Children's Services Strategic Plan 2010 - 2015 - City of Cockburn

Children’s Services 

Strategic Plan 

2010 - 2015 

July 2010

CITY OF COCKBURN 

CHILDREN’S SERVICES PLAN 2010‐2015 

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

CONTENTS 

PART 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 3 

1.1 Child‐Friendly Outdoor Spaces and Buildings ...................................................... 5 

1.2 Social Participation.............................................................................................. 5 

1.3 Respect and Inclusion.......................................................................................... 5 

1.4 Communication and Information ........................................................................ 5 

1.5 Community and Health Services.......................................................................... 5 

1.6 Responding to the needs of Children and Families .............................................. 5 

PART 2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 6 

PART 3 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................... 7 

PART 4 SITUATION ANALYSIS............................................................................................ 9 

4.1 CURRENT DEMOGRAPHIC PICTURE............................................................................ 9 

Table 1: City of Cockburn population data ................................................................... 9 

Diagram 2: Migration flows, City of Cockburn, 2001 to 2006 ..................................... 13 

4.2 CURRENT CITY OF COCKBURN SERVICES & FACILITIES AND ASSESSMENT OF 

PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................................. 14 

4.3 POLICY TRENDS ....................................................................................................... 20 

4.4 THE CHILDCARE SERVICES INDUSTRY TRENDS ......................................................... 30 

PART 5 CONSULTATIONS................................................................................................. 32 

PART 6 GAP AND NEEDS ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 33 

6.1 Provision of early intervention health services to children, sufficient to address need 

..................................................................................................................................... 34 

6.2 Gaps in services for children 7 – 9 years (after‐school, vacation & club activities) .. 35 

6.3 Parenting and other early childhood services ......................................................... 40 

6.4 The impact of changing policies and emerging trends ............................................. 52 

6.5 Summary of Gap and Needs Analysis ...................................................................... 59 

PART 7 OUTCOMES AND STRATEGIES ............................................................................. 60 

7.1 Child‐Friendly Outdoor Spaces and Buildings (Infrastructure).................................. 60 

7.2 Social Participation (Lifestyle and Aspirations ) ...................................................... 61 

7.3 Respect and Inclusion (Lifestyle and Aspirations) ................................................... 61 

July 2010 PAGE 1



__________________________________________________________________________________ 

7.4 Communication and Information (Lifestyle and Aspirations ; Governance ) ............ 62 

7.5 Access to Community and Health Services (Lifestyle and Aspirations; Transport)... 63 

7.6 Responding to the emerging needs of Children and Families (Lifestyle and 

Aspirations; Demographics) .......................................................................................... 65 

ATTACHMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 

Attachment 1 Consultancy brief……………………………………………………………………...………………… 

Attachment 2 City of Cockburn population projections 0‐4 years of age……………………………. 

Attachment 3 City of Cockburn population projections 5‐12 years of age……………………..…… 

Attachment 4 List of children’s services in the City of Cockburn………………………………………... 

Attachment 5 Documents reviewed as part of the project…………………………………….............. 

Attachment 6 Consultation brochure……………………..…………………………………………………………. 

Attachment 7 Interview questionnaire…………………………………………………..…………………………. 

Attachment 8 List of people who contributed to the plan……………………… ………………………... 

Attachment 9 Achievements from ‘Future Directions for Children Services 2001‐2010’…..… 

Attachment 10 Consultation with children aged 6 – 12 years…………………………….………………... 

The Consultancy team of Dr Helen Grzyb, Margaret Owens, Gordon Grzyb and Rob Paul 

would like to thank the project manager, Barbara Freeman, for her thoughts and advice 

during the course of the project, as well as the project steering committee of Joan De 

Castro, Jill Zumach and Gail Bowman. 

The project team would also like to express its appreciation to the many stakeholders who 

contributed their time and thoughts to the project. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

The City of Cockburn’s previous ten year plan, ‘Future Directions for Children’s Services Plan 

2001 to 2010’, identified a wide range of strategies to expand and improve Children’s 

Services for parents and families across the City. 

Subsequent achievements in Children’s Services over the last ten years have been 

impressive and have increased the diversity of programs and services offered to families and 

children in the City of Cockburn. 

With the completion of the ten year plan, the City undertook the development of a new five 

year plan. This plan is to inform new directions and strategies needed to meet the 

challenges of a complex and changing policy and regulatory environment at federal (i.e. 

Council of Australian Governments) and state government levels, and emerging 

demographic challenges for Children’s Services. 

These demographic challenges include the significant development in the south eastern 

corridor and movement and changes to other areas of the City, and that Census population 

projections for 2016 place the City of Cockburn in the highest strata for 0‐4 year olds – 5000 

to 7461 children. 

This plan is the result of research of current literature (including web sources), policy 

documentation; and consultation with parents, children, staff and service providers about 

current and future services and needs. 

The project heard from 51 families and from 28 children. There were 4 group meetings 

where there was an opportunity for the City’s staff and its Reference group members to 

provide their thoughts. There were 22 state government officers, agency staff and service 

providers who contributed their views, as well as 24 City of Cockburn staff. 

The City is seen as a substantial provider of children’s services, and families view the City 

positively as standing out from other local government bodies in the provision of highly 

valued services. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Families also note the increased demand on services, which can lead to reduced services for 

individual children. State government officers and service providers see the City as an 

innovator and ready to develop new programs to meet emerging needs. 

Analysis of the research indicated, and stakeholders wished the City to consider, a broad 

range of Key Gaps and Needs in developing plans for action over the next five years: 

1. Provision of early intervention health services for children, sufficient to address 

need 

2. Gaps in services for children 7‐9 years (after school, vacation and club activities) 

3. Parenting and other early childhood services 

4. The impact of changing policies and emerging trends. 

In response to these matters, a strategic framework for recommended strategies for the 

next five years has been developed, comprising 6 Outcomes and 41 Strategies. 

