14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Reverse Normal Image<br />

10 Problems of Minkowski <strong>and</strong> Weyl <strong>and</strong> Some Dynamics 189<br />

Let C ∈ Cp be given. Given a Borel set B ⊆ Sd−1 ,thereverse normal or reverse<br />

(B) of B in bd C is defined by<br />

spherical image n −1<br />

C<br />

n −1<br />

C (B) = � x ∈ bd C : there is an exterior normal<br />

unit vector of bd C at x contained in B � .<br />

Let µd−1 be the (d − 1)-dimensional Hausdorff measure in E d . A subset of bd C is<br />

measurable if it is measurable with respect to µd−1| bd C.<br />

Proposition 10.1. The reverse normal image of a Borel set in S d−1 is measurable in<br />

bd C.<br />

Proof. Let M be the family of all sets B in Sd−1 for which n −1<br />

C (B) is measurable.<br />

We have to show that M contains all Borel sets in Sd−1 . This will be done in three<br />

steps.<br />

First, the following will be shown:<br />

(1) Let B ⊆ Sd−1 be compact. Then n −1<br />

C (B) is compact in bd C <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

B ∈ M.<br />

To see this, let x1, x2, ··· ∈ n −1<br />

C (B) such that x1, x2, ··· → x ∈ bd C, say.We<br />

have to show that x ∈ n −1<br />

C (B). Choose u1, u2, ··· ∈ B ⊆ S d−1 for which xn ∈<br />

n −1<br />

C (un) for n = 1, 2,... By considering a suitable subsequence <strong>and</strong> renumbering,<br />

if necessary, we may suppose that u1, u2, ···→u ∈ S d−1 , say. Since B is compact,<br />

u ∈ B. The body C is contained in each of the support halfspaces {z : un · z ≤<br />

un · xn}. Since un → u, xn → x, it follows that C is contained in the halfspace<br />

{z : u · z ≤ u · x} <strong>and</strong> x is a common boundary point of this halfspace <strong>and</strong> of C.<br />

Hence this halfspace supports C <strong>and</strong> thus x ∈ n −1<br />

C (u) ⊆ n−1<br />

C (B), concluding the<br />

proof of (1).<br />

Second, we claim the following:<br />

(2) Let B ∈ M. Then B c = S d−1 \B ∈ M.<br />

At each point of n −1<br />

C<br />

(B) ∩ n−1<br />

C (Bc ) there are two different exterior unit normal vec-<br />

(B) ∩ n−1<br />

C (Bc )<br />

� −1<br />

is singular. The theorem of Anderson <strong>and</strong> Klee 5.1 then shows that µd−1 nC (B) ∩<br />

n −1<br />

C (Bc ) � = 0. The set n −1<br />

C (Bc ) thus differs from the set Sd−1 \n −1<br />

C (B) which is<br />

measurable by the assumption in (2), by a set of measure 0 <strong>and</strong> therefore is measurable<br />

itself. The proof of (2) is complete.<br />

Third, the following statement holds:<br />

tors of bd C, one in B, the other one in B c . Hence each point of n −1<br />

C<br />

(3) Let B1, B2, ···∈M. Then B = B1 ∪ B2 ∪···∈M.<br />

This follows from the identity n −1<br />

C (B) = n−1<br />

C (B1) ∪ n −1<br />

C (B2) ∪···<br />

Having proved (1) – (3), it follows that M is a σ -algebra of subsets of Sd−1 containing all compact sets in Sd−1 . It thus contains the smallest such σ -algebra,<br />

that is the family of all Borel sets in Sd−1 . ⊓⊔

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!