A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library
A History of Christian Doctrine professor and son of a Lutheran bishop. By the early twentieth century, Liberalism was in the process of taking over seminaries, universities, and mainline denominations. In general, Liberalism denied that humans have a sinful nature, instead holding that they are basically good. Therefore, it denied the need for salvation in the traditional Christian sense of atonement, redemption, justification, and regeneration. Instead of proclaiming personal deliverance from the penalty of sin, it reinterpreted salvation in terms of improving individuals and bettering society. Heaven and hell became states of being or states of mind rather than literal places. To understand Liberalism, let us briefly examine three prominent theologians at the beginning of the twentieth century. Adolf von Harnack (1851-1930) of Germany was the foremost church historian in his day and a theological professor in Berlin. In 1901 he published an influential book, What Is Christianity? He proposed that one could express the essence of Christianity by three essential points: the fatherhood of God, the brotherhood of man, and the infinite value of the human soul. He discarded the other elements, particularly the miraculous. In effect, he reduced Christianity to a philosophical religion, something that could appeal to everyone and not be offensive to anyone. In the U.S., Walter Rauschenbusch (1861-1918), a German Baptist pastor, was the most prominent proponent of the social gospel, which stressed the importance of social action. Of course, conservative Christian groups, including the Methodists and Holiness people, had long engaged in practical works such as establishing 168
Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy orphanages, feeding the poor, rehabilitating alcoholics, and so on. The primary motivation for the antislavery and temperance movements of the nineteenth century was religious conviction. The social gospel went beyond these kinds of actions, however, and offered a redefinition of Christianity. It said that the goal of Christianity is not the spiritual salvation of individual souls from sin and hell, but the transformation of society on earth. Christians are not to look for the physical return of Christ to earth, the literal reign of Christ for a thousand years, or eternal life in a place called heaven. Rather, the gospel calls them to establish the kingdom of God in this world—the kingdom of justice—through social and political means. The church’s priority should be to work for justice, freedom, and a better society. Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965), a German theologian and philosopher, became famous as a missionary doctor in Africa. He published The Quest of the Historical Jesus (1906). In it, he tried to strip away the myths about Jesus and discover who He really was as a man. He concluded that Jesus mistakenly believed the end of the world was near in His day, and thus He proclaimed that the kingdom of God was at hand. In order to fulfill His predictions, Jesus unsuccessfully tried to provoke the end of the world. He believed He would precipitate the end of all things, and His death would be the climactic moment. In Schweitzer’s view, Jesus miscalculated and was killed too soon to implement His plans. In essence, He failed in His mission. Early Christianity was thus an attempt to reinterpret the failure of Jesus and turn it into a spiritual success. 169
- Page 117 and 118: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations j
- Page 119 and 120: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations b
- Page 121 and 122: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations i
- Page 123: Oneness Pentecostal Organizations b
- Page 126 and 127: A History of Christian Doctrine ton
- Page 128 and 129: A History of Christian Doctrine den
- Page 130 and 131: A History of Christian Doctrine tri
- Page 132 and 133: A History of Christian Doctrine 5,3
- Page 134 and 135: A History of Christian Doctrine in
- Page 136 and 137: A History of Christian Doctrine wat
- Page 138 and 139: A History of Christian Doctrine lat
- Page 140 and 141: A History of Christian Doctrine gro
- Page 142 and 143: A History of Christian Doctrine Hol
- Page 144 and 145: A History of Christian Doctrine two
- Page 146 and 147: A History of Christian Doctrine fre
- Page 148 and 149: A History of Christian Doctrine goi
- Page 150 and 151: A History of Christian Doctrine bat
- Page 152 and 153: A History of Christian Doctrine All
- Page 154 and 155: A History of Christian Doctrine A f
- Page 156 and 157: A History of Christian Doctrine tod
- Page 158 and 159: A History of Christian Doctrine The
- Page 160 and 161: A History of Christian Doctrine add
- Page 162 and 163: A History of Christian Doctrine vie
- Page 165 and 166: 6 Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy In c
- Page 167: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy relati
- Page 171 and 172: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Word o
- Page 173 and 174: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy must h
- Page 175 and 176: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Barth
- Page 177 and 178: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and or
- Page 179 and 180: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy and po
- Page 181 and 182: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy presen
- Page 183 and 184: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Only h
- Page 185 and 186: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Evalua
- Page 187 and 188: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Since
- Page 189 and 190: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy nous C
- Page 191 and 192: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy God an
- Page 193 and 194: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy 5. Its
- Page 195 and 196: validity is not very intense at thi
- Page 197 and 198: Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy Patter
- Page 199 and 200: 7 Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism
- Page 201 and 202: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism p
- Page 203 and 204: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism r
- Page 205 and 206: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 207 and 208: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism A
- Page 209 and 210: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism s
- Page 211 and 212: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism t
- Page 213 and 214: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism g
- Page 215 and 216: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism m
- Page 217 and 218: Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism C
Liberalism and Neo-Orthodoxy<br />
orphanages, feeding the poor, rehabilitating alcoholics,<br />
and so on. The primary motivation for the antislavery and<br />
temperance movements <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century was<br />
religious conviction.<br />
The social gospel went beyond these kinds <strong>of</strong> actions,<br />
however, and <strong>of</strong>fered a redefinition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity. It said<br />
that the goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity is not the spiritual salvation<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual souls from sin and hell, but the transformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> society on earth. <strong>Christian</strong>s are not to look for the<br />
physical return <strong>of</strong> Christ to earth, the literal reign <strong>of</strong><br />
Christ for a thousand years, or eternal life in a place<br />
called heaven. Rather, the gospel calls them to establish<br />
the kingdom <strong>of</strong> God in this world—the kingdom <strong>of</strong> justice—through<br />
social and political means. The church’s<br />
priority should be to work for justice, freedom, and a better<br />
society.<br />
Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965), a German theologian<br />
and philosopher, became famous as a missionary<br />
doctor in Africa. He published The Quest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Historical Jesus (1906). In it, he tried to strip away the<br />
myths about Jesus and discover who He really was as a<br />
man. He concluded that Jesus mistakenly believed the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the world was near in His day, and thus He proclaimed<br />
that the kingdom <strong>of</strong> God was at hand. In order to<br />
fulfill His predictions, Jesus unsuccessfully tried to provoke<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the world. He believed He would precipitate<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> all things, and His death would be the<br />
climactic moment. In Schweitzer’s view, Jesus miscalculated<br />
and was killed too soon to implement His plans. In<br />
essence, He failed in His mission. Early <strong>Christian</strong>ity was<br />
thus an attempt to reinterpret the failure <strong>of</strong> Jesus and<br />
turn it into a spiritual success.<br />
169