State government and the City’s officers see that there is significant work to do to prepare 

existing programs to meet the new regulatory and funding priority changes soon to be 

introduced for federal and state programs. 

Over the last ten years the City has evolved into a significant provider of children’s services 

(employing around 37 full and part time staff), supporting local children to achieve their 

potential. However there needs to be a balance between: 

• Continuing the philosophy, and in fact, successful delivery of innovation and 

creativity with partners in meeting the emerging needs of the increasingly diverse 

Cockburn population; and 

• the continued quality delivery of essential mature services which meet the 

increasing regulatory requirements at federal and state level. 

These two aspects have influenced a number of the strategies developed in this plan. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

To ensure a child and family friendly City, the following outcomes should be achieved: 

1. Child‐Friendly Outdoor Spaces and Buildings 

Outcome: That children in the City of Cockburn have access to best practice child and 

family‐friendly planned environments that support healthy child development, quality of 

life and inclusion for all. 

2. Social Participation 

Outcome: That children aged 0‐12 years in the City of Cockburn have affordable and 

equitable access to activities and events that support social participation and foster well‐ 

being and social integration. 

3. Respect and Inclusion 

Outcome: That children in the City of Cockburn are recognised, included and encouraged 

to participate as valuable members in the social, civic and economic life of the city. 

4. Communication and Information 

Outcome: That relevant information is readily accessible to children and families 

regarding current services, activities, and events. City of Cockburn staff and Children’s 

service providers keep informed of changing policies and trends regarding children and 

families, both nationally and locally. 

5. Community and Health Services 

Outcome: That children and their parents/ caregivers in the City of Cockburn are able to 

access affordable, inclusive, and quality community support and health services. Access 

includes cost, transport, availability of services, and physical/social access issues. 

6. Responding to the needs of Children and Families 

Outcome: The City facilitates and/or develops programs and services in response to the 

identified needs of children and parents/caregivers, with due consideration for the 

changing demographics and population growth across the City. 

Full details of the 41 strategies are contained in PART 7 of the Plan. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 2 BACKGROUND 

The City of Cockburn developed a 10 year plan for its Children’s Services – ‘Our Children, 

Our Future’, in 2001. 

With the completion of that plan, the City developed a consultancy brief (see Attachment 1) 

and as a result of a request for quotation process, requested Helen Grzyb and Associates to 

review the achievements in the last ten years, and to develop a new plan for the 

forthcoming 5 years for children aged between 0 and 12 years of age residing in the City. 

The project to undertake this work commenced in late November 2009 and has included 

relevant demographic analysis and research, consultation across a broad range of relevant 

stakeholders, and workshops with Human Services staff. 

This five year plan is particularly relevant at the current time with the progress of the 

Council of Australian Government’s (COAG) Early Years Learning Framework 

(Commonwealth of Australia, 2009) and resulting impacts on policies and services for 

children across Western Australia. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 3 METHODOLOGY 

The consultancy brief (Attachment 1) specified three strategies to be completed during the 

course of the project: 

Strategy 1: Update and review information on currently available community services for 

children aged 0 – 12 yrs and their parents/caregivers in the Cockburn District. 

Strategy 2: Conduct consultation/s with both the broader community and service providers, 

and provide demographic analysis, to identify current and future needs for children and 

parents/caregivers in the Cockburn District. 

Strategy 3: Develop recommendations and a Forward Plan outlining the required type and 

location of future services for children and parents/caregivers over the next 5 year period. 

Strategy 1 

The research stage of the project established project governance between the project team 

and the City’s working group. 

Additionally, this stage involved the consideration of a range of written material (policies, 

reviews, other documents) and feedback from the City of Cockburn staff. 

This stage culminated in reports to the working group regarding currently known services in 

the region, an update of achievements on the previous ten year plan, and a stakeholder list 

as preparation for the consultation processes to be undertaken in Strategy 2. 

Research undertaken included federal and state government policy documents, expert 

views from state, national and international sources, as well as verbal updates from 

stakeholders on the most recent policy changes in Western Australia. 

Population demographic analysis was undertaken from sources from the City of Cockburn 

and state government databases. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Strategy 2 

The consultation stage of the project was developed in accord with the OECD guidelines on 

citizen consultation, and the participation guidelines from the WA Commissioner for 

Children and Young People. 

Consultation involved web based, paper based, email, phone, and face to face opportunities 

for stakeholders (including parents and children, service providers, funding bodies, program 

partners, and relevant state and federal organisations) to provide their views. 

Strategy 3 

This stage considered all the material gathered during the course of the project and involved 

the drafting and finalisation of the five year plan. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 4 SITUATION ANALYSIS 

4.1 CURRENT DEMOGRAPHIC PICTURE 

The demographic data used for analysis was drawn from the current City of Cockburn 

website (sourced from ABS data 2006 Census), the Child and Adolescent Community Health 

Unit (2008), and the Department for Communities (2009). See Attachment 1 and 2 for more 

information regarding current population data. 

Population for City of Cockburn 2006 Census Number Percentage of Population 

Children Aged 0 to 4 years 5412 7.3 % 

Children Aged 5 to 11 years 7,721 10.4 % 

Children Aged 12 to 17 years 6,611 8.9 % 

Total children’s population under 18 19,744 26.5% 

Total of all population 74,473 100% 

Numbers of children and families 

0‐4 years: The most significant concentrations of pre‐schoolers were in the small areas of 

Atwell, Beeliar and Success. These are areas that have experienced recent residential 

development, providing housing opportunities for younger families. By contrast, the areas 

with the smallest share of this age group tend to be those that have a more mature age 

structure or that attract mature families, such as Leeming (a portion in the City of 

Cockburn), Munster and Spearwood. 

