14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 <strong>Convex</strong> Bodies<br />

Seventh,<br />

o<br />

v3<br />

v2<br />

v1<br />

(17) ψ(S) = 0 for each simplex S.<br />

Fig. 7.2. Proof of Proposition (17)<br />

v1 + v2 + v3<br />

Since ψ is simple, (17) holds if dim S ≤ d−1. Assume now that dim S = d <strong>and</strong> that o<br />

is a vertex of S.Letv1,...,vd denote the other vertices of S <strong>and</strong> let v = v1+···+vd.<br />

Let P ={λ1v1 +···+λdvd : 0 ≤ λi ≤ 1}. The hyperplanes through v1,...,vd<br />

<strong>and</strong> v − v1,...,v− vd , respectively, dissect P into S, a centrally symmetric convex<br />

polytope Q, <strong>and</strong> v − S. (16), (9), (16) <strong>and</strong> (10) then imply that<br />

0 = ψ(P) = ψ(S) + ψ(Q) + ψ(v − S) = 2ψ(S),<br />

hence ψ(S) = 0, concluding the proof of (17) (see Fig. 7.2).<br />

Finally, since each P ∈ P can be dissected into simplices, (9) <strong>and</strong> (17) show that<br />

ψ(P) = 0forP ∈ P. The continuity of ψ then implies that<br />

ψ(C) = 0forC ∈ C.<br />

This concludes the induction. The proof of (8) is finished.<br />

To complete the proof of the theorem, let ψ : C → R be defined by ψ(C) =<br />

φ(C) − cV(C) for C ∈ C, where c = φ([0, 1] d ). ψ is a valuation which satisfies the<br />

assumptions in (8). Thus ψ = 0, i.e. φ = cV, concluding the proof of the theorem.<br />

⊓⊔<br />

Remark. If, in this result, the group of proper rigid motions is replaced by the group<br />

of translations, then, besides the valuations of the form cV, many other valuations<br />

turn up. The situation on C thus is essentially more complicated than the situation on<br />

B, see Theorem 7.6.<br />

Hadwiger’s Functional Theorem<br />

The above characterizations of the volume will lead to an easy proof of Hadwiger’s<br />

[462, 464, 468] celebrated functional theorem. A preliminary version of this result is<br />

due to Blaschke [128], Sect. 4, who also provided the basic idea of proof. Unfortunately,<br />

Blaschke’s presentation was rather sloppy <strong>and</strong> it needed the genius of<br />

Hadwiger to recognize this treasure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!