14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

204 <strong>Convex</strong> Bodies<br />

For more information on John’s theorem <strong>and</strong> its aftermath, see the article of<br />

Ball [53] <strong>and</strong> the surveys of Johnson <strong>and</strong> Lindenstrauss [552], Ball [54], <strong>and</strong><br />

Giannopoulos <strong>and</strong> Milman [374] in the H<strong>and</strong>book of the <strong>Geometry</strong> of Banach<br />

Spaces. For information on other John type <strong>and</strong> so-called minimum position results<br />

see <strong>Gruber</strong> [445].<br />

Uniqueness <strong>and</strong> John’s Characterization of Inscribed Ellipsoids of Maximum<br />

Volume<br />

Our aim here is to show the results of Löwner, Behrend [90], Danzer, Laugwitz <strong>and</strong><br />

Lenz [242], <strong>and</strong> of John [549], Pełczyński [788], <strong>and</strong> Ball [51], respectively, for<br />

o-symmetric convex bodies.<br />

Given d ×d matrices A = (aij), B = (bij), define their inner product by A· B =<br />

� aijbij, where summation on i <strong>and</strong> j is from 1 to d. The dot · denotes also the<br />

ordinary inner product in E d .Foru,v ∈ E d ,letu ⊗ v be the d ×d matrix u v T . Then<br />

(u ⊗ v)x = (v · x) u for u,v,x ∈ E d . I is the d × d unit matrix.<br />

Theorem 11.1. Let C ∈ Cp be symmetric in o. Then there is a unique ellipsoid of<br />

maximum volume (necessarily symmetric in o) amongst all ellipsoids contained in C.<br />

Theorem 11.2. Let C ∈ Cp be symmetric in o <strong>and</strong> B d ⊆ C. Then the following<br />

statements are equivalent:<br />

(i) Bd is the unique ellipsoid of maximum volume amongst all ellipsoids in C.<br />

(ii) There are ui ∈ Bd ∩ bd C <strong>and</strong> λi > 0, i = 1,...,m, where d ≤ m ≤ 1 2d(d + 1)<br />

such that<br />

I = �<br />

λi ui ⊗ ui, �<br />

λk = d.<br />

i<br />

Here, <strong>and</strong> in the following, summation on i <strong>and</strong> k is from 1 to m. It is not difficult to<br />

extend both theorems to convex bodies C which are not necessarily symmetric in o.<br />

Without loss of generality, we assume, in the following, that all ellipsoids are<br />

symmetric in o. Before beginning the proof, we state two tools:<br />

(1) Each non-singular d ×d matrix M can be represented in the form M = AR,<br />

where A is a symmetric, positive definite <strong>and</strong> R an orthogonal d ×d matrix.<br />

(Take A = (MM T ) 1 2 <strong>and</strong> R = A −1 M, see [367], p.112.) Identify a symmetric d × d<br />

matrix A = (aij) with the point (a11,...,a1d, a22,...,a2d,...,add) ∈ E 1 2 d(d+1) .<br />

Then, the set of all symmetric positive definite d × d matrices is (represented by) an<br />

open convex cone P in E 1 2 d(d+1) with apex at the origin. The set<br />

(2) D ={A ∈ P : det A ≥ 1} is a closed, smooth <strong>and</strong> strictly convex set in P<br />

with non-empty interior.<br />

This follows from the implicit function theorem <strong>and</strong> Minkowski’s determinant<br />

inequality,<br />

k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!