13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AX7.2.1.5 Metal Mixtures<br />

As discussed above, the <strong>EPA</strong>’s current approach <strong>for</strong> developing sediment criteria <strong>for</strong> Pb<br />

and other metals is to consider the molar sum <strong>of</strong> the metal concentrations (∑SEM). Although a<br />

similar approach has not been applied to AWQC, metal mixtures have been shown to be more<br />

toxic than individual metals (Spehar and Fiandt, 1986; Enserink et al., 1991). Spehar and Fiandt<br />

(1986) evaluated the acute and chronic toxicity <strong>of</strong> a metal mixture (arsenic, cadmium, chromium,<br />

copper, mercury, and Pb) to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and a daphnid<br />

(Ceriodaphnia dubia). In acute tests, the joint toxicity <strong>of</strong> these metals was observed to be more<br />

than additive <strong>for</strong> fathead minnows and nearly strictly additive <strong>for</strong> daphnids. In chronic tests, the<br />

joint toxicity <strong>of</strong> the metals was less than additive <strong>for</strong> fathead minnows and nearly strictly<br />

additive <strong>for</strong> daphnids. One approach <strong>for</strong> considering the additive toxicity <strong>of</strong> Pb with other metals<br />

is to use the concept <strong>of</strong> toxic units (TUs). Toxic units <strong>for</strong> each component <strong>of</strong> a metal mixture are<br />

derived by dividing metal concentrations by their respective acute or chronic criterion. The TUs<br />

<strong>for</strong> all the metals in the mixture are then summed. A ∑TU > 1.0 suggests the metal mixture is<br />

toxic (note that this is the same approach as discussed above <strong>for</strong> developing metal sediment<br />

criteria based on pore water concentrations). According to Norwood et al. (2003), the TU<br />

approach is presently the most appropriate model <strong>for</strong> predicting effects <strong>of</strong> metal mixtures based<br />

on the currently available toxicity data. However, it should also be emphasized that the TU<br />

approach is most appropriate at a screening level, because the true toxicity <strong>of</strong> the mixture is<br />

dependent on the relative amounts <strong>of</strong> each metal. The TU approach is also recommended with<br />

mixtures containing less than six metals.<br />

<strong>Lead</strong> and other metals <strong>of</strong>ten co-occur in sediments with other toxicants, such as organic<br />

contaminants. Effects-based sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) have been developed over the<br />

past 20 years to aid in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the relationships between complex chemical<br />

contamination and adverse biological effects (Long et al., 2006). Mean sediment quality<br />

guideline quotients (mSQGQs) can be calculated by dividing the concentrations <strong>of</strong> chemicals in<br />

sediments by their respective SQGs and then calculating the mean <strong>of</strong> the quotients <strong>for</strong> the<br />

individual chemicals. Long et al. (2006) per<strong>for</strong>med a critical review <strong>of</strong> this approach and found<br />

that it reasonably predicts the incidence and magnitude <strong>of</strong> toxicity in laboratory tests and the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> impairment to benthic communities increases incrementally with increasing<br />

mSQGQs. However, the authors pointed out some <strong>of</strong> the limitations <strong>of</strong> this approach, such as a<br />

AX7-116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!