A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

ntslibrary.com
from ntslibrary.com More from this publisher
13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine It is evident that the author and publisher wish to portray Oneness Pentecostals as cultists and false religionists. The booklet is one of the newest in a series by various authors entitled Zondervan Guide to Cults and Religious Movements. On the cover, the most prominent word in this series title is Cults. The introductory booklet to the series is Unmasking the Cults. The last booklet in the series summarizes all the movements studied, and its title is Truth and Error: Comparative Charts of Cults and Christianity. The other twelve titles in the series are Jehovah’s Witnesses; Masonic Lodge; Mormonism; New Age Movement; Satanism; Unification Church; Mind Sciences; Astrology and Psychic Phenomena; Buddhism, Taoism and Other Far Eastern Religions; Goddess Worship, Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism; Hinduism, TM and Hare Krishna; and Unitarian Universalism. Classifying Oneness Pentecostals with these groups implies a spiritual similarity and a common satanic origin. At the least, it seems that the author and publisher discredit all Oneness Pentecostal experiences with God. But how can they venture to make such a judgment with no indication that they have ever attended Oneness Pentecostal worship services or interacted significantly with Oneness Pentecostals on a personal level? How can they seemingly denigrate all faith, repentance, reception of the Holy Spirit, spiritual gifts, and spiritual fruit among Oneness Pentecostals while apparently accepting the same manifestations among Trinitarian Pentecostals? Have they no concern that they could be ascribing works of the Holy Spirit to Satan, something Jesus warned strongly against in Matthew 12:22-32? In this connection, it is noteworthy that many Oneness Pentecostals first believed on the Lord, repented, or received the Holy Spirit in trinitarian churches and then continued serving the Lord in Oneness churches. The author’s willingness to excoriate Oneness Pentecostals for their doctrine of God is particularly surprising in light of views expressed in his book God in Three Persons: 335 348

Appendix D Monarchianism is represented today by the United (“Jesus Only”) Pentecostals. . . . As the differences between modalism and pure trinitarianism are rather minute, it is not surprising that a great number of Christians in mainline denominations, including Roman Catholicism, hold a modalistic conception of the Trinity, at least unconsciously. According to this passage, the Oneness doctrine is a relatively insignificant deviation from “pure trinitarianism” and amounts to nothing more than “a modalistic conception of the Trinity.” Why then it is sufficient to make someone a cultist? Is the author now willing to extend this blanket condemnation to the “great number of Christians in mainline denominations” who hold essentially the same view? Serious Factual Errors The booklet begins with historical background and statistics. Here we find many egregious errors, such as these examples from pages 8 and 9: • Claim: There have been two “recent schisms” in the United Pentecostal Church International (UPCI). First, in 1986 a “3,000-member” church left. Response: The church in question had about one-fifth this number at the time, and there was no schism. • Claim: In 1993 “over 200 pastors” left the UPCI rather than “pledge conformity with the UPCI’s ‘Holiness Standard.’” The booklet repeats a 1993 prediction that “800 ministers would leave the denomination soon” and comments, “It is not yet disclosed how many defected.” Response: In the spring of 1993, the UPCI reported that 50 pastors withdrew by missing the final deadline to sign an annual reaffirmation of two sections of the UPCI’s Articles of Faith entitled “Fundamental Doctrine” and “Holiness.” A total of 120 ministers did not sign the affirmation, representing 1.6 percent of the total of 349

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />

It is evident that the author and publisher wish to portray<br />

Oneness Pentecostals as cultists and false religionists. The booklet<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the newest in a series by various authors entitled<br />

Zondervan Guide to Cults and Religious Movements. On the<br />

cover, the most prominent word in this series title is Cults. The<br />

introductory booklet to the series is Unmasking the Cults. The<br />

last booklet in the series summarizes all the movements studied,<br />

and its title is Truth and Error: Comparative Charts <strong>of</strong> Cults<br />

and <strong>Christian</strong>ity. The other twelve titles in the series are<br />

Jehovah’s Witnesses; Masonic Lodge; Mormonism; New Age<br />

Movement; Satanism; Unification Church; Mind Sciences;<br />

Astrology and Psychic Phenomena; Buddhism, Taoism and<br />

Other Far Eastern Religions; Goddess Worship, Witchcraft<br />

and Neo-Paganism; Hinduism, TM and Hare Krishna; and<br />

Unitarian Universalism.<br />

Classifying Oneness Pentecostals with these groups implies<br />

a spiritual similarity and a common satanic origin. At the least,<br />

it seems that the author and publisher discredit all Oneness<br />

Pentecostal experiences with God. But how can they venture to<br />

make such a judgment with no indication that they have ever<br />

attended Oneness Pentecostal worship services or interacted<br />

significantly with Oneness Pentecostals on a personal level?<br />

How can they seemingly denigrate all faith, repentance,<br />

reception <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit, spiritual gifts, and spiritual fruit<br />

among Oneness Pentecostals while apparently accepting the<br />

same manifestations among Trinitarian Pentecostals? Have they<br />

no concern that they could be ascribing works <strong>of</strong> the Holy Spirit<br />

to Satan, something Jesus warned strongly against in Matthew<br />

12:22-32? In this connection, it is noteworthy that many<br />

Oneness Pentecostals first believed on the Lord, repented, or<br />

received the Holy Spirit in trinitarian churches and then continued<br />

serving the Lord in Oneness churches.<br />

The author’s willingness to excoriate Oneness Pentecostals<br />

for their doctrine <strong>of</strong> God is particularly surprising in light <strong>of</strong><br />

views expressed in his book God in Three Persons: 335<br />

348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!