14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 <strong>Convex</strong> Bodies<br />

8.1 The Classical Brunn–Minkowski Inequality<br />

The Brunn–Minkowski inequality was first proved by Brunn [173,174] with a clever<br />

but rather vague proof. The equality case, in particular, was not settled satisfactorily,<br />

as was pointed out by Minkowski. Then, both Brunn [175] <strong>and</strong> Minkowski [735]<br />

provided correct proofs. At present several essentially different proofs are known, as<br />

well as a series of far-reaching extensions <strong>and</strong> applications.<br />

Dinghas [270] commented on Brunn’s proof as follows:<br />

The ingenious idea of Brunn to relate two convex sets by equal volume ratios ... saw<br />

substantial progress in the last twenty years. It did not yield only refinements of old,<br />

but produced also new results.<br />

The proof that will be given below is a variant of the proof of Brunn [173, 174],<br />

respectively of its precise version due to Kneser <strong>and</strong> Süss [600]. It is by induction<br />

<strong>and</strong> makes use of the idea of Brunn which relates the d-dimensional case to<br />

the (d − 1)-dimensional case by equal volume ratios: let u ∈ Sd−1 <strong>and</strong> H(t) =<br />

{x : u · x = t}. For0≤s ≤ 1lettC(s) <strong>and</strong> tD(s) be such that the hyperplanes<br />

H(tC(s)) <strong>and</strong> H(tD(s)) divide the volume of C, respectively, D, in the ratio s : 1−s.<br />

Clearly,<br />

C + D ⊇ � � �<br />

C ∩ H tC(s) � + D ∩ H � tD(s) �� .<br />

0≤s≤1<br />

Now apply induction to C ∩ H � tC(s) � + D ∩ H � tD(s) � <strong>and</strong> use Fubini’s theorem.<br />

A different proof is due to Blaschke [124]. It makes use of a property of Steiner<br />

symmetrization, namely that<br />

st(C + D) ⊇ st C + st D.<br />

This makes it possible to reduce the proof to the trivial case where C <strong>and</strong> D are balls.<br />

For Blaschke’s proof, see Sect. 9.2.<br />

The Classical Inequality<br />

Our aim is to prove the Brunn–Minkowski inequality:<br />

Theorem 8.1. Let C, D ∈ C. Then:<br />

(1) V (C + D) 1 d ≥ V (C) 1 d + V (D) 1 d ,<br />

where equality holds if <strong>and</strong> only if one of C, D is a point, or C <strong>and</strong> D are improper<br />

<strong>and</strong> lie in parallel hyperplanes, or C <strong>and</strong> D are proper <strong>and</strong> positive homothetic.<br />

Proof. The following inequality will be used below:<br />

(2) � v 1<br />

d−1 + w 1 � �<br />

d−1 V W<br />

�<br />

d−1 + ≥ (V<br />

v w<br />

1 d + W 1 d ) d for v,w,V, W > 0,<br />

where equality holds if <strong>and</strong> only if<br />

v<br />

V d−1<br />

d<br />

= w<br />

W d−1 .<br />

d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!