A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

ntslibrary.com
from ntslibrary.com More from this publisher
13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine was made to deal seriously with scriptural teaching. (4) Universalism—the view that all will be saved regardless of faith, religion, or moral condition, became standard doctrine. (5) World history was interpreted in Marxist terms, superficially glossed with traditional Christian vocabulary. (6) Left-wing offenses against human rights and human freedom were seldom noted, and rarely rebuked. By contrast, right-wing oppression was made a cause célèbre; and the council actively opposed efforts to further human rights and political democracy in the Marxist countries. In 1984, at its sixth assembly at Vancouver, the WCC attempted to woo Evangelicals. Christianity Today reassessed the council at that time and concluded that its theology still fell far short of biblical truth in five major areas: 213 192 1. Its equivocal stand on the deity of Christ. . . . 2. Its failure to diagnose the predicament of mankind [human sinfulness]. . . . 3. Its wrong diagnosis surely leads to a wrong remedy. . . . In the WCC study volume prepared for the Vancouver assembly, John Paulton lists as one unlikely option, that “only those calling upon Jesus as their personal savior, can be saved.”. . . 4. Its almost exclusive concern for the horizontal dimension of salvation . . . communal salvation, one that leads to a new humanity and a restoration of society rather than to personal faith in Jesus Christ, a right relationship to God, and the new birth. . . .

Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy 5. Its religious pluralism. . . . Its official preassembly study guide [said], “In the end the great communities of faith will not have disappeared. None will have ‘won’ over the other. Jews will still be Jews; Muslims still Muslims; and those of the great Eastern faiths, still Buddhists or Hindus or Taoists. Africa will still witness to its traditional life view; China to its inheritance. People will still come from the east and the west, the north and the south, and sit down in the Kingdom of God without having first become ‘Christians’ like us.”. . . [A] stern warning [was] presented by World Council official D. C. Mulder against evangelizing because it imposed an obstacle to dialogue with other religions. Moreover, the World Council study guide on the Bible stated: 214 There are diverse literary traditions in the biblical writings. . . . Some of these traditions may be contradictory. The church is in dialogue with Scripture, but has been fed from many sources, in the light of which, biblical statements may have to be declared inadequate, or erroneous. . . . We are not to regard the Bible primarily as a standard to which we must conform in all the questions arising in our life. In 1998, the WCC held its eighth assembly in Harare, Zimbabwe. It faced considerable dissent from Orthodox bodies, which make up about 30 percent of the membership and are concerned about the increasingly liberal drift of the organization. Christianity Today reported, “Both Orthodox and 193

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />

was made to deal seriously with scriptural teaching.<br />

(4) Universalism—the view that all will be saved<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> faith, religion, or moral condition,<br />

became standard doctrine. (5) World history was<br />

interpreted in Marxist terms, superficially glossed<br />

with traditional <strong>Christian</strong> vocabulary. (6) Left-wing<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenses against human rights and human freedom<br />

were seldom noted, and rarely rebuked. By contrast,<br />

right-wing oppression was made a cause célèbre;<br />

and the council actively opposed efforts to further<br />

human rights and political democracy in the Marxist<br />

countries.<br />

In 1984, at its sixth assembly at Vancouver, the WCC<br />

attempted to woo Evangelicals. <strong>Christian</strong>ity Today<br />

reassessed the council at that time and concluded that its<br />

theology still fell far short <strong>of</strong> biblical truth in five major<br />

areas: 213<br />

192<br />

1. Its equivocal stand on the deity <strong>of</strong> Christ. . . .<br />

2. Its failure to diagnose the predicament <strong>of</strong><br />

mankind [human sinfulness]. . . .<br />

3. Its wrong diagnosis surely leads to a wrong<br />

remedy. . . . In the WCC study volume prepared for<br />

the Vancouver assembly, John Paulton lists as one<br />

unlikely option, that “only those calling upon Jesus<br />

as their personal savior, can be saved.”. . .<br />

4. Its almost exclusive concern for the horizontal<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> salvation . . . communal salvation,<br />

one that leads to a new humanity and a restoration <strong>of</strong><br />

society rather than to personal faith in Jesus Christ, a<br />

right relationship to God, and the new birth. . . .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!