13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AX6-192<br />

Table AX6-7.3. Key Studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lead</strong> Exposure and Cancer in the General Population<br />

Reference, Study<br />

Location, and Period Study Description Pb Measurement Findings and Interpretation<br />

United States<br />

Jemal et al. (2002)<br />

(same cohort as in<br />

Lustberg and<br />

Silbergeld, 2002<br />

except <strong>for</strong> inclusion<br />

criteria)<br />

U.S.<br />

1976-1992.<br />

Cohort design.<br />

3,592 white participants from the<br />

1976-1980 NHANES <strong>II</strong> survey who<br />

had blood Pb measured at entry.<br />

Mortality was followed through 1992<br />

via NDI and SSADMF.<br />

RRs were calculated <strong>for</strong> the various<br />

exposure groups compared to survey<br />

participants with the lowest exposure,<br />

adjusted <strong>for</strong> age and smoking.<br />

Blood Pb (µg/dL) was measured<br />

by atomic absorption and used to<br />

classify subjects into exposure<br />

quartiles or groups above vs.<br />

below median exposure.<br />

Median blood Pb 12 µg/dL.<br />

RR (95% CI); number <strong>of</strong> deaths<br />

Lung (above vs. below median):<br />

Total cohort 1.5 (0.7, 2.9); 71<br />

Male 1.2 (0.6, 2.5); 52<br />

Female 2.5 (0.7, 8.4); 19<br />

Stomach (above vs. below median):<br />

Total cohort 2.4 (0.3, 19.1); 5<br />

Male 3.1 (0.3, 37.4); 4<br />

Female no deaths in referent group<br />

All cancer: total cohort by quartile (age-adjusted) 1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5<br />

(p = 0.16 <strong>for</strong> trend).<br />

Smoking was controlled <strong>for</strong>. Pb levels occurring in the general population<br />

were examined, not just those in workers with high occupational exposure<br />

potential. Exposure to other carcinogens were not examined. Potential <strong>for</strong><br />

residual confounding by degree and duration <strong>of</strong> smoking exists (only<br />

controlled <strong>for</strong> never, <strong>for</strong>mer, current

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!