A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

ntslibrary.com
from ntslibrary.com More from this publisher
13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine Pentecostal movement and the Fundamentalist movement are quite distinct. Historically, the former began in 1901, while the latter began in 1910, among two entirely different groups of people. The Pentecostals arose primarily from the edges of the Holiness movement, and they developed their own organizations in the first two decades of the century. The Fundamentalists arose primarily among Presbyterians, Baptists, and other large Protestant bodies. They fought for control of their denominations for years and did not form their own organizations until the 1930s. More importantly, as a matter of theology, the early Fundamentalists flatly rejected the Pentecostal movement. They typically said that speaking in tongues is of the devil, or at best a psychologically induced phenomenon. The reaction of the two editors of The Fundamentals is a good example. A. C. Dixon discussed the baptism of the Holy Ghost with William Durham but rejected the doctrine as an indictment against Christianity. He said the Pentecostal movement was “wicked and adulterous.” 233 In his 1895 book The Baptism with the Holy Ghost, R. A. Torrey had promoted the Keswick concept of the baptism of the Holy Ghost as an endowment of power. He had even speculated that tongues could be the initial sign but ultimately rejected this idea: 234 208 In my early study of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit, I noticed that in many instances those who were so baptized “spoke with tongues,” and the question came often into my mind: if one is baptized with the Holy Spirit will he not speak with tongues? But I

Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism saw no one so speaking, and I often wondered, is there anyone today who actually is baptized with the Holy Spirit. This 12 th chapter of 1st Corinthians cleared me up on that, especially when I found Paul asking of those who had been baptized with the Holy Spirit: “Do all speak with tongues?” When the Pentecostal movement came, Torrey rejected it out of hand. He asserted, “God withdrew the gift of tongues from the church back in the beginning of the Church Age, and there is no good reason to say that He ever restored it.” He also said that the Pentecostal movement “was emphatically not of God and founded by a sodomite.” 235 Fundamentalists typically held that miracles ceased with the completion of the New Testament. Warfield argued against tongues on that basis. They also used dispensationalism to maintain that God no longer deals with His people through visible miracles, signs, and wonders. In 1928, the World’s Christian Fundamentalist Association officially rejected speaking in tongues and miraculous healing ministries. When it was formed in 1941, the American Council of Christian Churches specifically excluded Pentecostals and those who had fellowship with Pentecostals. In the 1980s, Jerry Falwell suggested that speaking in tongues results from eating too much pizza the night before and getting indigestion. Thus it is a misnomer to speak of Pentecostals as Fundamentalists. Of course, Pentecostals have historically affirmed the five essential points of Fundamentalism that we have presented—the verbal inspiration and inerrancy of Scripture, the deity and virgin birth of Jesus, 209

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />

Pentecostal movement and the Fundamentalist movement<br />

are quite distinct. Historically, the former began in 1901,<br />

while the latter began in 1910, among two entirely different<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> people. The Pentecostals arose primarily<br />

from the edges <strong>of</strong> the Holiness movement, and they developed<br />

their own organizations in the first two decades <strong>of</strong><br />

the century. The Fundamentalists arose primarily among<br />

Presbyterians, Baptists, and other large Protestant bodies.<br />

They fought for control <strong>of</strong> their denominations for<br />

years and did not form their own organizations until the<br />

1930s.<br />

More importantly, as a matter <strong>of</strong> theology, the early<br />

Fundamentalists flatly rejected the Pentecostal movement.<br />

They typically said that speaking in tongues is <strong>of</strong><br />

the devil, or at best a psychologically induced phenomenon.<br />

The reaction <strong>of</strong> the two editors <strong>of</strong> The Fundamentals<br />

is a good example. A. C. Dixon discussed the baptism <strong>of</strong><br />

the Holy Ghost with William Durham but rejected the<br />

doctrine as an indictment against <strong>Christian</strong>ity. He said the<br />

Pentecostal movement was “wicked and adulterous.” 233<br />

In his 1895 book The Baptism with the Holy Ghost,<br />

R. A. Torrey had promoted the Keswick concept <strong>of</strong> the<br />

baptism <strong>of</strong> the Holy Ghost as an endowment <strong>of</strong> power. He<br />

had even speculated that tongues could be the initial sign<br />

but ultimately rejected this idea: 234<br />

208<br />

In my early study <strong>of</strong> the Baptism with the Holy<br />

Spirit, I noticed that in many instances those who<br />

were so baptized “spoke with tongues,” and the question<br />

came <strong>of</strong>ten into my mind: if one is baptized with<br />

the Holy Spirit will he not speak with tongues? But I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!