A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine this number said they would reach heaven because of their good works or because everyone goes to heaven. • 48% of church attendees considered themselves born again. • 58% of those holding church leadership positions considered themselves born again. • 15% of those holding church leadership positions said they had never made a personal commitment to Christ. Evangelicals and Oneness Pentecostals Trinitarian Pentecostals consider themselves to be Evangelicals even though the Pentecostals arose primarily from the Holiness movement while the Evangelical movement was a development from Fundamentalism, which rejected the Pentecostal movement. As we discussed in chapter 5, this self-identification has been a significant influence in changing Pentecostals. For better or worse, it appears that the “evangelicalization” of Trinitarian Pentecostals will continue. What about Oneness Pentecostals? Are they Evangelicals? If we examine the distinctive doctrines that Evangelicals proclaim in contrast to Roman Catholicism and Protestant Liberalism, then Oneness Pentecostals would indeed appear to be Evangelicals. Some Evangelical cult-hunting organizations have argued that they are not, however, because of their distinctive doctrines of the Godhead and salvation, and therefore label them as a cult. Ironically, in making this claim, the cult hunters appeal to “historic orthodoxy” and the creeds, sounding more like Catholics than Protestants. J. L. Hall, editor in 224
Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism chief of the UPCI, has examined their criteria in light of Scripture and has shown that on this basis the Oneness Pentecostals are more truly Evangelical than the mainstream Evangelicals. 250 Oneness Pentecostals should resist the efforts of those who label them a cult. (See appendixes C and D.) First, it is a prejudicial label designed to thwart a sincere examination of Scripture. Second, as the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology notes, it plays into the hands of secularists who would curtail religious freedom for everyone. 251 At the same time, Oneness Pentecostals should be cognizant of their unique theological identity. They should resist “evangelicalization” but should affirm that in the light of Scripture they are indeed the most evangelical believers in the truest sense of the word. As the motto of the UPCI proclaims, they believe in proclaiming “the whole gospel to the whole world.” 225
- Page 173 and 174: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy must h
- Page 175 and 176: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Barth
- Page 177 and 178: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and or
- Page 179 and 180: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and po
- Page 181 and 182: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy presen
- Page 183 and 184: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Only h
- Page 185 and 186: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Evalua
- Page 187 and 188: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Since
- Page 189 and 190: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy nous C
- Page 191 and 192: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy God an
- Page 193 and 194: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy 5. Its
- Page 195 and 196: validity is not very intense at thi
- Page 197 and 198: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Patter
- Page 199 and 200: 7 Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism
- Page 201 and 202: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism p
- Page 203 and 204: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism r
- Page 205 and 206: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 207 and 208: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 209 and 210: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism s
- Page 211 and 212: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism t
- Page 213 and 214: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism g
- Page 215 and 216: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 217 and 218: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism C
- Page 219 and 220: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 221 and 222: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 223: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 228 and 229: A History of Christian Doctrine Des
- Page 230 and 231: A History of Christian Doctrine exe
- Page 232 and 233: A History of Christian Doctrine pro
- Page 234 and 235: A History of Christian Doctrine sta
- Page 236 and 237: A History of Christian Doctrine tha
- Page 238 and 239: A History of Christian Doctrine res
- Page 240 and 241: A History of Christian Doctrine mat
- Page 242 and 243: A History of Christian Doctrine but
- Page 244 and 245: A History of Christian Doctrine Sav
- Page 246 and 247: A History of Christian Doctrine Nes
- Page 248 and 249: A History of Christian Doctrine ove
- Page 250 and 251: A History of Christian Doctrine Gos
- Page 252 and 253: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 254 and 255: A History of Christian Doctrine pas
- Page 256 and 257: A History of Christian Doctrine par
- Page 258 and 259: A History of Christian Doctrine mem
- Page 260 and 261: A History of Christian Doctrine on
- Page 262 and 263: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 264 and 265: A History of Christian Doctrine All
- Page 266 and 267: A History of Christian Doctrine Rai
- Page 268 and 269: A History of Christian Doctrine Ray
- Page 270 and 271: A History of Christian Doctrine spi
- Page 272 and 273: A History of Christian Doctrine Chr
A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />
this number said they would reach heaven because<br />
<strong>of</strong> their good works or because everyone goes to<br />
heaven.<br />
• 48% <strong>of</strong> church attendees considered themselves<br />
born again.<br />
• 58% <strong>of</strong> those holding church leadership positions<br />
considered themselves born again.<br />
• 15% <strong>of</strong> those holding church leadership positions<br />
said they had never made a personal commitment<br />
to Christ.<br />
Evangelicals and Oneness Pentecostals<br />
Trinitarian Pentecostals consider themselves to be<br />
Evangelicals even though the Pentecostals arose primarily<br />
from the Holiness movement while the Evangelical<br />
movement was a development from Fundamentalism,<br />
which rejected the Pentecostal movement. As we discussed<br />
in chapter 5, this self-identification has been a significant<br />
influence in changing Pentecostals. For better or<br />
worse, it appears that the “evangelicalization” <strong>of</strong> Trinitarian<br />
Pentecostals will continue.<br />
What about Oneness Pentecostals? Are they<br />
Evangelicals? If we examine the distinctive doctrines that<br />
Evangelicals proclaim in contrast to Roman Catholicism<br />
and Protestant Liberalism, then Oneness Pentecostals<br />
would indeed appear to be Evangelicals. Some Evangelical<br />
cult-hunting organizations have argued that they<br />
are not, however, because <strong>of</strong> their distinctive doctrines <strong>of</strong><br />
the Godhead and salvation, and therefore label them as a<br />
cult. Ironically, in making this claim, the cult hunters<br />
appeal to “historic orthodoxy” and the creeds, sounding<br />
more like Catholics than Protestants. J. L. Hall, editor in<br />
224