As can be seen in the graph in Attachment 2, population projections for 2016 place the City 

of Cockburn in the highest strata for 0‐4 year olds – 5000 to 7461 children. 

By 2021, most areas are expected to experience an increase in the number of pre‐schoolers 

with the small areas of Hammond Park‐Wattleup‐Henderson, Aubin Grove‐Banjup and 

Success gaining the most in this age group. These are areas with future greenfield 

development opportunities expected to prove attractive to young families as they develop. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

By contrast, Atwell, as a recently developed suburb, with little future development 

opportunity, is expected to experience a modest decrease in pre‐schoolers as the area ages 

over the forecast period. 

5‐11 years: The most significant concentrations of primary‐school aged were in the small 

areas of Atwell, Aubin‐Grove‐Banjup and Beeliar, while the older suburbs of Hamilton Hill, 

Spearwood and Coolbellup are areas that featured lower shares of persons in this age 

group. The reasons for this different distribution reflect the era of development of the 

different areas. 

As can be seen in Attachment 3, by 2021, substantial increases are expected in Aubin‐Grove‐ 

Banjup, Success and Hammond Park‐Wattleup‐Henderson, and to a lesser extent, Coogee‐ 

North Coogee and Beeliar. This growth reflects where future development is likely to take 

place, providing residential opportunities for families. 

By contrast, a large number of older or developed suburbs are expected to remain relatively 

stable, with a decreasing share of primary‐school aged children as the population ages, or 

because they have traditionally attracted older households. These areas include Leeming, 

Coolbellup, Jandakot and Bibra Lake. 

Couple families with children: The most significant concentrations of couples with children 

were in Leeming, Atwell, Aubin Grove‐Banjup and Jandakot. By contrast, Coolbellup and 

Hamilton Hill had significantly lower shares of couples with children. Significant increases in 

the number of couples with children between 2006 and 2021 are expected in Aubin Grove‐ 

Banjup, Success, Hammond Park‐Wattleup‐Henderson and Coogee‐North Coogee. Leeming 

is expected to have the greatest loss of this household type, followed by Jandakot and Bibra 

Lake. 

Other family compositions: The City’s Support Services Team reported in its Strategic 

Directions 2008‐2011 that there is an increase of young families, single parent families and 

individuals living alone or with other singles. Other increases are people from culturally & 

linguistically diverse backgrounds, and families where one adult works away from home (fly 

in/fly out workers). 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Population Forecast 

Most areas in the City of Cockburn are expected to increase in population to 2021, with the 

largest gains expected in the areas of Aubin Grove‐Banjup, Hammond Park‐Wattleup‐ 

Henderson, Success and Coogee‐North Coogee. By contrast, Jandakot and Leeming, North 

Lake, Coolbellup and Bibra Lake are expected to remain relatively stable throughout the 

period, with only small gains or losses in population. 

The population increases are based on household growth, which in turn relates to new 

residential opportunities. The forecast population growth rates are somewhat higher than 

household growth as a result of an increase in the average number of people per household. 

This is a pattern that is likely to affect the growth areas of the City of Cockburn during this 

period. 

Increased housing opportunities 

The primary housing market role of the City has been to provide affordable home owning 

opportunities for families and prospective families from southern Perth. This traditional role 

is likely to continue in the short term with the continued development of the growth areas 

of Success, Aubin Grove and Hammond Park, as well as the re‐zoning of market gardens in 

areas such as Munster and Spearwood for residential development. 

More recently, development aimed at specific markets has been occurring along the coast, 

in particular attracting second and third homebuyers and 'empty nesters' and retirees, with 

the commencement of the development of Port Coogee. 

In the longer term, these patterns are expected to change. 

The availability of large tracts of 'greenfield' land and other suitable sites for traditional 

family housing is decreasing within the City and are likely to be substantially exhausted 

before 2031, whilst significant sites are being made available in the neighbouring area of the 

Town of Kwinana, which is likely in future to meet an increasing proportion of the regional 

demand for this type of housing. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Despite this, the development of higher density areas around Cockburn Central, with its rail 

links into inner Perth, Rockingham and Mandurah, and the proposed revitalisation and 

regeneration of Hamilton Hill, Spearwood and Coolbellup, are likely to provide housing 

opportunities to younger and older smaller household types in higher density 

developments. 

The different periods of settlement in the history of the City mean that suburbs across 

Cockburn are now at differing lifecycle stages. 

In the older areas of the City, such as Spearwood and Coolbellup, the original settlers have 

passed on, resulting in a diversity of age groups. Areas such as Yangebup and, to a lesser 

extent, Hamilton Hill have experienced some new residential development over recent 

years resulting in some regeneration of the area. The population in older areas such as Bibra 

Lake, Leeming and North Lake, are undergoing an ageing process and, as children leave 

home, a growth in the number of older and smaller household types. 

More recently developed areas such as Atwell, and suburbs such as Beeliar and Success, 

which are likely to be fully developed in the near future, are likely to age over time with 

fewer opportunities for young families to move into the area. 

It is also expected that Hammond Park and Aubin Grove will develop substantially over the 

next ten years, repeating the pattern of development in Success and Atwell, attracting 

young and prospective families, with a relatively large proportion of pre‐school aged 

children. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Migration flows, City of Cockburn, 2001 to 2006 (from City of Cockburn website 2010) 

Note: The migration flows depicted above do not represent future or forecast migration 

flows. The arrows represent migration flows to the LGA/SLA as a whole and do not indicate 

an origin or destination for any specific localities within the LGA/SLA. 

