14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 Theorems of Alex<strong>and</strong>rov, Minkowski <strong>and</strong> Lindelöf 303<br />

Next, define a graph G on bd R as follows: in each facet of R choose a relative<br />

interior point, a knot. Two knots are connected by an edge, that is a Jordan curve<br />

in bd R if the facets containing the knots have a common (ordinary) edge (of R).<br />

Clearly, the edges of G may be chosen such that they meet only at their endpoints, if<br />

at all. Mark an edge of G by +, −, or leave it unmarked, if the corresponding edge<br />

of R is so marked. Proposition (2) now reads as follows.<br />

If a knot of G is the endpoint of a marked edge of G, then, on a circuit of the<br />

knot, there are at least four changes of sign of the edges of G, omitting the<br />

unmarked edges.<br />

Cauchy’s combinatorial lemma 17.2 then shows that there is no marked edge of G.<br />

This, in turn, implies that none of the edges of R is marked. Hence (2) implies the<br />

following.<br />

For each facet H = F +G of R the faces F <strong>and</strong> G of P <strong>and</strong> Q, respectively,<br />

are both facets <strong>and</strong> they coincide up to translation.<br />

Since this exhausts all facets of P <strong>and</strong> Q, we see that<br />

The facets of P <strong>and</strong> Q appear in parallel pairs <strong>and</strong> the facets of any such<br />

pair coincide up to translation.<br />

Finally, building up bd P <strong>and</strong> bd Q starting with a pair of parallel facets <strong>and</strong> adding<br />

the adjacent facets, etc., we see that bd P <strong>and</strong> bd Q <strong>and</strong> thus P <strong>and</strong> Q coincide up to<br />

translation.<br />

(ii)⇒(i) Trivial. ⊓⊔<br />

Remark. This result does not extend to E d , d ≥ 4 in a straightforward way. To see<br />

this, consider a box in E d with edge-lengths 1, 1, 3,...,3 <strong>and</strong> a cube of edge-length<br />

2 with edges parallel to those of the box.<br />

Problem 18.1. Find a version of Alex<strong>and</strong>rov’s theorem which holds in every<br />

dimension.<br />

18.2 Minkowski’s Existence Theorem <strong>and</strong> Symmetry Condition<br />

It is a natural question to ask whether a convex polytope is determined by the areas of<br />

its facets or the curvatures at its vertices. The first pertinent result of this type seems<br />

to be Minkowski’s [739] existence <strong>and</strong> uniqueness theorem for convex polytopes<br />

with given exterior normal vectors <strong>and</strong> areas of the facets. This result is the first<br />

step in the proof of the existence of a convex body with given surface area measure,<br />

see Sect. 10.1. A different result is Alex<strong>and</strong>rov’s theorem [16] on the existence <strong>and</strong><br />

uniqueness of convex polytopes with vertices on fixed rays <strong>and</strong> given corresponding<br />

curvatures.<br />

Here, we present Minkowski’s existence <strong>and</strong> uniqueness theorem for convex<br />

polytopes. As an application, we show Minkowski’s condition for the central symmetry<br />

of a convex polytope which will be used in the proof of the Venkov–McMullen<br />

theorem on tilings in Sect. 32.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!