14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Preliminaries <strong>and</strong> the Face Lattice 253<br />

intersects F along G.Ifδ>0 is sufficiently small, then all vertices of P not in G are<br />

in int H − G . Hence HG is a support hyperplane of P with G = HG ∩ P. This shows<br />

that G is a face of P.<br />

(ii) If G =∅, F, we are done. If not, choose support hyperplanes HF, HG of P<br />

such that F = HF ∩ P, G = HG ∩ P. This, together with G�F, implies that HF �=<br />

HG <strong>and</strong> HF ∩ HG is a hyperplane in HF. Since HG supports P <strong>and</strong> F ⊆ P, HF<br />

<strong>and</strong> F �⊆ HG, the hyperplane HF ∩ HG in HF supports F. Since G = HG ∩ P,<br />

G ⊆ F ⊆ P, <strong>and</strong> F ⊆ HF, wehaveG = HG ∩ P = HG ∩ F = HG ∩ HF ∩ F.<br />

Hence G is a face of F. ⊓⊔<br />

The next result shows that F(P) is a lattice.<br />

Theorem 14.6. Let P ∈ P <strong>and</strong> define binary operations ∧ (intersection) <strong>and</strong> ∨<br />

(join) on F(P) as follows:<br />

(1) F ∧ G = F ∩ G,<br />

F ∨ G = � � H ∈ F(P) : F, G ⊆ H � for F, G ∈ F(P).<br />

Then � F(P), ∧, ∨ � is a lattice with zero ∅ <strong>and</strong> unit element P, the face lattice of P.<br />

Proof. A finite family of sets, which is closed with respect to intersection <strong>and</strong> contains<br />

the empty set ∅ <strong>and</strong> the union of all sets, is a lattice with respect to the operations<br />

∧, ∨ as defined in (1). The zero element of this lattice is ∅ <strong>and</strong> the unit element is<br />

the union of all sets. For the proof of the theorem it is thus sufficient to show the<br />

following.<br />

(2) Let F, G ∈ F(P). Then F ∩ G ∈ F(P).<br />

If F ∩ G =∅or F = G or F = P or G = P, we are done. Otherwise we may<br />

assume that o ∈ F ∩ G. Choose support hyperplanes<br />

of P, such that<br />

HF ={x : u · x = 0}, HG ={x : v · x = 0}<br />

F = HF ∩ P, G = HG ∩ P.<br />

Since F �= G, wehaveHF �= HG. Thus HF ∩ HG is a support plane (of dimension<br />

d − 2) of P with<br />

F ∩ G = (HF ∩ HG) ∩ P.<br />

The hyperplane<br />

is a support hyperplane <strong>and</strong><br />

H ={x : (u + v) · x = 0}<br />

H ∩ P = (HF ∩ HG) ∩ P = F ∩ G,<br />

concluding the proof of (2) <strong>and</strong> thus of the theorem. ⊓⊔

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!