14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y (9), (4) <strong>and</strong> (7), or<br />

� �<br />

ci(mC) − ci(C) � Wi(D) = 0forD∈ C.<br />

i<br />

7 Valuations 139<br />

An argument that was used twice before, then shows that ci(mC) = ci(C), concluding<br />

the proof of (12).<br />

Having proved (10)–(12), Hadwiger’s functional theorem shows that<br />

(13) ci(·) = ci0W0(·) +···+cidWd(·) for C ∈ C<br />

with suitable coefficients cij.<br />

In the last step of the proof, the coefficients cij in (13) will be determined. This<br />

is done by applying (3), (9) <strong>and</strong> (13) to the special convex bodies λB d ,µBd , noting<br />

that ν is normalized <strong>and</strong> using Theorem 6.13 (ii):<br />

φ(λB d ,µB d �<br />

) = V � λB d − µ rB d� �<br />

dν(r) = V � (λ + µ)B d� dν(r)<br />

O(d)<br />

O(d)<br />

= V � (λ + µ)B d� = (λ + µ) d V (B d �<br />

� �<br />

d<br />

) = κd λ<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i µ d−i<br />

= �<br />

cijWi(λB d ) W j(µB d ) = �<br />

cijWi(B d ) W j(B d )λ d−i d− j<br />

µ<br />

i, j<br />

Hence:<br />

�d� κd i<br />

(14) cij = 0 for i + j �= d <strong>and</strong> ci d−i =<br />

Wi(B d ) Wd−i(B d ) =<br />

since Wi(B d ) = κd, by Steiner’s theorem on the volume of parallel bodies 6.6.<br />

Propositions (3), (9), (13) <strong>and</strong> (14) settle the theorem for C.<br />

To prove the theorem also for L(C), we proceed as follows: given a convex body<br />

C ∈ C <strong>and</strong> a rigid motion m, the valuations<br />

�<br />

χ(C ∩ m · ) dµ(m) <strong>and</strong> Wd−i(·)<br />

M<br />

on C are continuous <strong>and</strong> invariant with respect to proper rigid motions. By Groemer’s<br />

extension theorem 7.3, these valuations have unique extensions to L(C). Since their<br />

values for D1 ∪···∪ Dm ∈ L(C), where D j ∈ C, are determined by the inclusion–<br />

exclusion formula, (2) continues to hold for the given C <strong>and</strong> all D ∈ L(C). Thus<br />

(2) holds for all C ∈ C <strong>and</strong> D ∈ L(C). Then, given D ∈ L(C), a similar argument<br />

shows that (2) holds for all C ∈ L(C) <strong>and</strong> the given D ∈ L(C). Thus (2) holds for all<br />

C ∈ L(C) <strong>and</strong> D ∈ L(D), concluding the proof of the theorem. ⊓⊔<br />

Remark. For extensions of the principal kinematic formula to homogeneous spaces,<br />

see Howard [523] <strong>and</strong> Fu [345]. A comprehensive survey of more recent results<br />

on kinematic <strong>and</strong> Crofton type formulae in integral geometry is due to Hug <strong>and</strong><br />

Schneider [528].<br />

i, j<br />

�d� i<br />

κd

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!