A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine we are immediately cleansed and set apart from sin and given a holy nature. The old nature still resides within us, however. Therefore, sanctification must also be progressive. We must continue to pursue holiness (sanctification) unto the coming of the Lord (Hebrews 12:14). As we walk in the Spirit, we become more and more like Christ and less and less like the world. “But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord” (II Corinthians 3:18, NKJV). The ultimate goal of this process of sanctification is perfection at the coming of the Lord: “Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ” (I Thessalonians 5:23, NKJV). Conclusions Despite his short Pentecostal ministry of five years, William Durham was a powerful, unusually anointed preacher who exerted tremendous and lasting influence within the developing Pentecostal movement. The Finished Work doctrine was not unique to him, of course. In a general sense it was characteristic of mainline Protestant theology. A century before, most Methodists had abandoned the idea of sanctification as a second work of grace, and some non-Pentecostal contemporaries of Durham in the Holiness movement had formulated essentially the same doctrine in their own context. Nevertheless, Durham almost single-handedly introduced this message to Pentecostals, redirected the course of the movement, and broadened its theological appeal. As a 56
The Finished Work Controversy result, the majority of Pentecostals adopted basically the Keswick position of two experiences—conversion and baptism of the Holy Spirit as an endowment of power— yet with the important distinction of tongues as the initial evidence of the Spirit. Of equal importance is the contribution that Durham made toward the development of the Jesus Name movement. Although he died a little over one year before its emergence, he set the stage for Oneness Pentecostal theology in several important ways: 1. He taught that we can receive all the benefits of the Atonement by repentance and faith, without waiting for a subsequent experience. While he retained the idea of two experiences (conversion and Spirit baptism), he acknowledged that when there is full scriptural understanding and faith we can expect the baptism of the Spirit to come immediately. 2. While some Pentecostals during and after his day sought to modify the distinctive doctrine of the Holy Ghost baptism, Durham staunchly affirmed the original teaching of Parham and Seymour that receiving the Holy Ghost is necessary to enter into the New Testament church and that speaking in tongues is the initial evidence. 3. He established Acts 2:38 as the paradigm for New Testament salvation, and he equated the three steps of repentance, water baptism, and the baptism of the Holy Ghost with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. 4. He stressed the importance of water baptism, and he exalted the name of Jesus. 5. He had a major influence on future leaders of the 57
- Page 7 and 8: Preface This book surveys the histo
- Page 9 and 10: 1 The Pentecostal Movement The firs
- Page 11 and 12: The Pentecostal Movement As people
- Page 13 and 14: The Pentecostal Movement January 1,
- Page 15 and 16: The Pentecostal Movement Pentecost
- Page 17 and 18: The Pentecostal Movement could inhe
- Page 19 and 20: The Pentecostal Movement teaching h
- Page 21 and 22: The Pentecostal Movement waiting up
- Page 23 and 24: The Pentecostal Movement demonstrat
- Page 25 and 26: The Pentecostal Movement strange gu
- Page 27 and 28: The Pentecostal Movement Here you f
- Page 29 and 30: The Pentecostal Movement sanctifica
- Page 31 and 32: The Pentecostal Movement • After
- Page 33 and 34: The Pentecostal Movement Father, So
- Page 35 and 36: The Pentecostal Movement Parham, ot
- Page 37 and 38: The Pentecostal Movement greatly to
- Page 39 and 40: 2 The Finished Work Controversy The
- Page 41 and 42: The Finished Work Controversy Pinso
- Page 43 and 44: The Finished Work Controversy Due t
- Page 45 and 46: The Finished Work Controversy “Th
- Page 47 and 48: The Finished Work Controversy The F
- Page 49 and 50: The Finished Work Controversy Never
- Page 51 and 52: The Finished Work Controversy Durha
- Page 53 and 54: The Finished Work Controversy that
- Page 55: The Finished Work Controversy for e
- Page 59 and 60: 3 The Jesus Name Controversy The se
- Page 61 and 62: The Jesus Name Controversy scholar,
- Page 63 and 64: The Jesus Name Controversy was “t
- Page 65 and 66: The Jesus Name Controversy eral peo
- Page 67 and 68: The Jesus Name Controversy assistan
- Page 69 and 70: The Jesus Name Controversy who had
- Page 71 and 72: The Jesus Name Controversy enced Ew
- Page 73 and 74: The Jesus Name Controversy form an
- Page 75 and 76: The Jesus Name Controversy Fauss to
- Page 77 and 78: The Jesus Name Controversy fought s
- Page 79 and 80: The Jesus Name Controversy attendan
- Page 81 and 82: The Jesus Name Controversy but ‘l
- Page 83 and 84: The Jesus Name Controversy I want t
- Page 85 and 86: The Jesus Name Controversy Christ a
- Page 87 and 88: The Jesus Name Controversy people e
- Page 89 and 90: 4 Oneness Pentecostal Organizations
- Page 91 and 92: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations t
- Page 93 and 94: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations f
- Page 95 and 96: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations W
- Page 97 and 98: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations m
- Page 99 and 100: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations I
- Page 101 and 102: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations p
- Page 103 and 104: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations C
- Page 105 and 106: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations i
A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />
we are immediately cleansed and set apart from sin and<br />
given a holy nature. The old nature still resides within us,<br />
however. Therefore, sanctification must also be progressive.<br />
We must continue to pursue holiness (sanctification)<br />
unto the coming <strong>of</strong> the Lord (Hebrews 12:14). As<br />
we walk in the Spirit, we become more and more like<br />
Christ and less and less like the world. “But we all, with<br />
unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lord, are being transformed into the same image from<br />
glory to glory, just as by the Spirit <strong>of</strong> the Lord” (II Corinthians<br />
3:18, NKJV). The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> this process <strong>of</strong><br />
sanctification is perfection at the coming <strong>of</strong> the Lord:<br />
“Now may the God <strong>of</strong> peace Himself sanctify you completely;<br />
and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved<br />
blameless at the coming <strong>of</strong> our Lord Jesus Christ”<br />
(I Thessalonians 5:23, NKJV).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Despite his short Pentecostal ministry <strong>of</strong> five years,<br />
William Durham was a powerful, unusually anointed<br />
preacher who exerted tremendous and lasting influence<br />
within the developing Pentecostal movement. The<br />
Finished Work doctrine was not unique to him, <strong>of</strong> course.<br />
In a general sense it was characteristic <strong>of</strong> mainline<br />
Protestant theology. A century before, most Methodists<br />
had abandoned the idea <strong>of</strong> sanctification as a second<br />
work <strong>of</strong> grace, and some non-Pentecostal contemporaries<br />
<strong>of</strong> Durham in the Holiness movement had formulated<br />
essentially the same doctrine in their own context.<br />
Nevertheless, Durham almost single-handedly introduced<br />
this message to Pentecostals, redirected the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
movement, and broadened its theological appeal. As a<br />
56