A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

ntslibrary.com
from ntslibrary.com More from this publisher
13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine saved people from other churches rather than by converting the lost from a lifestyle of sin to holiness. When their megachurches mushroom, there often seems to be little concern for ministerial ethics, qualifications for spiritual leadership, and discipleship of every member. How do the Charismatics relate to Pentecostals? Initially, Trinitarian Pentecostals had great reservations about the Charismatic movement, but today there is widespread acceptance, interaction, fellowship, mutual influence, and mutual transfer of ministers, churches, and members. In 1994, major Trinitarian Pentecostal and Charismatic organizations joined together in the Pentecostal/Charismatic Churches of North America (PCCNA), which replaced the Pentecostal Fellowship of North America (PFNA). While we have discussed various practices and emphases that are typical of Charismatics, we must also note that many classical Pentecostals, especially trinitarians, have adopted many of them. Although Pentecostalism gave rise to the Charismatic movement, the latter is now exerting greater influence on the former. The Charismatics have generally prevailed on matters of holiness and fellowship, and they are significantly affecting forms of worship, views of end-time prophecy, and the initial evidence doctrine. Classical Pentecostal organizations have taken clear stands against the doctrinal innovations of Charismatics, however. For example, the Assemblies of God has adopted official position papers against the Positive Confession doctrine, the Kingdom Now doctrine, the excesses of the Shepherding movement, the belief that Christians can have demons, absolutist views on divine healing, and 316

The Charismatic Movement attempts to teach or imitate speaking in tongues. 315 Oneness Pentecostals generally oppose the distinctive doctrines and practices of Charismatics, although some have followed Charismatic trends. In return, Charismatics usually do not see the Oneness doctrine as a problem, but they object to the doctrine of salvation and holiness lifestyle of Oneness Pentecostals. In 1997, Charisma published the first significant analysis of Oneness Pentecostals by Charismatics. It noted their many achievements but exhibited an agenda of trying to move them toward the Charismatic position. It based its analysis primarily upon views and reports of ex-members rather than interaction with Oneness theologians. The article accused Oneness Pentecostals of “legalism,” “elitism,” being “mean-spirited,” “judgmentalism,” “hypocrisy” and embracing “a flawed theology of salvation by works”—with no awareness of the irony of judging them so harshly based on a few disgruntled sources. 316 From a Oneness Pentecostal perspective, there are many honest-hearted, Spirit-filled people in the Charismatic movement. Indeed, many have received the full Acts 2:38 experience of salvation. The movement has led millions of people to a more biblically based faith and a greater spiritual experience with God. Nevertheless, it has fallen short in restoring them to the full apostolic doctrine and lifestyle. It still needs a revival of the message of the almighty God in Jesus Christ and the message of scriptural holiness, both inwardly and outwardly. In many cases, the movement has actually created significant barriers to further spiritual progress. Multitudes outside the movement have been turned away by foolish, unbiblical doctrines and practices and by the poor examples 317

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />

saved people from other churches rather than by converting<br />

the lost from a lifestyle <strong>of</strong> sin to holiness. When<br />

their megachurches mushroom, there <strong>of</strong>ten seems to be<br />

little concern for ministerial ethics, qualifications for spiritual<br />

leadership, and discipleship <strong>of</strong> every member.<br />

How do the Charismatics relate to Pentecostals?<br />

Initially, Trinitarian Pentecostals had great reservations<br />

about the Charismatic movement, but today there is widespread<br />

acceptance, interaction, fellowship, mutual influence,<br />

and mutual transfer <strong>of</strong> ministers, churches, and<br />

members. In 1994, major Trinitarian Pentecostal and<br />

Charismatic organizations joined together in the<br />

Pentecostal/Charismatic Churches <strong>of</strong> North America<br />

(PCCNA), which replaced the Pentecostal Fellowship <strong>of</strong><br />

North America (PFNA).<br />

While we have discussed various practices and<br />

emphases that are typical <strong>of</strong> Charismatics, we must also<br />

note that many classical Pentecostals, especially trinitarians,<br />

have adopted many <strong>of</strong> them. Although Pentecostalism<br />

gave rise to the Charismatic movement, the latter is<br />

now exerting greater influence on the former. The Charismatics<br />

have generally prevailed on matters <strong>of</strong> holiness<br />

and fellowship, and they are significantly affecting forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> worship, views <strong>of</strong> end-time prophecy, and the initial<br />

evidence doctrine.<br />

Classical Pentecostal organizations have taken clear<br />

stands against the doctrinal innovations <strong>of</strong> Charismatics,<br />

however. For example, the Assemblies <strong>of</strong> God has adopted<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial position papers against the Positive Confession<br />

doctrine, the Kingdom Now doctrine, the excesses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Shepherding movement, the belief that <strong>Christian</strong>s can<br />

have demons, absolutist views on divine healing, and<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!