13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix D<br />

authority, yet he renounces their authority when it comes to<br />

water baptism.<br />

Similarly, the booklet says that the holiness teachings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UPCI “are strange and legalistic and lack biblical ground” (page<br />

74), yet it ignores the strong teachings <strong>of</strong> ancient writers such<br />

as Tertullian and Cyprian on this very subject. While embracing<br />

John Calvin’s doctrine <strong>of</strong> predestination, the booklet says nothing<br />

about Calvin’s teachings on practical holiness and the laws<br />

he promulgated on this subject in Geneva, which were stricter<br />

than the voluntary disciplines that the UPCI has adopted in obedience<br />

to the Scriptures.<br />

• The presentation <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the trinity suffers<br />

from the classic weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the doctrine, namely tendencies<br />

toward tritheism and subordinationism. Many trinitarians<br />

will have problems affirming his views in this area.<br />

For instance, the booklet argues strongly that the Godhead<br />

is a substance that subsists in three centers <strong>of</strong> consciousness.<br />

“The term person can properly denote self-conscious things<br />

other than human beings, such as angels, demons, imaginary<br />

self-conscious beings, and each <strong>of</strong> the three persons <strong>of</strong> God”<br />

(page 47). Interestingly, A Handbook <strong>of</strong> Theological Terms<br />

asserts, “No important <strong>Christian</strong> theologian has argued that<br />

there are three self-conscious beings in the godhead,” 349 but this<br />

booklet certainly comes close to doing so.<br />

One passage <strong>of</strong> Scripture seems to give the author particular<br />

trouble: “Now the Lord is that Spirit” (II Corinthians 3:17).<br />

To avoid saying that “the Spirit” here is the Holy Spirit, he<br />

argues that there are at least two divine Spirits, “the Holy<br />

Spirit” and “the spirit that is God’s substance”: “There are many<br />

spirits other than the Holy Spirit, both literal (e.g., angels,<br />

demons, the spirits <strong>of</strong> men, and the spirit that is God’s substance<br />

[John 4:24]) and metaphorical” (page 34).<br />

To avoid saying that “the Lord” in II Corinthians 3:17 is<br />

Jesus, he indicates that Jesus and Jehovah are not the same<br />

being and that there is more than one divine Lord: “The word<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!