14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 The Boundary of a <strong>Convex</strong> Body 71<br />

each complete metric or locally compact space is Baire. The rational numbers with<br />

the usual topology are an example of a space which is not Baire.<br />

Ever since their introduction by Baire [45] <strong>and</strong> Osgood [780], Baire categories<br />

have been applied successfully in real analysis. See, e.g. Oxtoby [782] <strong>and</strong> Holmes<br />

[520]. In recent years they found numerous applications in convex geometry, compare<br />

the surveys of Zamfirescu [1041] <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gruber</strong> [431], <strong>and</strong> Sect. 13.1.<br />

Given a proper convex body, its boundary is compact <strong>and</strong> thus Baire by the category<br />

theorem. The finite-dimensional case of the density theorem of Mazur [701] is<br />

as follows.<br />

Theorem 5.2. Let C ∈ Cp. Then the set of singular points of bd C is meagre in bd C.<br />

Proof. For n = 1, 2,...,let<br />

Sn = � x ∈ bd C : there are support hyperplanes at x with angle at least 1 �<br />

.<br />

n<br />

A simple compactness argument shows that Sn is closed in bd C. In order to show<br />

that<br />

(5) Sn is nowhere dense in bd C,<br />

assume the contrary. Being closed, Sn then contains a relatively open subset G of<br />

bd C.IfB is a solid Euclidean ball of sufficiently small radius, there is a translate of<br />

B contained in C which touches bd C at a point x ∈ G. Then, clearly, C has a unique<br />

support hyperplane at x. Since this is in contradiction to x ∈ G ⊆ Sn, the proof of<br />

(5) is complete. Clearly,<br />

∞�<br />

(6) Sn = � x ∈ bd C : x singular � .<br />

n=1<br />

The theorem now follows from (5) <strong>and</strong> (6). ⊓⊔<br />

Differentiability<br />

A (d − 1)-dimensional manifold in E d may be represented explicitly, implicitly or<br />

by means of parameters. The problem arises to move differentiability properties or<br />

results, from one representation to the others. In differential geometry this is done by<br />

means of refined versions of the theorems on implicit <strong>and</strong> inverse functions, using<br />

differentiability assumptions. Unfortunately, in general, such possibilities are not<br />

available in convex geometry. Thus one has to argue more carefully, even in simple<br />

cases. In the following we consider the problem of transferring first <strong>and</strong> secondorder<br />

differentiability at given points from convex functions to convex bodies <strong>and</strong><br />

vice versa.<br />

First-Order Differentiability<br />

Let D be an open convex set in E d <strong>and</strong> f : D → R a convex function. Clearly,<br />

notions such as support hyperplanes <strong>and</strong> regular <strong>and</strong> singular boundary points <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!