14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

29 Packing of Balls <strong>and</strong> Positive Quadratic Forms 423<br />

each layer, neighbouring strings touch. Given a layer, the balls in each neighbouring<br />

layer must rest in the pockets formed by three balls in our layer <strong>and</strong> touch all three<br />

balls; otherwise we can form a lattice packing of higher density, which is impossible.<br />

(Of these three balls two are in one string <strong>and</strong> the third one in a neighbouring string.)<br />

We thus have obtained three balls, touching pairwise. (Of these three balls two are<br />

neighbours in a string in our layer <strong>and</strong> one is from a parallel neighbouring layer.) We<br />

now change our point of view. By periodicity we may suppose that these three balls<br />

have centres at o, a, b ∈ L, where o, a, b form an equilateral triangle. The balls with<br />

centres in the 2-dimensional sub-lattice of L generated by a, b form a layer in which<br />

the balls are arranged hexagonally. The balls in the parallel neighbouring layers must<br />

rest in the pockets formed by three pairwise touching balls in our layer <strong>and</strong> touch all<br />

three balls; otherwise we can obtain a lattice packing of higher density. This shows<br />

that L is generated by points a, b, c, such that o, a, b, c form the vertices of a regular<br />

tetrahedron. That is, L is a face-centred cubic lattice <strong>and</strong> an elementary calculation<br />

shows that the density is as required. ⊓⊔<br />

Densest Packing of Translates in Dimension 2 <strong>and</strong> 3<br />

For d = 2 Thue [996, 997] showed that<br />

δT (B 2 ) = δL(B 2 ).<br />

A gap in Thue’s proof was filled by Fejes Tóth [327]. For a proof of a more general<br />

result due to Fejes Tóth <strong>and</strong> Rogers, see Sect. 30.4. For a proof of Thue’s theorem,<br />

based on Fejes Tóth’s moment theorem 33.1, compare Sect. 33.4.<br />

In a recent breakthrough Hales has proved the so-called Kepler conjecture, which<br />

says that<br />

δL(B 3 ) = δT (B 3 ).<br />

See Hales [472–474]. Hales’ proof is long <strong>and</strong> computationally involved. In [474]<br />

an outline if given. Many mathematicians had previously worked on this problem,<br />

including Fejes Tóth, Zassenhaus <strong>and</strong> Hsiang. Fejes Tóth, in particular, described in<br />

his book [329] a plan of a proof in which the problem is reduced to an optimization<br />

problem in finitely many variables over a compact set which, possibly, can be solved<br />

in the future on a computer. This would yield a proof with a transparent mathematical<br />

part.<br />

Heuristic Observation<br />

Consider densest lattice packings of the unit ball in E d for d = 2, 3,.... The space<br />

between the balls of the packings seems to become bigger <strong>and</strong> bigger as the dimension<br />

increases. Thus, for sufficiently large d, a suitable translate of B d should fit<br />

between the balls of a densest lattice packing. Then, by periodicity, a suitable translate<br />

of the whole lattice packing also fits into the space left uncovered by the original

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!