As described above, different areas within the City of Cockburn have slightly different 

functions based on both era of development and amount of new housing opportunities. 

Bibra Lake and Munster are expected to attract some younger families, whilst losing some 

young adults leaving home and Jandakot, Leeming and North Lake are expected to attract 

older families, similarly losing young adults. Success and Beeliar are expected to continue to 

attract families in their development phase. 

New development areas such as Aubin Grove and Hammond Park are expected to attract a 

large number of young families with children, whilst Cockburn Central, Yangebup, Hamilton 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Hill, Coolbellup and Spearwood by contrast are expected to attract young adults in similar 

fashion to an inner city area. Finally, Coogee ‐ North Coogee are likely to attract older 

smaller households and older families seeking the lifestyle opportunities offered by master 

planned coastal estates. The variety of function and role of the small areas in the City of 

Cockburn means that population outcomes differ significantly across the LGA. 

There are also significant differences in the supply of residential property within the City 

which will also have a major influence in structuring different population and household 

futures over the forecast period to 2031. There remains significant further potential within 

the existing growth areas of Success and Aubin Grove with new 'greenfield' opportunities 

being identified in Hammond Park. There is also additional potential through high density 

developments in and around Cockburn Central, as well as smaller opportunities offered by 

the re‐development of market gardens in Munster. Substantial interest in group dwelling 

development in the more urban parts of the city (Hamilton Hill, Spearwood and Coolbellup) 

is also likely to occur as these areas redevelop. 

Populationbased Planning of Schools 

A new primary school is planned for Aubin Grove, opening in approximately 2011. The 

Education Department is monitoring population in the Coogee area, with a possible primary 

school at South Beach being established if required. While the Department is confident that 

there is plenty of capacity in local high schools, stakeholders were concerned that there is 

an emerging need for a high school to service the Hammond Park and Aubin Grove region in 

the near future. 

4.2 CURRENT CITY OF COCKBURN SERVICES & FACILITIES AND 

ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE 

The Family Services team provided the project team with details of current City of Cockburn 

services, as follows: 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Childcare Services 

o FAMILY DAY CARE (FDC): 

Quality childcare provided in FDC Provider’s home with Providers being State‐ 

licensed. Cockburn Scheme selects, monitors care, provides training and support for 

quality outcomes for children. Currently 70 FDC Providers are caring for 500 plus 

children per week. The Scheme has been rated for its National Quality Assurance as 

High Quality. Quality Assurance requires a rigorous process of independent 

assessment by the Commonwealth and feedback from parents, family day care 

providers and other stakeholders. Commonwealth Child Care Benefit and 50% Child 

Care Rebate is available to eligible families. 

o OUT OF SCHOOL HOURS CARE (OSHC): 

Providing 1 Before School centre & 5 After School Care centres for children 5‐12 yrs; 

and Vacation Care programs for children 5‐12 yrs. The 5 OSHC centres have been 

rated for its National Quality Assurance as High Quality. Quality Assurance requires a 

rigorous process of independent assessment from the relevant authority and 

feedback from parents staff and key stakeholders. There are currently 243 families 

with 378 children in OSHC. 

o IN‐HOME CHILD CARE (IHC): 

Childcare provided in child’s family home by registered IHC Providers, who are 

selected and supported through the Cockburn Program. IHC Commonwealth criteria: 

Families who have no access to existing Child Care Services and who have either 3 or 

more children under school age, work shift work or non standard hours, or have a 

parent or child with a disability or illness. Commonwealth Child Care Benefit and 50% 

Child Care Rebate available to eligible families. Cockburn IHC Program is the largest 

in the metro area, currently operating with 100 + children, 43 IHC Providers and 50+ 

EFT places. 

Family Services 

o COCKBURN EARLY YEARS: A grant‐funded service delivering a home‐visiting program 

for families & children 0‐6 yrs, plus parenting & parent/child groups. The ‘Parenting 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

by Connection’ groups run quarterly with approximately 12 parent participants, and 

the ‘Sing and Play’ language‐delay group runs quarterly for approximately 10 parents 

and their children. Early Years runs activities and play sessions each school holidays 

for about 30 parents and their children. The Service home‐visits up to 30 families, 

weekly or fortnightly, over a six month period, for up to 8 sessions or longer for 

families that need additional support. 

o CHILDREN’S DEVELOPMENT: a part‐time Council position providing information to 

residents on playgroups, toy libraries, schools, childcare, child health, and other 

services; co‐ordination of annual Events for families (Hello Baby for babies/infants; 

Teddy Bears Picnic for toddlers); the annual School & Council Liaison Forum; a 3 Year 

Old Playclub at Atwell; provision of a quarterly newsletter for parents called 

‘Cockburn Kids’; co‐ordination of Early Years strategy, Children’s Interest Group, the 

AEDI (Australian Early Development Index) & Buster the Fun Bus mobile playgroup. 

o ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: supports & develops programs/services 

for and with the local Aboriginal community. This position is involved in the ‘My 

Time’ parenting group for Aboriginal families and participates in the annual Events 

for families & children, including NAIDOC week, Reconciliation Week, & the 

Kulunga’s Christmas party. Staff will be involved in the development of Council’s 

Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) due to be completed by December 2010. This Plan 

will include an Implementation Plan with key strategies to be addressed within a 2 

year timeframe. 

o DISABILITY ACCESS & INCLUSION: supports & develops programs/services that 

enhance participation for children and adults with a disability. This includes advocacy 

for the needs of children; liaison with schools; application for grants to support 

access & inclusion in after school & holiday programs; and the co‐ordination of the 

annual Celebrate Ability event for children & adults with a disability. 

o FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: Two free services for Cockburn residents, working with 

parents/caregivers to prevent isolation and maintain healthy wellbeing in families. 

