13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong> <strong>Doctrine</strong><br />

publication was Church Dogmatics (1932-64). It was the<br />

most comprehensive theological work <strong>of</strong> the century, with<br />

twenty-one volumes in English.<br />

Barth emphasized the “otherness” <strong>of</strong> God and the<br />

“strange new world” <strong>of</strong> the Bible. In other words, God is<br />

so different from us that we could never learn about Him<br />

simply by human reason. Rationalism is insufficient to<br />

establish religion. Rather, we must learn about God by<br />

revelation, and God’s Word is His revelation to us. Thus,<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity is revelation, not reason.<br />

Clearly, Barth rejected the central tenet <strong>of</strong><br />

Liberalism—the idea that we can approach God and construct<br />

religion through rationalism. He fell short <strong>of</strong> going<br />

back completely to earlier Protestant orthodoxy, however,<br />

because he did not fully uphold the infallibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bible and he employed the methods <strong>of</strong> higher criticism,<br />

with its denial <strong>of</strong> the Bible’s literal accuracy.<br />

He avoided the apparent conflict between his emphasis<br />

on biblical revelation and his failure to uphold biblical<br />

infallibility by stressing that God uses the Bible to speak<br />

to us individually when we encounter Him personally.<br />

Instead <strong>of</strong> viewing the Bible as the absolute Word <strong>of</strong> God,<br />

he said it “becomes” the Word <strong>of</strong> God when humans<br />

encounter God. The objective statements <strong>of</strong> Scripture,<br />

then, are not as important as what the Bible means to us<br />

subjectively. Here he built upon the existential philosophy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kierkegaard even while rejecting Liberalism itself.<br />

Barth proclaimed the sovereignty <strong>of</strong> God. God is in<br />

control <strong>of</strong> the world. We cannot remake God in our<br />

image, for God is who He is.<br />

In contrast to Liberalism, Barth emphasized the sinfulness<br />

<strong>of</strong> humanity. Because <strong>of</strong> their sinfulness, humans<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!