14.02.2013 Views

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Then ψ, defined by<br />

f (s + t) = f (s) + f (t) for s, t ∈ R.<br />

ψ(B) = f (β − α) for B =[α, β] ∈B(E 1 ),<br />

7 Valuations 127<br />

is a simple, translation invariant valuation on B(E 1 ), but clearly not a multiple of the<br />

length.<br />

Remark. A similar result holds for L(B), where, by the continuity of a valuation on<br />

L(B), we mean continuity of its restriction to B.<br />

First Characterization of the Volume of <strong>Convex</strong> Bodies<br />

In the following we present a characterization of the volume on C, see Hadwiger<br />

[462,464,468]. Versions of this result in the context of Jordan <strong>and</strong> Lebesgue measure,<br />

respectively, Riemann <strong>and</strong> Lebesgue integrals are well known.<br />

Theorem 7.7. Let φ be a simple, translation invariant, monotone valuation on C.<br />

Then φ = c V , where c is a suitable constant.<br />

Proof. By replacing φ by −φ, if necessary, we may assume that<br />

(1) φ is non-decreasing <strong>and</strong> thus non-negative on C.<br />

An application of the above characterization theorem to the restriction of φ to B<br />

shows that<br />

(2) φ(B) = cV(B) for B ∈ B,<br />

where c is a suitable constant. By Theorem 7.2 φ has a unique extension to a valuation<br />

on L(B) which we also denote by φ. Similarly, cV is a valuation on L(B)<br />

which extends the valuation cV on B, see Propositions 7.1, 7.2. Since φ <strong>and</strong> cV<br />

coincide on B by (2), they must coincide on L(B) by Voll<strong>and</strong>’s polytope extension<br />

theorem 7.2:<br />

(3) φ(A) = cV(A) for A ∈ L(B).<br />

Voll<strong>and</strong>’s theorem, applied to the restriction of the valuation φ to the intersectional<br />

family P, shows that φ satisfies the inclusion–exclusion formula on P. Since<br />

φ is simple, we see that<br />

(4) φ is simply additive on P.<br />

We now show that<br />

(5) φ(A) ≤ φ(C) for A ∈ L(B), C ∈ C, where A ⊆ C.<br />

(Note that this is not trivial since in the theorem monotonicity is assumed only for<br />

C.) Given A, C, we have conv A ∈ P. Then A ⊆ conv A ⊆ C. Represent A in the<br />

form<br />

A = B1 ∪···∪ Bm, where Bi ∈ B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!