the public was being misinformed with some inaccurate data about what we’re going to decide this morning. That it would result in other increases in cost to our passengers. We need to be clear here this morning that we’re in very good shape and that passengers should not be fearful. Mr. Fermin agreed that we’re in very good financial shape. He ventured to say that with the flight cancellations, we’ll probably see a spike in concession revenues ... food and beverage and retail sales. Item No. 2 was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Guggenhime. The vote to approve was unanimous. 2. Award of Airport Contract 8577R - Terminal 1 Carpet Replacement - Golden State Carpet Service, Inc. - $1,444,789 No. 10-0155 Resolution awarding Contract 8577R, Terminal 1 Carpet Replacement, to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Golden State Carpet Service, Inc., in the amount of $1,444,789. Mr. Jackson Wong, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Deputy Director for Facilities, said that the item before the Commission today is award of Contract No. 8577R, Terminal 1 Carpet Replacement to the lowest, responsive, responsible bidder, Golden State Carpet Service, Inc. in the amount of $1,444,789. The purpose of this project is to replace the existing warn and deteriorated carpet in the public areas of the first and second levels of Terminal1, including Boarding Areas B and C. We received four bids on March 26, 2010, there were no protests on this award. Adryl Construction and Development Corp. was the apparent low bidder, however, Adryl failed to satisfy the experience and qualification requirements. Airport staff subsequently reviewed the bid submitted from Golden State Carpet Service, Inc., the next apparent low bidder, and found it responsive in all ways. Golden State Carpet has satisfied the LBE subcontract participation goal for this contract of 4%. Staff recommends the award of this contract to Golden State Carpet Service, Inc. Item No. 3 was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Mazzola. The vote to approve was unanimous. Minutes, April 20, 2010, Page 6
3. Establish a Shortlist of Prequalified Design-Build Firms for Contract 8974.A, Boarding Area E Refurbishment, and Authorize a Request for Proposals No. 10-0156 Resolution approving Selection Panel’s recommendation establishing a shortlist of prequalified design–build firms for Contract 8974.A - Boarding Area E Refurbishment, and authorizing the Director to issue a Request for Proposals. Mr. Ivar Satero, Deputy Director, Bureau of Design and Construction, said that this item requests Commission approval of a shortlist of prequalified firms and authorize the RFP for the design-build services for the Boarding Area E refurbishment. This project will provide for a significant level of improvement to B/A E after American Airlines is relocated into Terminal 2 after its completion. This gives us the opportunity to prepare the facility and refresh it for the new tenants that will be moved into B/A E. The budget presented to the Commission previously was $15million and since that time we’ve elected to add International Terminal type infrastructure scope to the project to be consistent with the special systems infrastructure going into the Terminal 2 project. We’ve also elected to include the design of the baggage handling system and passenger boarding bridges bid package and assign it to this contractor to ensure successful coordination of all of that work with the base contract. With those adds, we are proposing a revised total estimate for this contract of $22 million. In response to the RFQ, we received 10 statements of qualifications (SOQs) from design built teams. All teams were determined to have met the minimum qualifications to participate. We convened a four member selection panel to review the SOQs. They reviewed and ranked the firms accordingly, in accordance with the criteria stated in the RFQ. As stated in the RFQ, the Airport may recommend up to five firms to participate in the next phase of the procurement which is the RFP phase. Given the quality of the SOQs and the number of firms that submitted SOQs we are recommending that the Commission approve five firms to be shortlisted for the RFP. The five firms that we are recommending are Hensel Phelps Construction with KPA; Turner Construction with PGH Wong; Hunt Construction with Gerson Overstreet; Walsh Construction with Jacobs Consultancy; and Swinerton Builders with Burns and MacDonald. For the RFP phase, all firms will submit proposals consistent with the RFP documents which we will issue shortly. We will again convene our selection panels to review the proposals and conduct interviews with the firms and key personnel. This phase of the evaluation is based on the team providing best value in accordance with the Design Build Ordinance. The cost component will evaluate the general conditions proposed by the general contractor, the fixed design fee and then the markup that will apply to all subcontracted scope. The qualifications component of the evaluation will be based on prior project experience, relevant experience and qualifications and expertise of key personnel and the proposed management approach on the project. Following evaluation and scoring, we will Minutes, April 20, 2010, Page 7
Page 1 and 2: SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MI
Page 3 and 4: G. NEW BUSINESS: Elimination of Tax
Page 5: There were no items initiated by Co
Page 9 and 10: firms to be included in the pool li
Page 11 and 12: G. NEW BUSINESS: Holland & Knight c
Page 13 and 14: Commissioner Mazzola asked Mr. Lawr
Page 15: Commissioner Guggenhime said that n

SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?