A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine Because of his new convictions, Ewart parted company with Fisher and Garr. He pitched a tent (which Fisher helped him obtain) and began meetings in Belvedere, California, just outside Los Angeles. Glenn Cook agreed with Ewart’s message, and they decided to work together. On April 15, 1914—exactly one year after the Arroyo Seco camp meeting began—Ewart preached his first sermon on Acts 2:38. He proclaimed that the full message of salvation consists of repentance, water baptism in Jesus’ name, and the baptism of the Holy Ghost, and he associated baptism in Jesus’ name with the oneness of God in Christ. Then Ewart baptized Cook in the name of Jesus Christ, and Cook baptized Ewart. This action—the first rebaptisms in the name of Jesus Christ— was the decisive step in starting Oneness Pentecostalism as a distinct movement. Frank Small, quoted with approval by Ewart, later explained the doctrinal significance of rebaptism in Jesus’ name: 69 68 Through the illumination of Scripture, the new message had resolved itself into the fullness of God in Christ (II Corinthians 5:19; I Thessalonians 5:18; I Timothy 3:16). This teaching developed in Los Angeles. It might be stated that until this time, the message of water baptism in the Name of Jesus had been based on record only. We knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that the apostles had baptized in the Name of Jesus, but we still did not fully understand why. But, in due time when complete scriptural revelation came, the absolute fullness of God in Christ was proven. Out of the development of this truth came the act of re-baptizing converts
The Jesus Name Controversy who had previously been baptized using the titles Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The Spread of the Jesus Name Message A great revival broke out under Ewart and Cook in the Los Angeles area. Ewart reported: 70 All kinds of incurable diseases were healed in the Name of Jesus, and people were filled with the Holy Ghost, speaking in other tongues. One of the greatest, most startling characteristics of that great revival was that the vast majority of the new converts were filled with the Holy Ghost after coming up out of the water. They would leave the tank speaking in other tongues. Many were healed when they were baptized. Many missionaries and preachers came to the meetings and were rebaptized in Jesus’ name. Even more significantly, Ewart’s periodical, Meat in Due Season, carried the Jesus Name message and reports of the revival far and wide. Many more people were touched and converted by the paper than by the revival itself. Missionaries to China, Japan, and India were soon baptized in Jesus’ name. During this revival, Ewart endured much opposition from local church people as well as from a gang of hoodlums. The latter threatened him and his wife on numerous occasions, planted “stink bombs” in the services, and even burned down the tent. The town constable did nothing to protect them, but the persecution ended when the gang leader was converted. Ewart had to 69
- Page 17 and 18: The Pentecostal Movement could inhe
- Page 19 and 20: The Pentecostal Movement teaching h
- Page 21 and 22: The Pentecostal Movement waiting up
- Page 23 and 24: The Pentecostal Movement demonstrat
- Page 25 and 26: The Pentecostal Movement strange gu
- Page 27 and 28: The Pentecostal Movement Here you f
- Page 29 and 30: The Pentecostal Movement sanctifica
- Page 31 and 32: The Pentecostal Movement • After
- Page 33 and 34: The Pentecostal Movement Father, So
- Page 35 and 36: The Pentecostal Movement Parham, ot
- Page 37 and 38: The Pentecostal Movement greatly to
- Page 39 and 40: 2 The Finished Work Controversy The
- Page 41 and 42: The Finished Work Controversy Pinso
- Page 43 and 44: The Finished Work Controversy Due t
- Page 45 and 46: The Finished Work Controversy “Th
- Page 47 and 48: The Finished Work Controversy The F
- Page 49 and 50: The Finished Work Controversy Never
- Page 51 and 52: The Finished Work Controversy Durha
- Page 53 and 54: The Finished Work Controversy that
- Page 55 and 56: The Finished Work Controversy for e
- Page 57 and 58: The Finished Work Controversy resul
- Page 59 and 60: 3 The Jesus Name Controversy The se
- Page 61 and 62: The Jesus Name Controversy scholar,
- Page 63 and 64: The Jesus Name Controversy was “t
- Page 65 and 66: The Jesus Name Controversy eral peo
- Page 67: The Jesus Name Controversy assistan
- Page 71 and 72: The Jesus Name Controversy enced Ew
- Page 73 and 74: The Jesus Name Controversy form an
- Page 75 and 76: The Jesus Name Controversy Fauss to
- Page 77 and 78: The Jesus Name Controversy fought s
- Page 79 and 80: The Jesus Name Controversy attendan
- Page 81 and 82: The Jesus Name Controversy but ‘l
- Page 83 and 84: The Jesus Name Controversy I want t
- Page 85 and 86: The Jesus Name Controversy Christ a
- Page 87 and 88: The Jesus Name Controversy people e
- Page 89 and 90: 4 Oneness Pentecostal Organizations
- Page 91 and 92: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations t
- Page 93 and 94: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations f
- Page 95 and 96: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations W
- Page 97 and 98: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations m
- Page 99 and 100: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations I
- Page 101 and 102: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations p
- Page 103 and 104: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations C
- Page 105 and 106: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations i
- Page 107 and 108: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations M
- Page 109 and 110: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations p
- Page 111 and 112: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations w
- Page 113 and 114: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations t
- Page 115 and 116: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations N
- Page 117 and 118: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations j
A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />
Because <strong>of</strong> his new convictions, Ewart parted company<br />
with Fisher and Garr. He pitched a tent (which<br />
Fisher helped him obtain) and began meetings in<br />
Belvedere, California, just outside Los Angeles. Glenn<br />
Cook agreed with Ewart’s message, and they decided to<br />
work together. On April 15, 1914—exactly one year after<br />
the Arroyo Seco camp meeting began—Ewart preached<br />
his first sermon on Acts 2:38. He proclaimed that the full<br />
message <strong>of</strong> salvation consists <strong>of</strong> repentance, water baptism<br />
in Jesus’ name, and the baptism <strong>of</strong> the Holy Ghost,<br />
and he associated baptism in Jesus’ name with the oneness<br />
<strong>of</strong> God in Christ. Then Ewart baptized Cook in the<br />
name <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, and Cook baptized Ewart. This<br />
action—the first rebaptisms in the name <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ—<br />
was the decisive step in starting Oneness Pentecostalism<br />
as a distinct movement.<br />
Frank Small, quoted with approval by Ewart, later<br />
explained the doctrinal significance <strong>of</strong> rebaptism in<br />
Jesus’ name: 69<br />
68<br />
Through the illumination <strong>of</strong> Scripture, the new message<br />
had resolved itself into the fullness <strong>of</strong> God in Christ<br />
(II Corinthians 5:19; I Thessalonians 5:18; I Timothy<br />
3:16). This teaching developed in Los Angeles. It might<br />
be stated that until this time, the message <strong>of</strong> water baptism<br />
in the Name <strong>of</strong> Jesus had been based on record<br />
only. We knew beyond a shadow <strong>of</strong> a doubt that the<br />
apostles had baptized in the Name <strong>of</strong> Jesus, but we still<br />
did not fully understand why. But, in due time when<br />
complete scriptural revelation came, the absolute fullness<br />
<strong>of</strong> God in Christ was proven. Out <strong>of</strong> the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> this truth came the act <strong>of</strong> re-baptizing converts