13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AX6-190<br />

Table AX6-7.2 (cont’d). Key Occupational Studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lead</strong> Exposure and Cancer<br />

Reference, Study<br />

Location, and Period Study Description Pb Measurement Findings and Interpretation<br />

Europe (cont’d)<br />

Lundström et al.<br />

(1997)<br />

(follow-up <strong>of</strong><br />

Gerhardsson et al.<br />

(1986)<br />

(see also subcohort<br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> Englyst<br />

et al., 2001).<br />

Sweden<br />

1928-1987<br />

Englyst et al. (2001)<br />

(follow-up and subanalysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lundström<br />

et al., 1997).<br />

Sweden<br />

1928-1987<br />

Cohort design.<br />

3,979 copper and Pb smelter workers.<br />

Standardized mortality and incidence<br />

ratios were computed <strong>for</strong> workers<br />

compared with age-, yr-, gender-, and<br />

county-specific rates <strong>for</strong> the general<br />

population.<br />

Nested cohort analysis.<br />

Limited to 1,093 workers in the<br />

smelter’s Pb department, followed<br />

through 1997.<br />

Incidence was compared with county<br />

rates; age-specific SIRs with 15-yr lag.<br />

For some analyses, the entire cohort<br />

was treated as exposed. For others,<br />

job histories were used to single out<br />

1,992 workers belonging to<br />

departments thought to be exposed to<br />

“Pb only.” Mean blood Pb<br />

monitoring test results across time<br />

were used to single out a “highly<br />

exposed” group <strong>of</strong> 1,026 workers<br />

with blood Pb levels ≥10 µmol/L<br />

[≥207 µg/dL].<br />

Mean blood Pb 60 µg/dL in 1959.<br />

Workers were divided into<br />

Subcohorts I and <strong>II</strong> <strong>for</strong> ever and<br />

never worked in areas generally<br />

associated with exposure to arsenic<br />

or other known carcinogens (701 and<br />

383 workers, respectively).<br />

Detailed individual assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

arsenic exposure was made <strong>for</strong> all<br />

lung-cancer cases.<br />

SMR (95% CI); number <strong>of</strong> deaths<br />

Lung:<br />

Total cohort 2.8 (2.0, 3.8); 39<br />

Highly exposed 2.8 (1.8, 4.5); 19<br />

SIR (95% CI); number <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

Lung with 15-yr lag:<br />

Total cohort 2.9 (2.1, 4.0); 42<br />

Highly exposed 3.4 (2.2, 5.2); 23<br />

Pb-only 3.1 (1.7, 5.2); 14<br />

Pb-only highly exposed 5.1 (2.0, 10.5); 7<br />

Other highly exposed (total cohort), with 15-yr lag:<br />

Brain 1.6 (0.4, 4.2); 4<br />

Renal pelvis, ureter, bladder 1.8 (0.8, 3.4); 9<br />

Kidney 0.9 (0.2, 2.5); 3<br />

All cancer 1.1 (0.9, 1.4); 83<br />

No control <strong>for</strong> smoking.<br />

SIR (95% CI); number <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

Subcohort I (coexposed):<br />

Lung 2.4 (1.2, 4.5); 10<br />

Subcohort <strong>II</strong> (not coexposed):<br />

Lung 3.6 (1.2, 8.3); 5<br />

Subjects with lung cancer found to have history <strong>of</strong> “considerable”<br />

exposure to arsenic: 9/10 among Subcohort I, 4/5 among<br />

Subcohort <strong>II</strong>.<br />

No control <strong>for</strong> smoking.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!