This is done through short term counselling, information, advocacy, referrals and 

group provision. Some groups and events that run regularly are: 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

- The Beeliar Hub, provided in collaboration with Child Health, averaging 90 

Youth Services 

families and 130 young children attending per semester. 

- Worldly Wise Women’s group ‐ average attendance per semester of 14 

mothers and 15 children (in crèche) 

- The annual International Families Day Event, attracting about 92 adults and 

children. 

o Working out of Cockburn Youth Centre, Success, offering term programs for young 

people 10 – 24 years; outreach youth work; a very popular ‘Outrage’ School Holiday 

Program available each week of the holiday period; and ‘Nurture’ group for parents 

under the age of 25 years and their dependents, running during the school term. A 

youth worker offers case management for children as young as 10 who are at risk of 

having contact with the juvenile justice system. 

Library Services 

o Some of the key services delivered to children are: Storytime, held twice a week at 

Spearwood & Success Libraries and once a week at Coolbellup Library; BookStars 

(Book club for primary aged children) run every 3 months at Spearwood & 

Coolbellup Libraries only; Pram Jams (storytelling for 0‐18mth olds) run fortnightly or 

once a month at different libraries; school holiday activities for 5‐12 year olds; and 

‘Better Beginnings’ free bags (book, pamphlets, CD) for families given out via Child 

Health. 

Recreation and Culture 

o The bulk of participation in sport is juniors aged 5‐12 years. Youth Active Program 

provides financial assistance for children who want to do sport but can’t afford it, by 

paying registration fees. Approximately 150‐180 kids (20% Indigenous) participate. 

The JTA (Junior Travel Assistance) program assists City of Cockburn young people 18 

yrs and under for any state/national representation, with funding of about 

$350/person, per year upon application. 

o There are about 19 clubs within the City who cater for well over 5000 athletes under 

the age of 18 ys, including the new Success Regional Sporting Facility which has huge 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

potential for future growth. Some clubs have up to 300 participants in the 5‐8 year 

age range. Council is introducing new junior clubs to the Eastern side of the city and 

developing new facilities eg: Sports clubs, children’s spaces. Council assists all clubs 

with their daily management issues and is the main point of contact for all clubs. 

o Aubin Grove has new clubrooms with a room for community groups to hire e.g. 

mothers groups, and Hammond Park will accommodate OSHC. There are also many 

private organisations which utilise Council facilities to provide dance, martial arts, 

tennis, and gymnastics to children. Please refer to the City’s Recreation Plan for 

additional information. 

o Southlake Leisure Centre provides a broad range of recreational and aquatic 

opportunities and activities for primary school aged children and their families. 

o Azelia Ley Homestead at Manning Park is run as a Museum open to the public. Staff 

there also provide activities largely for primary aged children during school holiday 

periods, and historic family‐focused events, as well as collaborating with other staff 

for community events such as ‘Hello Baby’. 

Community Development 

Parks 

o Facilitates a networking group, the Regional Parents Group which is made up of 

Parents and Friends groups (P&C’s, P&F’s) largely from primary schools, and a lot of 

issues are raised here. Community organisations and volunteers are the key target 

group, encompassing some groups specifically related to children. Council staff work 

at strengthening capacity building and resilience for community organisations. 

o Develops and manages parks, playgrounds and open spaces across the City. The City 

has a Passive Parks Study that guides the future development of parks across the 

City. In conjunction with Human and Community Services, Parks has developed some 

innovative Playgrounds. For example through Council’s ‘Friendship Way’ (Sister 

Cities) program the Parks area has developed an understanding of the Croatian 

community, resulting in some parks being designed to include cultural aspects such 

as benches with backgammon, seats named after an island in former Yugoslavia and 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Environmental Services 

o The main program run is the ‘Environmental Education Initiatives for Primary Schools 

Program’, covering 4 broad themes of Greenhouse Gas, Biodiversity, Resource Use 

and Liveable Communities, with the target age group being mostly 6‐12 years. 

Council works in partnership with the Wetlands Centre at Bibra Lake, offering the 

‘Get Wild About Wetlands’ program in the school holidays, for children aged 4 years 

up but most popular with the 7‐12 year olds. 

There is also a pilot program being delivered at the Cockburn Youth Centre, an 

‘ENVIRONmentals’ program with different topics, eg; ‘Wacky About Waste’, for the 

10 plus age group. 

Where stakeholders identified an additional service, this was included in the composite list 

of services which is in Attachment 4. 

Feedback Regarding Existing Services 

Feedback was gathered from a broad range of stakeholders who contributed to the project. 

The City of Cockburn’s Childcare and Family Services teams are seen externally as innovative 

and creative in identifying gaps, determining service options and funding, and partnering 

with other organisations (eg Department for Child Protection, Department for Communities) 

to develop services in areas of need. Service providers see the City of Cockburn as a good 

program partner, ready to respond to unmet needs and to be innovative in developing 

program responses. 

Parents were positive about the services provided: 

“meets my needs very well – especially library services” 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

“Hello Baby was great this year” 

“toy library meets my needs very well” 

“I don’t know where I’d be without J” (ie Early Years support worker) 

“its nice to see Cockburn looking into growing Children’s Services. I already feel they 

take it seriously compared to other Councils, keep going with the good work.” 

There was also feedback from parents that existing services are under pressure from 

increased numbers of families and children. These include Buster the Fun Bus, and the 

library programs such as Pram Jams at Success. 

4.3 POLICY TRENDS 

The documents or websites used to research the policy trends are listed in Attachment 5. 

