14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 <strong>Convex</strong> Bodies<br />

7.5 Hadwiger’s Containment Problem<br />

Consider the following<br />

Problem 7.5. Specify (simple necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient) conditions such that two<br />

proper convex bodies satisfying these conditions have the property that one of the<br />

bodies is contained in a congruent copy of the other body.<br />

While, at present, a complete solution of this problem seems to be out of reach, there<br />

are interesting contributions to it.<br />

Hadwiger’s Sufficient Condition for Containment<br />

As an application of the principal kinematic formula, we will prove the following<br />

result of Hadwiger [461], where A <strong>and</strong> P st<strong>and</strong> for area <strong>and</strong> perimeter.<br />

Theorem 7.11. Let C, D ∈ Cp(E 2 ).If<br />

2π � A(C) + A(D) � − P(C)P(D) >0 <strong>and</strong> A(C) �= A(D),<br />

then there is a rigid motion m such that either C ⊆ int mD or D ⊆ int mC.<br />

Proof. Assume first that C <strong>and</strong> D are proper convex polygons. If C ∩ mD =∅, then<br />

also bd C ∩ m bd D =∅. However, if C ∩ mD �= ∅, then there are two possibilities.<br />

The first possibility is that bd C ∩ m bd D �= ∅. If we disregard a set of rigid motions<br />

m of measure 0, then bd C ∩ m bd D consists of an even number of distinct points.<br />

The second possibility is that bd C ∩m bd D =∅. Then C ⊆ int mD or D ⊆ int mC.<br />

Suppose now that no congruent copy of C is contained in int D <strong>and</strong>, similarly,<br />

with C <strong>and</strong> D exchanged. In terms of the Euler characteristic this implies the<br />

following:<br />

χ(C ∩ mD) = 0 ⇒ χ(bd C ∩ m bd D) = 0,<br />

χ(C ∩ mD) = 1 ⇒ χ(bd C ∩ m bd D) ≥ 2<br />

for all m ∈ M with a set of exceptions of measure 0. Hence<br />

χ(bd C ∩ m bd D) ≥ 2 χ(C ∩ mD)<br />

for all m ∈ M with a set of exceptions of measure 0. Thus,<br />

�<br />

�<br />

χ(bd C ∩ m bd D) dµ(m) ≥ 2 χ(C ∩ mD) dµ(m),<br />

M<br />

or, by the principal kinematic formula 7.10 for d = 2 <strong>and</strong> the definition of Wi on<br />

L(C),<br />

M

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!