A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library A History of Christian Doctrine #3 - Online Christian Library

ntslibrary.com
from ntslibrary.com More from this publisher
13.02.2013 Views

A History of Christian Doctrine bathing, use of tobacco and alcoholic beverages.” In 1963, the Ohio District reaffirmed, with only one dissenting vote, its standard of holiness as stated in its constitution and bylaws: “We oppose all appearance of evil . . . such as immodesty in dress, bobbing or undue dressing of the hair; . . . attendance at picture shows, dances, roller rinks, places where mixed bathing is permitted, use of tobacco, and the use of cosmetics which change the natural appearance.” Also in 1963, the Southern Missouri District (home of Springfield, the headquarters) added a statement against makeup in its list of qualifications for church membership: “Applicant must disapprove of, and refrain from participation in worldly amusements, theaters, movies, cards, dancing and use of make-up, etc.” 176 Oneness Pentecostals have remained the most conservative on issues of practical holiness, although there is some variation in beliefs and in the local implementation of standards. In its Articles of Faith, the UPCI opposes “theaters [movies], dances, mixed bathing or swimming, women cutting their hair, make-up, any apparel that immodestly exposes the body, all worldly sports and amusements, and unwholesome radio programs and music” and ownership of television. A position paper on holiness further explains the meaning of modest apparel: people are not to wear ornamental jewelry or clothing associated with the opposite sex. Other position papers take a stand against abortion, gambling, homosexuality, transcendental meditation, and ungodly, worldly use of computers, the Internet, video equipment, and other technology. 177 Most of the other major Oneness groups have had similar teachings. For instance, in 1963 the PAW opposed 150

Trinitarian Pentecostal Organizations “all unnecessary jewelry, such as rings (not including wedding rings), bracelets, earrings, stick-pins, and flashy breast pins . . . showy colors in dress, attractive hosiery, short dresses, low necks, short sleeves (that is, above the elbow), and bright ties.” 178 In recent years, however, there has been greater variation among many of these groups. The PAW, for example, has many members who wear jewelry and makeup and many others who do not. To some extent, this trend has extended to doctrine, with a few PAW ministers espousing unconditional eternal security and even elements of trinitarianism. Many early Pentecostals, especially those who came from the Holiness movement, opposed all remarriage after divorce. The wife of J. H. King, IPHC leader from 1900 to 1946, left him shortly after their marriage in 1890. Because of his conviction against divorce and remarriage, he remained celibate until she died, remarrying only in 1920. While the AG allows divorce and remarriage in the case of marital unfaithfulness, it will not license anyone who has divorced and remarried and has a previous companion still living. The UPCI allows remarriage for the “innocent party” and will grant ministerial license in such a case, although it recommends that ministers do not remarry after divorce. Most of the early Pentecostals were pacifists. For example, the AG, PAW, and UPCI adopted official statements supporting the government but opposing the taking of human life in warfare. 179 The AG eventually abandoned this position, however. The UPCI retains this view in its Articles of Faith but treats the matter as a “conscientious scruple,” and today many ministers and members are not pacifists. 151

Trinitarian Pentecostal Organizations<br />

“all unnecessary jewelry, such as rings (not including<br />

wedding rings), bracelets, earrings, stick-pins, and flashy<br />

breast pins . . . showy colors in dress, attractive hosiery,<br />

short dresses, low necks, short sleeves (that is, above the<br />

elbow), and bright ties.” 178 In recent years, however, there<br />

has been greater variation among many <strong>of</strong> these groups.<br />

The PAW, for example, has many members who wear jewelry<br />

and makeup and many others who do not. To some<br />

extent, this trend has extended to doctrine, with a few<br />

PAW ministers espousing unconditional eternal security<br />

and even elements <strong>of</strong> trinitarianism.<br />

Many early Pentecostals, especially those who came<br />

from the Holiness movement, opposed all remarriage<br />

after divorce. The wife <strong>of</strong> J. H. King, IPHC leader from<br />

1900 to 1946, left him shortly after their marriage in<br />

1890. Because <strong>of</strong> his conviction against divorce and<br />

remarriage, he remained celibate until she died, remarrying<br />

only in 1920. While the AG allows divorce and remarriage<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> marital unfaithfulness, it will not<br />

license anyone who has divorced and remarried and has<br />

a previous companion still living. The UPCI allows remarriage<br />

for the “innocent party” and will grant ministerial<br />

license in such a case, although it recommends that ministers<br />

do not remarry after divorce.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the early Pentecostals were pacifists. For<br />

example, the AG, PAW, and UPCI adopted <strong>of</strong>ficial statements<br />

supporting the government but opposing the taking<br />

<strong>of</strong> human life in warfare. 179 The AG eventually<br />

abandoned this position, however. The UPCI retains this<br />

view in its Articles <strong>of</strong> Faith but treats the matter as a “conscientious<br />

scruple,” and today many ministers and members<br />

are not pacifists.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!