The 2009 report to the WA Parliament’s Community Development and Justice Standing 

Committee on developmental needs of children stated that the wealth of scientific research 

around childhood development is truly staggering, and that importantly, the research tells 

us that a child’s intellectual, emotional and social development are deeply interconnected 

and that experiences in the first three years of life are critical for optimum development in 

all these areas. 

This reinforces the wisdom of the City’s establishment of its Early Years Program (previously 

Early Education Program) around 15 years ago, in partnership with and funded by the (now) 

Department for Communities. While the City was in a sense ‘ahead of the pack’ for Early 

Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), in the establishment of this program, the new policy 

complexities around federal and state government COAG (Council of Australian 

Governments) initiatives which recently have been commenced, have added confusion to an 

established and sound program framework. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

As stated in the 2009 report, ‘A Strategic Assessment of the Children’s Services Industry’, for 

the South Australian Children’s Services Subcommittee of the Community and Disability 

Services Ministers’ Advisory Council, the proposed changes are seen as exciting and 

challenging, with service hubs bringing together health, education and child care and 

providing targeted services for particular groups. 

While the City has been ahead in innovation of new service provision, there is a need for 

additional Children’s Services resources for it to remain ‘around the table’, contributing to 

children’s policy development and assessing local impacts to existing services as the COAG 

policies are bedded down. 

Council of Australian Governments (COAG) reforms 

The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) has made a commitment to pursuing 

substantial reforms in the areas of education, skills and early childhood development. For 

early childhood, this includes ensuring that children are born healthy and have access to the 

support, care and education throughout early childhood that will equip them for life and 

learning and that is delivered in a way that actively engages parents and meets their 

workforce participation needs. 

This reform agenda has a number of elements, including a National Early Childhood 

Development Strategy to ensure all children have the best start in life to create a better 

future for themselves and for the nation. 

The National Quality Agenda for Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) is an important 

part of the National Early Childhood Development Strategy. It builds on the National 

Partnership Agreement between the Australian Government and State and Territory 

Governments on early childhood education. The agreement involves governments working 

together to provide all Australian children with access to a quality preschool program in the 

year before formal schooling. 

In 2009 COAG agreed to a proposed approach involving an integrated national system. The 

2009 policy overview of ECEC quality reforms report states that the regulatory system will 

have the following features: 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

• a unified national system to replace current licensing and quality assurance 

processes 

• a single set of improved national standards that encompass and integrate education 

and care, with current standards that are stronger than the original agreed national 

standards 

• Standards will initially apply to Long Day Care, Family Day Care, preschool services 

and Outside School Hours Care services regardless of location or setting 

• joint governance of the national quality system, to allow the perspective of all 

jurisdictions to be taken into account in the operation of the national system 

• a national body or bodies with joint governance arrangements to oversee the 

administration of the national system; 

• no duplication of regulation across levels of government or sectors, with individual 

services needing to deal with only one organisation for regulation against the 

standards; and 

• jurisdictions not moving unilaterally to increase standards in the future, with the 

ability in a small number of selected areas to increase standards in a State or 

Territory by agreement between that State/Territory and the Commonwealth 

following discussion by the national body. 

The standards for assessing children’s services will comprise seven areas known to be key 

elements in the assessment of service quality. These areas capture aspects critical to the 

provision of ECEC services and known to be important to parents: 

• Educational program and practice; 

• Children’s wellbeing, health and safety; 

• Physical environment; 

• Staffing arrangements, including staff to child ratios and qualifications; 

• Relationships; 

• Collaborative partnerships with families and communities; and 

• Leadership and service management. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Development of the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) 

The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) has been developed collaboratively by the 

Australian and State and Territory Governments with substantial input from the early 

childhood sector and early childhood academics. The Framework has incorporated feedback 

from an extensive consultation process, including two national symposiums, national public 

consultation forums, focus groups, an online forum and case‐study trials. With the adoption 

of the Framework and related changes by COAG, the federal government’s Office of Early 

Childhood Education and Child Care is responsible for the current implementation of 

changes in early childhood education and care. 

On 2 July 2009, COAG endorsed the Early Years Learning Framework. Implementation of the 

Framework has now commenced. At this introductory stage, with consultations and 

information sessions being held around the country, early childhood services such as those 

at the City of Cockburn are expected to familiarise themselves with the Early Years Learning 

Framework and map their existing practice against the principles and practice outlined in 

the Framework. It is expected that, following a period of familiarisation, each early 

childhood service will develop their own strategy to implement the Framework, taking their 

own unique context into consideration. State government agencies such as the Department 

for Communities, the Education Department of WA are part of state based committees 

overseeing implementation of the Framework. 

As first steps to implementing the Framework, the City will need to address staffing levels 

and qualifications, and will need to look at support and training issues. Resources including 

an Educators’ Guide are being developed to support the implementation of the Early Years 

Learning Framework. The Professional Support Coordinators (PSC) and the Indigenous 

Professional Support Unit (IPSU) networks in each state and territory will be able to deliver 

assistance and support for implementing the EYLF to Commonwealth Government funded 

services. 

The PSC and IPSU are currently assessing the needs of the sector and delivering support on 

EYLF matters. This has commenced initially with assistance for familiarising services with the 

Framework. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

The City should establish connections to Yorganup Association Incorporated and the Child 

Inclusive Learning and Development Australia Inc to remain connected with developments 

in training and development of staff. These are important matters for workforce 

development and retention of children’s service staff in the future. 

