14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

462 <strong>Geometry</strong> of Numbers<br />

Then<br />

(1 + t) d<br />

�<br />

m<br />

≤ e dt<br />

1<br />

+<br />

sd td �<br />

d log 1<br />

t<br />

�<br />

1 − 1<br />

sd �m� 1 m<br />

+ e− s<br />

td d<br />

�<br />

≤ e 1 �<br />

log d d log(d log d) + 1<br />

t d e−d log 1 t<br />

�<br />

≤ 1 + 2<br />

�<br />

(d log d + d log log d + 1)<br />

log d<br />

≤ d log d + d log log d + 5d = d log d � 1 + o(1) � . ⊓⊔<br />

Remark. The following lower estimate of Coxeter, Few <strong>and</strong> Rogers [233] shows<br />

that Theorem 31.4 cannot be improved much, if at all:<br />

Rogers’s Upper Bound for ϑL(C)<br />

ϑT (B d ) > ∼ d<br />

e √ e<br />

�<br />

as d →∞.<br />

A more refined proof led Rogers [850] to a corresponding result for lattice coverings<br />

which is stated without proof:<br />

Theorem 31.5. Let C be a proper convex body in E d , where d ≥ 3. Then<br />

ϑL(C) ≤ d log2d (1+o(1)) as d →∞.<br />

31.4 Lattice Covering Versus Covering with Translates<br />

In Sect. 30.4 we encountered the phenomenon that certain general extremal configurations<br />

are not better than corresponding extremal lattice configurations. In addition,<br />

general extremal configurations may have lattice characteristics. A planar example<br />

of this, dealing with packing of convex discs was presented <strong>and</strong> a case where general<br />

extremal configurations exhibit regular hexagonality mentioned.<br />

Thinnest lattice coverings in E 2 with o-symmetric convex discs have minimum<br />

density among all coverings by translates as shown by Kershner. A stability result<br />

of <strong>Gruber</strong> [436] says that thinnest coverings of E 2 by circular discs are arranged<br />

asymptotically in the form of a regular hexagonal pattern. For more information<br />

compare the survey [438].<br />

A Result of Fejes Tóth <strong>and</strong> Bambah <strong>and</strong> Rogers<br />

Without proof, we state the following result of Fejes Tóth [328] <strong>and</strong> Bambah <strong>and</strong><br />

Rogers [59]. The special case for circular discs is due to Kershner [578]. For an<br />

alternative proof of Kershner’s result, see Sect. 33.4. It is an open problem, whether<br />

the symmetry assumption can be omitted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!