14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 The Brunn–Minkowski Inequality 149<br />

inequality were given by Edler [285] (d = 2) <strong>and</strong> Schwarz [922] (d = 3). The latter<br />

based his proof on the calculus of variations <strong>and</strong> used ideas of Weierstrass. For the<br />

history of the classical isoperimetric problem, see Gericke [370] <strong>and</strong> Danilova [236].<br />

As will be seen below, Minkowski surface area <strong>and</strong> the Brunn–Minkowski theorem<br />

are ideal tools for an easy proof of the isoperimetric inequality for convex<br />

bodies. The same proof holds also for much more general sets, but the isoperimetric<br />

inequality thus obtained is not really of interest: Since the Minkowski surface area of<br />

complicated sets in general is rather large, such sets readily satisfy the isoperimetric<br />

inequality. For example, the Minkowski surface area of the set of rational points in<br />

the unit cube is infinite, whereas for any reasonable notion of surface area, a countable<br />

set should have area 0.<br />

A good deal of the modern theory of geometric isoperimetric problems took place<br />

outside convexity in areas where other notions of area measures were available, for<br />

example, integral geometric concepts of area <strong>and</strong> the notions of perimeter <strong>and</strong> currents.<br />

Instead of E d or S d−1 Riemannian <strong>and</strong> more general manifolds have been<br />

considered.<br />

Other developments related to the geometric isoperimetric inequality deal with<br />

the so-called concentration of measure phenomenon in the context of the local theory<br />

of normed spaces.<br />

The following word of Poincaré applies well to the geometric isoperimetric<br />

problem:<br />

There are no solved problems, there are only more-or-less solved problems.<br />

Below we reproduce Hurwitz’s [532] proof for d = 2 for Jordan domains,<br />

by means of Fourier series <strong>and</strong> Minkowski’s [738] proof for general d for convex<br />

bodies. Ingredients of Minkowski’s proof include Steiner’s formula for parallel bodies,<br />

the Brunn–Minkowski inequality <strong>and</strong> Minkowski’s notion of surface area. For<br />

Blaschke’s proof involving Steiner symmetrization, see Sect. 9.2.<br />

Hurwitz’s Proof for Planar Jordan Curves by Means of Fourier Series<br />

Hurwitz [532] derived the following version of the isoperimetric inequality. To simplify<br />

the argument a little bit our assumptions are stronger than actually needed.<br />

For more information on applications of Fourier series in convex geometry, see the<br />

monographs of Groemer [405] <strong>and</strong> Koldobsky [606] <strong>and</strong> the proceedings on Fourier<br />

analysis <strong>and</strong> convexity [343].<br />

Theorem 8.6. Let K be a closed Jordan curve in E 2 of class C 2 with length L <strong>and</strong><br />

let A denote the area of the Jordan domain bounded by K . Then<br />

L 2 ≥ 4π A,<br />

where equality holds if <strong>and</strong> only if K is a circle.<br />

Proof. We may assume that K is positively oriented, has length 2π, with parametrization<br />

(x, y) :[0, 2π] →E 2 , where the parameter is the arc-length s. Since the<br />

arc-length s is the parameter,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!