A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine that arise within evolution. He emphasized faith in the “cosmic Christ,” describing the mystical body of Christ as evolving in the context of human evolution and identifying this process as the true meaning of redemption. He believed that humanity is evolving toward the “omega point” of perfection, of unification under the commitment of love, and he identified this destiny as Jesus Christ. Hans Küng (born 1928) of Switzerland became a professor at Tübingen. In his doctoral thesis, he analyzed Karl Barth’s doctrine of justification by faith and concluded that it was compatible with the teaching of the Council of Trent. He further stated, “Today there is a fundamental agreement between Catholic and Protestant theology, precisely in the theology of justification—the point at which Reformation theology took its departure.” 259 Most Catholic theologians accepted his conclusion and no longer see the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith alone as a heresy. In 1970, Küng attacked the doctrine of papal infallibility. Instead, he proposed a doctrine of the “indefectibility” of the church. That is, God keeps the church in the truth, preserving the gospel, despite errors in the church. Similarly, he argued that the Bible is not infallible but indefectible. Küng acknowledged the pope as the leader of the church, but as the chief servant rather than the sovereign. As a result of these ideas, under the direction of Pope John Paul II, the church stated that Küng was no longer a Catholic theologian. He was not excommunicated or removed from the priesthood, but he was banned from holding a post as professor of Catholic theology. Despite this restriction, he continued to teach at Tübingen and to 236
Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy exert enormous influence. Current Issues in Catholicism Today there is probably as much theological diversity within the Roman Catholic Church as there is within mainstream Protestantism. There are liberal Catholic theologians who question the basic doctrines of Scripture and Catholic tradition and who question historic moral and social stands. There are also conservatives who uphold the inerrancy or at least the infallibility of Scripture and who advocate strict morality. Just as in Protestantism, there are many proponents of modern approaches such as historical criticism, situation ethics, liberation theology, and feminist theology. Under the leadership of Pope John Paul II, the Roman Catholic Church has remained officially conservative on moral issues, standing firm against artificial birth control, abortion, divorce, extramarital sex, and homosexuality. It opposes women in the priesthood, and it insists on celibacy of the priesthood. Catholic laity, however, have abandoned many of these moral stands, particularly in the West. For example, almost all Catholics in the West practice some form of birth control, and the rates of divorce, premarital sex, and abortion are about the same for Catholics as for the general population. Moreover, many bishops in Europe and the U.S. are working toward changes in some of these areas, although they remain in submission to the pope. In particular, there is pressure to rethink the rules regarding the priesthood, due to a severe shortage of priests in the U.S. and Europe. In some cases, parishes have been consolidated, and in others, lay persons have had to take over many functions that were traditionally 237
- Page 185 and 186: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Evalua
- Page 187 and 188: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Since
- Page 189 and 190: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy nous C
- Page 191 and 192: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy God an
- Page 193 and 194: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy 5. Its
- Page 195 and 196: validity is not very intense at thi
- Page 197 and 198: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Patter
- Page 199 and 200: 7 Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism
- Page 201 and 202: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism p
- Page 203 and 204: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism r
- Page 205 and 206: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 207 and 208: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 209 and 210: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism s
- Page 211 and 212: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism t
- Page 213 and 214: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism g
- Page 215 and 216: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 217 and 218: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism C
- Page 219 and 220: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 221 and 222: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 223 and 224: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 225: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism c
- Page 228 and 229: A History of Christian Doctrine Des
- Page 230 and 231: A History of Christian Doctrine exe
- Page 232 and 233: A History of Christian Doctrine pro
- Page 234 and 235: A History of Christian Doctrine sta
- Page 238 and 239: A History of Christian Doctrine res
- Page 240 and 241: A History of Christian Doctrine mat
- Page 242 and 243: A History of Christian Doctrine but
- Page 244 and 245: A History of Christian Doctrine Sav
- Page 246 and 247: A History of Christian Doctrine Nes
- Page 248 and 249: A History of Christian Doctrine ove
- Page 250 and 251: A History of Christian Doctrine Gos
- Page 252 and 253: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 254 and 255: A History of Christian Doctrine pas
- Page 256 and 257: A History of Christian Doctrine par
- Page 258 and 259: A History of Christian Doctrine mem
- Page 260 and 261: A History of Christian Doctrine on
- Page 262 and 263: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 264 and 265: A History of Christian Doctrine All
- Page 266 and 267: A History of Christian Doctrine Rai
- Page 268 and 269: A History of Christian Doctrine Ray
- Page 270 and 271: A History of Christian Doctrine spi
- Page 272 and 273: A History of Christian Doctrine Chr
- Page 274 and 275: A History of Christian Doctrine Spi
- Page 276 and 277: A History of Christian Doctrine lif
- Page 278 and 279: A History of Christian Doctrine Wil
- Page 280 and 281: A History of Christian Doctrine wit
- Page 282 and 283: A History of Christian Doctrine The
- Page 284 and 285: A History of Christian Doctrine the
Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy<br />
exert enormous influence.<br />
Current Issues in Catholicism<br />
Today there is probably as much theological diversity<br />
within the Roman Catholic Church as there is within<br />
mainstream Protestantism. There are liberal Catholic theologians<br />
who question the basic doctrines <strong>of</strong> Scripture<br />
and Catholic tradition and who question historic moral<br />
and social stands. There are also conservatives who<br />
uphold the inerrancy or at least the infallibility <strong>of</strong><br />
Scripture and who advocate strict morality. Just as in<br />
Protestantism, there are many proponents <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
approaches such as historical criticism, situation ethics,<br />
liberation theology, and feminist theology.<br />
Under the leadership <strong>of</strong> Pope John Paul II, the Roman<br />
Catholic Church has remained <strong>of</strong>ficially conservative on<br />
moral issues, standing firm against artificial birth control,<br />
abortion, divorce, extramarital sex, and homosexuality.<br />
It opposes women in the priesthood, and it insists on<br />
celibacy <strong>of</strong> the priesthood. Catholic laity, however, have<br />
abandoned many <strong>of</strong> these moral stands, particularly in<br />
the West. For example, almost all Catholics in the West<br />
practice some form <strong>of</strong> birth control, and the rates <strong>of</strong><br />
divorce, premarital sex, and abortion are about the same<br />
for Catholics as for the general population. Moreover,<br />
many bishops in Europe and the U.S. are working toward<br />
changes in some <strong>of</strong> these areas, although they remain in<br />
submission to the pope.<br />
In particular, there is pressure to rethink the rules<br />
regarding the priesthood, due to a severe shortage <strong>of</strong><br />
priests in the U.S. and Europe. In some cases, parishes<br />
have been consolidated, and in others, lay persons have<br />
had to take over many functions that were traditionally<br />
237