13.02.2013 Views

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

Air Quality Criteria for Lead Volume II of II - (NEPIS)(EPA) - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AX6-166<br />

Table AX6-5.4. Cardiovascular Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lead</strong> on Children<br />

Reference, Study<br />

Location, and Period Study Description Pb Measurement Findings, Interpretation<br />

United States<br />

Chen et al. (2006)<br />

U.S.-Baltimore, MD;<br />

Cincinnati, OH;<br />

Newark, NJ;<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

~1998-2004<br />

780 children from 12-33 mos participated<br />

in a randomized clinical trial <strong>of</strong> oral<br />

succimer chelation in four clinical<br />

centers. Half the children had up to three<br />

26-day treatments, the other half were<br />

given placebo. 75% got two treatment<br />

sessions and 81% <strong>of</strong> those with two<br />

treatments received a third.<br />

Blood pressure was measured pretreatment,<br />

at 7, 28, and 42 days after each<br />

treatment, then every 3 to 4 mos <strong>for</strong> five<br />

yrs <strong>of</strong> follow up. Cross-sectional<br />

multiple regression models adjusting <strong>for</strong><br />

clinic location, baseline linear Pb, race,<br />

sex, parents’ education, single parent, age<br />

at test, height at test, and BMI at test <strong>for</strong><br />

each period <strong>of</strong> the study tested the<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> diastolic and systolic blood<br />

pressure between placebo and succimer<br />

groups. Cross-sectional multiple<br />

regression models <strong>for</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> linear<br />

blood Pb at each period on blood<br />

pressure adjusted <strong>for</strong> clinic location,<br />

treatment group, race, sex, parents’<br />

education, single parent, age at test,<br />

height and BMI. Two mixed models,<br />

one from start <strong>of</strong> treatment to 9-mo<br />

follow up, the other from 12 to 60 mos<br />

follow up, adjusted <strong>for</strong> the same<br />

variables, and tested the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment group over time.<br />

Blood Pb ranged from<br />

20-44 µg/dL at pre-treatment<br />

and from 1-27 µg/dL at 5 yr<br />

follow up. Succimer-treated<br />

group had significantly<br />

lower blood Pb than placebo<br />

group only <strong>for</strong> 9-10 mos<br />

following the end <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment. Blood Pb did not<br />

differ significantly beyond<br />

that period.<br />

Adjusted systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the succimer<br />

group than the placebo group at 36 mos (1.27 mm Hg [95% CI: 0.06,<br />

2.48]) and at 60 mos follow up (1.69 mm Hg [95% CI: 0.34, 3.04]).<br />

Systolic blood pressure was not significantly different at any other time<br />

period; diastolic blood pressure was never significantly different between<br />

groups.<br />

Concurrent linear blood Pb was not associated with blood pressure in<br />

cross-sectional models at any time point in the study. Adjusted<br />

coefficients <strong>for</strong> linear blood Pb and systolic blood pressure ranged from<br />

1.36 mm Hg (95% CI: !0.58, 3.30) at pre-treatment to !0.72 mm Hg (95%<br />

CI: !1.91, 0.48) at 36 mos <strong>of</strong> follow up. Diastolic pressure coefficients<br />

were generally lower but followed the same pattern.<br />

Mixed model analysis <strong>for</strong> start <strong>of</strong> treatment through 9 mos follow up<br />

showed succimer treatment effect <strong>of</strong> 0.24 mm Hg (95% CI: !0.79, 1.28)<br />

<strong>for</strong> systolic and 0.46 mm Hg (95% CI: !0.44, 1.36) <strong>for</strong> diastolic blood<br />

pressure. The treatment effect from 12 through 60 mos follow up was<br />

1.09 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.27, 1.90) systolic and 0.15 mm Hg (95% CI:<br />

!0.45, 0.75) <strong>for</strong> diastolic blood pressure.<br />

The only reliable effect <strong>of</strong> succimer treatment was an elevation <strong>of</strong> systolic<br />

blood pressure, especially notable between three and five yrs post<br />

treatment. The authors could not account <strong>for</strong> the apparent increase in<br />

blood pressure in the succimer-treated group 3-5 yrs after treatment ended.<br />

It is notable that the two groups had different mean blood Pb <strong>for</strong> less than<br />

a yr after succimer treatment ended, a period perhaps too short to observe<br />

any beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> treatment. Failure to find cross-sectional effects <strong>of</strong><br />

blood Pb on blood pressure, especially pre-treatment, may indicate that Pb<br />

exposure <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> less than three yrs after birth is not sufficient to<br />

affect blood pressure or that blood pressure measurements in the first three<br />

yrs <strong>of</strong> life are highly variable, as could be seen from scatter plots <strong>of</strong> blood<br />

pressure vs. blood Pb at pre-treatment compared 60 mo follow up. The<br />

use <strong>of</strong> linear Pb term may have reduced sensitivity to finding a significant<br />

blood Pb effect on blood pressure. No model diagnostics mentioned.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!