A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine supernatural message of the Bible. They emphasized a personal encounter with God, but they failed to discover the biblical experience of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Other Philosophical and Theological Developments A man who had a tremendous impact upon twentiethcentury religious views was Sigmund Freud (1856- 1939), an Austrian Jew. He founded the modern study of psychology and the practice of psychotherapy. Many of Freud’s ideas are quite controversial even today, notably his tracing of most psychological problems to childhood experiences and his attribution of almost every motivation to sexuality (often unconscious or repressed). Freud was an atheist, and he labeled religion as a neurosis. In his view, only an unhealthy mind would believe in God or depend upon religion for assistance. Christian thought was a significant force in the Civil Rights movement in the United States in the 1960s, which secured political and social rights for blacks. The moral leader of this movement was Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-68), a Baptist minister who was committed to nonviolent protest in order to achieve equality and integration. He worked through the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to achieve his goals. King organized the massive March on Washington in 1963 and was assassinated in 1968. A philosophical development that affected modern theology is positivism. This philosophy stresses the analysis of language, and it tries to determine which logical propositions have factual meaning. It says that all valid knowledge comes through the scientific method. 186
Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Since metaphysical language cannot be verified by the scientific method, it is meaningless. In the 1960s, some theologians drew from the ideas of positivism and the implications of Bultmann, Tillich, and others to formulate secular theology. They sought to apply theology to the secular world and to answer the questions of secular philosophy. Carried to its extreme, this movement said that language about God is meaningless. It is impossible to talk intelligently about God, and it is even impossible to think of God as a personal being. This movement became characterized by the phrase “God is dead.” What was left was to apply theology to society— a reduction of theology to philosophy. In this line of thought, Joseph Fletcher became the foremost exponent of situation ethics. Under this view, there are no moral absolutes. What is true and right depends upon the situation. What is moral in one situation may not be moral in another. Fletcher went so far as to say that, in certain cases, such things as prostitution or fornication may not be wrong. To make a moral decision on these matters, we have to look at the background of people, the influences on them, their motivation, their purpose, and the alternatives available to them. Liberation theology arose in Latin America among Roman Catholics who were influenced by Marxism. It looks at salvation largely in terms of political and economic liberation, sounding much like the social gospel in a revolutionary setting. According to liberation theologians, the church’s goal should be to create a just society, and therefore it should be active in promoting political, economic, and social changes. They typically define social justice to include the redistribution of wealth and 187
- Page 136 and 137: A History of Christian Doctrine wat
- Page 138 and 139: A History of Christian Doctrine lat
- Page 140 and 141: A History of Christian Doctrine gro
- Page 142 and 143: A History of Christian Doctrine Hol
- Page 144 and 145: A History of Christian Doctrine two
- Page 146 and 147: A History of Christian Doctrine fre
- Page 148 and 149: A History of Christian Doctrine goi
- Page 150 and 151: A History of Christian Doctrine bat
- Page 152 and 153: A History of Christian Doctrine All
- Page 154 and 155: A History of Christian Doctrine A f
- Page 156 and 157: A History of Christian Doctrine tod
- Page 158 and 159: A History of Christian Doctrine The
- Page 160 and 161: A History of Christian Doctrine add
- Page 162 and 163: A History of Christian Doctrine vie
- Page 165 and 166: 6 Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy In c
- Page 167 and 168: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy relati
- Page 169 and 170: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy orphan
- Page 171 and 172: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Word o
- Page 173 and 174: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy must h
- Page 175 and 176: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Barth
- Page 177 and 178: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and or
- Page 179 and 180: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and po
- Page 181 and 182: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy presen
- Page 183 and 184: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Only h
- Page 185: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Evalua
- Page 189 and 190: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy nous C
- Page 191 and 192: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy God an
- Page 193 and 194: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy 5. Its
- Page 195 and 196: validity is not very intense at thi
- Page 197 and 198: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Patter
- Page 199 and 200: 7 Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism
- Page 201 and 202: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism p
- Page 203 and 204: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism r
- Page 205 and 206: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 207 and 208: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 209 and 210: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism s
- Page 211 and 212: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism t
- Page 213 and 214: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism g
- Page 215 and 216: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 217 and 218: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism C
- Page 219 and 220: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 221 and 222: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism T
- Page 223 and 224: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 225: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism c
- Page 228 and 229: A History of Christian Doctrine Des
- Page 230 and 231: A History of Christian Doctrine exe
- Page 232 and 233: A History of Christian Doctrine pro
- Page 234 and 235: A History of Christian Doctrine sta
Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy<br />
Since metaphysical language cannot be verified by the<br />
scientific method, it is meaningless.<br />
In the 1960s, some theologians drew from the ideas<br />
<strong>of</strong> positivism and the implications <strong>of</strong> Bultmann, Tillich,<br />
and others to formulate secular theology. They sought to<br />
apply theology to the secular world and to answer the<br />
questions <strong>of</strong> secular philosophy. Carried to its extreme,<br />
this movement said that language about God is meaningless.<br />
It is impossible to talk intelligently about God, and it<br />
is even impossible to think <strong>of</strong> God as a personal being.<br />
This movement became characterized by the phrase “God<br />
is dead.” What was left was to apply theology to society—<br />
a reduction <strong>of</strong> theology to philosophy.<br />
In this line <strong>of</strong> thought, Joseph Fletcher became the<br />
foremost exponent <strong>of</strong> situation ethics. Under this view,<br />
there are no moral absolutes. What is true and right<br />
depends upon the situation. What is moral in one situation<br />
may not be moral in another. Fletcher went so far as<br />
to say that, in certain cases, such things as prostitution or<br />
fornication may not be wrong. To make a moral decision<br />
on these matters, we have to look at the background <strong>of</strong><br />
people, the influences on them, their motivation, their<br />
purpose, and the alternatives available to them.<br />
Liberation theology arose in Latin America among<br />
Roman Catholics who were influenced by Marxism. It<br />
looks at salvation largely in terms <strong>of</strong> political and economic<br />
liberation, sounding much like the social gospel in<br />
a revolutionary setting. According to liberation theologians,<br />
the church’s goal should be to create a just society,<br />
and therefore it should be active in promoting political,<br />
economic, and social changes. They typically define<br />
social justice to include the redistribution <strong>of</strong> wealth and<br />
187