14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

438 <strong>Geometry</strong> of Numbers<br />

Let q(x) = � aik xi xk be a positive definite quadratic form q on E d , with arithmetric<br />

minimum m <strong>and</strong> discriminant δ = det(aik). q is eutactic if the following<br />

statement holds: let (bik) = (aik) −1 . Then<br />

(b11, 2b12,...,2b1d, b22, 2b23,...,bdd),<br />

the normal vector of the discriminant surface D(δ) at its point q, is a linear combination<br />

with positive coefficients of the vectors<br />

(u 2 1 , 2u1u2,...,2u1ud, u 2 2 , 2u2u3,...,u 2 d )<br />

where ±(u1,...,ud) ∈ Zd ranges over the minimum vectors of q. These vectors<br />

are the normal vectors of the facets of the Ryshkov polyhedron R(m) which contain<br />

the boundary point q of R(m) <strong>and</strong> thus generate the normal cone of R(m) at q. This<br />

seemingly strange definition is, in fact, perfectly natural, as will be clear from the<br />

following basic theorem of Voronoĭ [1012] <strong>and</strong> its proof.<br />

It seems that Coxeter [229] was the first to use the word eutactic in the present<br />

context. Presumably, he wanted to express the fact that (bik) is well (=eu in Greek)determined<br />

(=tactic) by the vectors (u2 1 ,...,2u1ud,...,u2 d ). See also Martinet [690].<br />

Theorem 29.9. A positive definite quadratic form on E d is extreme if <strong>and</strong> only if it is<br />

perfect <strong>and</strong> eutactic.<br />

Proof (by means of the Ryshkov polyhedron). Let q be a positive definite quadratic<br />

form on E d with coefficients aik, arithmetic minimum m <strong>and</strong> discriminant δ. For<br />

the proof of the theorem, it is sufficient to show that the following statements are<br />

equivalent:<br />

(i) q is extreme.<br />

(ii) A suitable neighbourhood of (a11, a12,...,add) in the polyhedron R(m)<br />

is contained in the unbounded convex body determined by the smooth<br />

<strong>and</strong> strictly convex surface D(δ) through (a11, a12,...,add).<br />

(iii) (a11, a12,...,add) is the only point of R(m) in the tangent hyperplane<br />

of D(δ) at (a11, a12,...,add), that is the hyperplane<br />

�<br />

v = (v11,...,vdd) ∈ E 1 2 d(d+1) : �<br />

�<br />

bik vik = d, vik = vki ,<br />

where (aik) −1 = (bik).<br />

(iv) q is perfect <strong>and</strong> eutactic.<br />

Only (iii)⇔(iv) needs justification: Consider a point of a convex polyhedron <strong>and</strong> a<br />

hyperplane through it. Then the following are equivalent (a) the hyperplane meets the<br />

polyhedron only at this point <strong>and</strong> (b) this point is a vertex of the polyhedron <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

the unique point contained in all facets through it, <strong>and</strong> the exterior normal vector<br />

of the hyperplane is a linear combination with positive coefficients of the exterior<br />

normal vectors of these facets, see Proposition 14.1. ⊓⊔<br />

i,k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!