14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 Combinatorial Theory of <strong>Convex</strong> Polytopes 279<br />

where N ∈ N <strong>and</strong> the pi <strong>and</strong> the q j are real polynomials on E N with integer coefficients.<br />

For example, {0, 1} <strong>and</strong> ]0, 1[ are primary semi-algebraic sets, but (0, 1] <strong>and</strong><br />

[0, 1] are not.<br />

On the family of all primary semi-algebraic sets, there is an equivalence relation,<br />

called stable equivalence, which preserves certain geometric properties, for example<br />

the homotopy type, see [834].<br />

What do Realization Spaces Look Like?<br />

It is easy to show that the realization space of a convex polytope P is a primary<br />

semi-algebraic set. (The polynomials pi <strong>and</strong> q j are formed with determinants of<br />

d × d minors of the d × n matrices x = (x1,...,xn) ∈ E N .)<br />

The following result, for d = 3, follows from a close inspection of a proof of the<br />

Steinitz representation theorem, see Richter-Gebert [833].<br />

Theorem 15.10. The realization space of a proper convex polytope P in E 3 is a<br />

smooth open ball in E f1−6 , where f1 is the number of edges of P.<br />

For d > 3 the situation is much more involved. Improving upon a deep theorem<br />

of Mnëv [746], Richter-Gebert [833] proved the following universality theorem.<br />

Theorem 15.11. For every primary semi-algebraic set A, there is a (not necessarily<br />

proper) convex polytope P in E 4 , such that A is stably equivalent to R(P).<br />

Tools for the proof are so-called Lawrence extensions <strong>and</strong> connected sums. These<br />

are elementary geometric operations on polytopes.<br />

Remark. The universality theorem shows that the realization spaces of convex polytopes<br />

may be arbitrarily complicated. This has been interpreted to indicate that there<br />

might not exist a reasonable extension of the representation theorem of Steinitz to<br />

higher dimensions. The universality theorem has a series of consequences, for example<br />

the following: There is a convex polytope in E 4 which admits no realization with<br />

rational vertices, compare the discussion in Sect. 15.3.<br />

How Many Combinatorial Types are There?<br />

For d = 3 results of Bender <strong>and</strong> Wormald [94] <strong>and</strong> Bender <strong>and</strong> Richmond [93] yield<br />

asymptotic formulae for the number of combinatorial types of convex polytopes with<br />

n vertices, edges, or faces, as n →∞. For a survey, see Bender [92].<br />

For d > 3 results of Shemer [930], Goodman <strong>and</strong> Pollack [385] <strong>and</strong> Alon [25]<br />

together yield the following estimates.<br />

Theorem 15.12. Let cs(d, n) <strong>and</strong> c(d, n) be the numbers of combinatorial types of<br />

proper simplicial <strong>and</strong> general convex polytopes in E d with n vertices. Then<br />

�<br />

n − d<br />

� nd<br />

4<br />

≤ cs(d, n) ≤ c(d, n) ≤<br />

d<br />

�<br />

n<br />

�d2n(1+o(1)) as n →∞.<br />

d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!