14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

33.1 Fejes Tóth’s Inequality for Sums of Moments<br />

33 Optimum Quantization 481<br />

The 2-dimensional case of the problem has attracted the interest of the Hungarian<br />

school of discrete geometry, ever since Fejes Tóth published his inequality on sums<br />

of moments. By now, there are more than a dozen proofs of it known. The inequality<br />

has applications to packing <strong>and</strong> covering problems for circular discs, to volume<br />

approximation of convex bodies in E 3 by circumscribed convex polytopes <strong>and</strong> to<br />

problems in areas outside of mathematics such as economics <strong>and</strong> geography. For a<br />

planar generalization of it, to which Fejes Tóth, Fejes Tóth, Imre <strong>and</strong> Florian contributed,<br />

see the report of Florian [337]. The inequality on sums of moments indicates<br />

that, for certain geometric <strong>and</strong> analytic problems, regular hexagonal configurations<br />

are close to optimal, <strong>and</strong> are possibly optimal.<br />

In this section the sum theorem of Fejes Tóth will be presented.<br />

For more information, see the book of Fejes Tóth [329] <strong>and</strong> the surveys of Florian<br />

[337] <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gruber</strong> [438, 442].<br />

Sums of Moments<br />

Let f :[0, +∞) →[0, +∞) be non-decreasing, where f (0) = 0, <strong>and</strong> let H be a<br />

convex 3, 4, 5, or 6-gon in E2 . Then, given a dissection C1,...,Cn of H <strong>and</strong> a set<br />

S ={s1,...,sn} of n points in H or in Ed ,thesum<br />

�<br />

�<br />

f (�x − si�)dx<br />

i<br />

Ci<br />

is called a sum of moments. If f (t) = t 2 , this is a sum of moments of inertia. If for<br />

the sets Ci we take the Dirichlet–Voronoĭ cells<br />

Di = � x ∈ H :�x − si� ≤�x − s j� for j = 1,...,n � , i = 1,...,n,<br />

in H corresponding to S, then the sum of moments decreases <strong>and</strong>, in addition,<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

f (�x − si�)dx = min{<br />

f (�x − s�)}dx.<br />

s∈S<br />

i<br />

Di<br />

Fejes Tóth’s Inequality for Sums of Moments<br />

Our aim is to prove the following result of Fejes Tóth [329].<br />

Theorem 33.1. Let f :[0, +∞) →[0, +∞) be non-decreasing where f (0) = 0<br />

<strong>and</strong> let H ⊆ E2 be a convex 3, 4, 5, or6-gon. Then,<br />

(1) I (H, f, n) = inf<br />

S⊆E2 �<br />

�<br />

#S=n<br />

min{<br />

f (�x − s�)}dx ≥ n<br />

s∈S<br />

f (�x�)dx,<br />

H<br />

H<br />

Hn

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!