State budget impacts on services in Cockburn 

Out of School Hours Care (OSHC): A dialogue is emerging around the role of schools in 

provision and/or sponsoring of Out of School Hours Care (OSHC), a service which the City 

has been providing for many years. Information from the Fremantle/Peel Regional 

education office is that establishment of OSHC is not expected to occur in schools for at 

least two years, whereas the Department for Communities encourages schools to take up 

provision of these services sooner. A review of the City’s OSHC services in the light of the 

standards being implemented as part of the COAG changes, as well as staffing and 

education requirements for these services, is needed to look in detail at each service and its 

catchment area/matching school and questions of viability. Services for children with a 

disability and for Indigenous children are particularly hard to access after school hours, and 

while the City has put forward a tender for vacation care for children with a disability, this 

will reduce waiting lists but not alleviate the OSHC gap. 

Occasional Care Programs: Two Occasional Care services have operated out of the 

Cockburn area for some time; Little Jitters which is currently in Bibra Lake, and the 

Yangebup Occasional Care at Yangebup Family Centre. They have both been recently hit 

with severe funding cuts from the Commonwealth Government such that the State 

Government has agreed to pick up the 52% Federal contribution for the time being just to 

keep the services operating. This is not able to be on‐going, and with the State Government 

review of all funded services due out by Sept 2010, it is looking unlikely that Occasional Care 

will be able to continue past that time. This is a huge loss for the specific market that it 

services, of parents with Post natal depression, isolated parents, fly in/fly out families and 

other families in need. There will be on‐going discussions about this issue. 

Homework and other Indigenous Programs: Active dialogue with schools regarding 

homework programs for Indigenous children has been sought by the City’s Aboriginal 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Reference Group (ARG). One example of such programs is the Kulunga Club Program run 

from East Hamilton Hill Primary School, with start up funding provided by Council’s Early 

Years Group, and more of these programs are sought by the ARG. There is an identified 

need for Indigenous children’s programs in Coolbellup, Beeliar, Yangebup, which ideally 

could operate out of primary schools. 

Disability services: During the stakeholder consultations as part of the project, there was 

widespread concern from diverse stakeholders about limitations in government health 

services for young people and children, particularly in early intervention. While there are 

tight budget restrictions on such services, while the City’s population continues to increase, 

and the incidence of disability/disadvantage also increase (as evidenced by the AEDI 

results), this State government gap has been partly met by the City’s Early Years program, 

which is at maximum capacity for the current level of funding and in fact requires additional 

funding to service emerging eastern areas of the City and Indigenous families. There were 

similar needs identified regarding support to access education services by children with a 

disability and children experiencing disadvantage. These included homework programs, 

after school care and vacation care programs. 

Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) 

The Federal Government has established two interrelated initiatives collecting relevant, 

coherent and systematic data to support evidence based policy to guide Early Childhood 

Education and Care (ECEC) practice. These are the Australian Early Development Index 

(AEDI) and ‘Growing up in Australia’ – a Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). 

The AEDI is a population measure of children’s development in communities across 

Australia. The results pinpoint strengths in the community as well as what can be improved. 

The AEDI provides information to help us build and strengthen our communities for our 

children and for Australia. Communities play a crucial role in influencing early childhood 

development. To thrive, children need both supportive and caring families and 

communities. Supporting children in the years before school greatly increases their chances 

of a successful transition to school and better learning outcomes while at school. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

The purpose of the AEDI is to measure the health and development of populations of 

children to help communities assess how well they are doing in supporting young children 

and their families. Previously there has been no way to monitor early child development at a 

community level or to understand how local circumstances might be changed to improve 

children's life chances. 

The City participated in the AEDI research during the pilot stage in 2006, resulting in 

important indicators becoming available on the unique needs of children in the City, and 

projects and strategies being developed as outcomes of the results for Cockburn. For 

example the AEDI results for South Lake indicated that children in that area scored highly (ie 

more vulnerable) on the language indicators. This has important implications for the City in 

considering families trying to access speech, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and other 

support services for their child from services such as the State Health Departments 

Southwell Child Development Centre. There are now reportedly delays in accessing a full 

service at the Centre of 6‐18 months, due to lack of sufficient funding to meet increased 

need. This matter is also highlighted as a very serious concern by many stakeholders to the 

project, including the WA Commissioner for Children and Young People. 

In 2009, the AEDI was completed nationwide for the first time. Between 1 May and 31 July, 

information was collected on 261,203 children (97.5 per cent of the estimated national five‐ 

year‐old population). This involved 15,528 teachers from 7423 Government, Catholic and 

Independent schools around Australia. 

The initial results (available in June 2010) provide us with a national picture of children’s 

health and development – a first for Australia. The results for City of Cockburn are currently 

being evaluated and will be presented to Council and to the public in late 2010. These 

results will influence planning and implementation over the next period of time. 

Early Years Strategy 

The West Australian Government developed an Early Years Strategy approximately a decade 

ago. Various sites (mainly geographical) were identified as early years sites and were eligible 

for additional funding. Coolbellup and Hamilton Hill were nominated as an Early Years Site 

and development funding was used by the City of Cockburn for 3 years to employ staff, form 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

an early years steering group, Coolbellup Hamilton Hill Early Years Action Group (CHEYAG), 

and run programs. The grant‐funded Council program ran an Aboriginal playgroup, a 

Nyungar Mums and Kids workshop series, multicultural music workshops, a multicultural 

playgroup and a variety of community events. The program also encouraged and provided 

support for other initiatives such as an Aboriginal Kids Club in a local school. 

The funding has ceased and the strategy has been in a process of change for a couple of 

years now, but the CHEYAG group has combined with others to become part of a broader 

early years umbrella group, South West Early Years Metro Interest Group (SWEYMIG), 

covering Cockburn, Melville, Fremantle and East Fremantle. This group acts as a lobby group 

and information resource to promote the significance of the early years in children’s 

development. 

