A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine Hispanic surnames appear on the list. Organizational Efforts in Canada In Canada, most of the early Pentecostal leaders had accepted the Jesus Name message. Some leaders— including R. E. McAlister, George A. Chambers, R. E. Sternall, Frank Small, and Howard Goss—began meeting in 1917 to plan a Canadian organization. (Goss was pastor in Picton, Ontario, at the time.) Their intention was to work closely with the Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, so they named their organization the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada (PAOC). 89 Indeed, Chambers and Goss were listed as PAW ministers for 1919-20. The two most influential organizers were Chambers, the first general chairman (superintendent), and McAlister, the first secretary-treasurer. The group did not formally obtain a federal charter until 1919. Much like the Assemblies of God in 1914, in the first meeting of the board of trustees the PAOC voted not to adopt a doctrinal statement as a basis of fellowship. Between 1917 and 1920, however, a shift took place away from the Oneness position, with both Chambers and McAlister repudiating the doctrine. The first general assembly, held in November 1919 and attended by 31 ministers and lay delegates, issued the following statement: “We recognize a three-fold relationship of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost being clearly taught in the New Testament. . . . As to baptism, we feel like leaving the matter of formula with the individual.” 90 In late 1919 some independent Pentecostal churches in western Canada joined the Assemblies of God. In 1920, the PAOC itself affiliated with the Assemblies of God. Although this 92
Oneness Pentecostal Organizations formal association was short-lived (until 1925), it marked the transition to a definitely trinitarian organization. Frank Small, one of the founders of the PAOC, felt betrayed by this change of doctrine and affiliation. In 1921, he led ten Oneness ministers out of the PAOC and founded the Apostolic Church of Pentecost of Canada (ACPC) as a Oneness organization. It is unique among historic Oneness organizations in that it teaches unconditional eternal security, which Small strongly advocated. In 1953, the ACPC was joined by the Evangelical Churches of Pentecost, a group that included many who taught “the triunity of the Godhead” (in distinction to the trinity). Consequently, there is considerable latitude on the doctrine of God, but the key points of identity are the Pentecostal experience, baptism in Jesus’ name, and eternal security. In 1998, the reported constituency in Canada was 14,000 and worldwide was 42,000. Almost all the Pentecostals in the Maritime Provinces embraced the Oneness message. Most of them joined the ACPC and then later went to the United Pentecostal Church, which is now the largest Oneness group in Canada. A number of Oneness ministers, particularly in Ontario, stayed in the PAOC until the leadership forced them out in 1940. Most of them also eventually joined the United Pentecostal Church. Racial Division Back in the United States, the segregation laws of the South put tremendous pressure on the PAW. Most of the black ministers resided in the North, and all conferences had to be held in the North due to segregated accommodations in the South. Most Southern ministers, however, 93
- Page 41 and 42: The Finished Work Controversy Pinso
- Page 43 and 44: The Finished Work Controversy Due t
- Page 45 and 46: The Finished Work Controversy “Th
- Page 47 and 48: The Finished Work Controversy The F
- Page 49 and 50: The Finished Work Controversy Never
- Page 51 and 52: The Finished Work Controversy Durha
- Page 53 and 54: The Finished Work Controversy that
- Page 55 and 56: The Finished Work Controversy for e
- Page 57 and 58: The Finished Work Controversy resul
- Page 59 and 60: 3 The Jesus Name Controversy The se
- Page 61 and 62: The Jesus Name Controversy scholar,
- Page 63 and 64: The Jesus Name Controversy was “t
- Page 65 and 66: The Jesus Name Controversy eral peo
- Page 67 and 68: The Jesus Name Controversy assistan
- Page 69 and 70: The Jesus Name Controversy who had
- Page 71 and 72: The Jesus Name Controversy enced Ew
- Page 73 and 74: The Jesus Name Controversy form an
- Page 75 and 76: The Jesus Name Controversy Fauss to
- Page 77 and 78: The Jesus Name Controversy fought s
- Page 79 and 80: The Jesus Name Controversy attendan
- Page 81 and 82: The Jesus Name Controversy but ‘l
- Page 83 and 84: The Jesus Name Controversy I want t
- Page 85 and 86: The Jesus Name Controversy Christ a
- Page 87 and 88: The Jesus Name Controversy people e
- Page 89 and 90: 4 Oneness Pentecostal Organizations
- Page 91: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations t
- Page 95 and 96: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations W
- Page 97 and 98: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations m
- Page 99 and 100: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations I
- Page 101 and 102: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations p
- Page 103 and 104: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations C
- Page 105 and 106: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations i
- Page 107 and 108: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations M
- Page 109 and 110: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations p
- Page 111 and 112: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations w
- Page 113 and 114: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations t
- Page 115 and 116: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations N
- Page 117 and 118: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations j
- Page 119 and 120: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations b
- Page 121 and 122: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations i
- Page 123: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations b
- Page 126 and 127: A History of Christian Doctrine ton
- Page 128 and 129: A History of Christian Doctrine den
- Page 130 and 131: A History of Christian Doctrine tri
- Page 132 and 133: A History of Christian Doctrine 5,3
- Page 134 and 135: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 136 and 137: A History of Christian Doctrine wat
- Page 138 and 139: A History of Christian Doctrine lat
- Page 140 and 141: A History of Christian Doctrine gro
Oneness Pentecostal Organizations<br />
formal association was short-lived (until 1925), it marked<br />
the transition to a definitely trinitarian organization.<br />
Frank Small, one <strong>of</strong> the founders <strong>of</strong> the PAOC, felt<br />
betrayed by this change <strong>of</strong> doctrine and affiliation. In<br />
1921, he led ten Oneness ministers out <strong>of</strong> the PAOC and<br />
founded the Apostolic Church <strong>of</strong> Pentecost <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />
(ACPC) as a Oneness organization. It is unique among<br />
historic Oneness organizations in that it teaches unconditional<br />
eternal security, which Small strongly advocated. In<br />
1953, the ACPC was joined by the Evangelical Churches<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pentecost, a group that included many who taught “the<br />
triunity <strong>of</strong> the Godhead” (in distinction to the trinity).<br />
Consequently, there is considerable latitude on the doctrine<br />
<strong>of</strong> God, but the key points <strong>of</strong> identity are the<br />
Pentecostal experience, baptism in Jesus’ name, and eternal<br />
security. In 1998, the reported constituency in Canada<br />
was 14,000 and worldwide was 42,000.<br />
Almost all the Pentecostals in the Maritime Provinces<br />
embraced the Oneness message. Most <strong>of</strong> them joined the<br />
ACPC and then later went to the United Pentecostal<br />
Church, which is now the largest Oneness group in<br />
Canada. A number <strong>of</strong> Oneness ministers, particularly in<br />
Ontario, stayed in the PAOC until the leadership forced<br />
them out in 1940. Most <strong>of</strong> them also eventually joined the<br />
United Pentecostal Church.<br />
Racial Division<br />
Back in the United States, the segregation laws <strong>of</strong> the<br />
South put tremendous pressure on the PAW. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
black ministers resided in the North, and all conferences<br />
had to be held in the North due to segregated accommodations<br />
in the South. Most Southern ministers, however,<br />
93