13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

more natural conditions with vertical stratification <strong>of</strong> oxygen concentrations and, hence, varying<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> AVS. The authors concluded that important uncertainties remain in the application <strong>of</strong><br />

the AVS-SEM approach as a regulatory tool. Similarly, some studies suggest that AVS-SEM<br />

measurements in the natural environment must be interpreted cautiously as AVS can be quite<br />

variable with sediment depth and season (Van den Berg et al., 1998). Finally, Long et al. (1998)<br />

critically compared the ability <strong>of</strong> AVS-SEM and dry weight-normalized concentrations to predict<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> sediment-associated trace metals. Based on an analysis <strong>of</strong> 77 field-collected sediment<br />

samples, Long et al. (1998) found that dry weight-normalized concentrations were equally or<br />

slightly more accurate than AVS-SEM in predicting non-toxic and toxic results in laboratory<br />

bioassays. Long et al. suggests that a limitation <strong>of</strong> the AVS-SEM approach is that the criteria<br />

were not derived from field studies with mixture <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicals and thus may be less relevant<br />

to sites comprising complex chemical mixtures. Thus, although the AVS-SEM approach <strong>for</strong><br />

developing sediment quality criteria is being pursued by the U.S. <strong>EPA</strong>, there is clearly not<br />

scientific consensus on this approach, at least not <strong>for</strong> all circumstances.<br />

Many alternative approaches <strong>for</strong> developing sediment quality guidelines are based on<br />

empirical correlations between metal concentrations in sediment to associated biological effects,<br />

based on sediment toxicity tests (Long et al., 1995; Ingersoll et al., 1996; MacDonald et al.,<br />

2000). However, these guidelines are based on total metal concentrations in sediment and do not<br />

account <strong>for</strong> the bioavailability <strong>of</strong> metals between sediments. Sediment quality guidelines<br />

proposed <strong>for</strong> Pb from these other sources are shown in Table AX7-2.1.3.<br />

Table AX7-2.1.3. Recommended Sediment <strong>Quality</strong> Guidelines <strong>for</strong> <strong>Lead</strong><br />

Source Water Type Guideline Type Conc. (mg/kg dw)<br />

MacDonald et al. (2000) Freshwater TEC<br />

PEC<br />

Ingersoll et al. (1996) Freshwater ERL<br />

ERM<br />

Long et al. (1995) Saltwater ERL<br />

ERM<br />

AX7-115<br />

35.8<br />

128<br />

55<br />

99<br />

TEC = Threshold effect concentration; PEC = Probable effect concentration; ERL = Effects range – low;<br />

ERM = Effects range – median<br />

46.7<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!