13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

have included phosphoric acid (H3PO4), triple-super phosphate (TSP), phosphate rock, and/or<br />

hydroxyapatite (HA). Various studies have combined one or more <strong>of</strong> these phosphorous sources<br />

with or without lime, iron, and/or manganese in an attempt to enhance amendment qualities.<br />

Most amendments are <strong>for</strong>mulated to contain between 0.5 and 1.0% phosphorous by weight.<br />

They are then either applied wet or dry and then mixed or left unmixed with the contaminated<br />

soil. Success <strong>of</strong> phosphate amendments has been variable, and the degree <strong>of</strong> success appears to<br />

depend on available phosphorous and the dissolution rate <strong>of</strong> the original Pb species.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> potentially significant problems associated with phosphate amendments have<br />

been recognized, including both phyto- and earthworm toxicity (Ownby et al., 2005; Cao et al.,<br />

2002; and Rusek and Marshall, 2000). Both <strong>of</strong> these toxicities are primarily associated with very<br />

high applications <strong>of</strong> phosphorous and/or decreased soil pH. Indications <strong>of</strong> phytotoxicity are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten balanced by studies such as Zhu et al. (2004) that illustrate a 50 to 70% reduction in shoot-<br />

root uptake <strong>of</strong> Pb in phosphate-amended soils. Additionally, the added phosphate poses the<br />

potential risk <strong>of</strong> eutrophication <strong>of</strong> nearby waterways from soil run<strong>of</strong>f. Finally, Pb-contaminated<br />

soils from the extractive metals industry or agricultural sites <strong>of</strong>ten have elevated concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> arsenic. It has been shown (Impellitteri, 2005; Smith et al., 2002; Chaney and Ryan, 1994;<br />

and Ruby et al., 1994) that the addition <strong>of</strong> phosphate to such soils would enhance arsenic<br />

mobility (potentially moving arsenic down into the groundwater) through competitive anion<br />

exchange. Some data (Lenoble et al., 2005) indicate that if one could amend arsenic and Pb<br />

contaminated soils with iron(<strong>II</strong>I) phosphate this problem can be mitigated, however the increased<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> both phosphate and iron still exclude the application when drinking water is an<br />

issue.<br />

Biosolid Amendments<br />

Historically, biosolids have been used in the restoration <strong>of</strong> coal mines (Haering et al.,<br />

2000; Sopper, 1993). More recently, workers have demonstrated the feasibility <strong>of</strong> their use in<br />

the restoration <strong>of</strong> mine tailings (Brown et al., 2003a), and urban soils (Brown et al., 2003b;<br />

Farfel et al., 2005). Mine tailings are inherently difficult to remediate in that they pose numerous<br />

obstacles to plant growth. They are most <strong>of</strong>ten (1) acidic; (2) high in metal content, thus prone to<br />

phytotoxicity; (3) very low in organic content; and (4) deficient in macro- and micronutrients.<br />

AX7-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!