At a recent early years forum, staff from a number of local government authorities 

expressed the need for early years to be back on the agenda and to have a higher profile at 

local and state government levels. 

WA Commissioner for Children and Young People 

Western Australia’s first Commissioner for Children and Young People, Michelle Scott, was 

appointed on 7 December 2007, with children and young people from WA being involved in 

the interviewing and selection. The Commissioner is officially appointed by the WA 

Governor for a term of 5 years. 

The following key themes have been identified and incorporated in the Commissioner’s 

Strategic Plan for 2009 ‐ 12: 

• Promote and monitor the wellbeing of children and young people, particularly in the 

areas of early childhood, youth justice, housing, preventative health and mental 

health. Include the positive contributions that they make to their communities 

• Ensure the views and opinions of children and young people are heard, through their 

active participation 

• Respond to population growth and increasing numbers of children and young people 

• Evidence‐based decision making ‐ monitoring outcomes of programs for children and 

young people, and using the evidence to develop and expand best‐practice models 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

• Closing the gap ‐ addressing the ongoing disadvantage experienced by Aboriginal 

children and young people 

• Stronger collaboration and cooperation between State and Federal governments, 

the not for profit sector and industry 

• Advocate for the review of budget and funding processes to enable agencies to 

commit to long term, sustainable children’s services. 

In a speech in July 2010, the Commissioner emphasised the important role Local 

Government has to play in supporting young children and their families, urging Local 

Government agencies to make the early years a priority in their service planning. The 

Commissioner also recommended that Local Government Authorities consult with children 

and families to ensure they take a child‐friendly approach to urban planning and create 

developmentally rich play opportunities for children. As citizens, children and young people 

should be involved in decision making that affects their lives. 

The Commissioner’s Office provides information and support in the development of child‐ 

friendly consultation and active participation in an organisation, and in the establishment of 

children’s advisory groups and other participation mechanisms. 

Communities for Children (CfC) 

Communities for Children (CfC) is part of the new federal government’s Family Support 

Program which provides prevention and early intervention programs to families with 

children up to 12 years, who are at risk of disadvantage and who are disconnected from 

childhood services. CfC works towards ensuring that children have the best possible start in 

life by focusing on well‐targeted early intervention approaches that bring about positive 

outcomes for young children and their families. Some of these include home visiting, early 

learning and literacy programs, early development of social and communication skills, 

parenting and family support programs, child nutrition, and community events to celebrate 

the importance of children, families and the early years. CfC was part of the former Stronger 

Families and Communities Strategy. 

It appears that there are no early intervention service providers under this program in the 

Cockburn region. Communities for Children sites are funded in Kwinana and in Armadale. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

‘Local answers’ mentoring for children of prisoners, was not funded in the City despite the 

reported high level of families with a parent in custodial care in the Spearwood area. In the 

Community investment program, none are established in Cockburn. 

Protecting Children is Everyone’s Business 

This federal program developed and administered through the Department of Families, 

Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) is part of the National 

Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children. In Western Australia, this program has been 

implemented by the Department of Child Protection including its Best Beginnings program. 

Resources have been directed to the City’s Early Years Program from the Best Beginnings 

Program as Early Years staff are part of the Fremantle Team, taking a small caseload. 

Additionally, the Department of Child Protection is reviewing its current approach and 

developing a new approach, to be released later in 2010. This is ‘A Strategic Framework and 

State Plan for Supporting Individuals and Families At‐risk’. There will be impacts on funding 

availability for the City from the implementation of this Framework and Plan. 

No Wrong Door – first door, right door 

The Department of Health & Ageing in Victoria demonstrates the capacity for families and 

individuals to access the right service no matter how they connect with a service provider 

network. Its ‘No Wrong Door – first door, right door’ service formally recognizes that 

individuals with a dual diagnosis (eg mental health, parenting disadvantage) may enter a 

range of community service sites; that they are a high priority for engagement and that 

proactive efforts are necessary to welcome them into treatment. Through the program, 

each individual needing treatment will be identified and assessed and will receive 

treatment, either directly or through appropriate referral, no matter where he or she enters 

the realm of services. 

This new model of integrated service delivery, reported on the Department’s website, is 

pivotal to the new initiatives being developed through all federal government initiatives for 

children and families. The City will need to examine how their existing services match with 

this model, and in order to be successful in accessing federal funding in the future will need 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

to demonstrate such an approach as well as the service outcomes to be achieved for 

children. 

New Income Management 

Community organisations are funded by the Australian Government, through the Financial 

Management Program, to deliver money management and financial counselling services to 

help people subject to income management and others in the community to develop the 

skills to appropriately use their income support payments. Recent changes made through a 

COAG agreement (2009) have increased availability of funds for this program administered 

through the federal Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous 

Affairs (FaHCSIA) who will identify if any new or expanded financial management support 

services are needed to support new income management. Funding has been provided up to 

2014 to expand money management and financial counselling services, and deliver financial 

literacy education to assist people to build their money management skills and help those in 

financial crisis. One of the deliverables for families with children accessing this scheme may 

be provision of vouchers as part of Centrelink payments for use in purchasing essential 

services and consumables for the use of children. 

City of Cockburn provides two Financial Counselling Services with 1.5 staff employed for 

each program. These are based in Coolbellup & Atwell but service all Cockburn residents. 

There is constantly increasing demand for these services from residents in all areas. 

4.4 THE CHILDCARE SERVICES INDUSTRY TRENDS 

The achievement of Australia’s ambitious goals in relation to the national changes is made 

more complex by the market in childcare services. 

Almost 75% of Australian long day care is provided by the private, for profit sector. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

While recent corporate changes have reduced the level of market concentration by one 

provider, the private sector has contributed to a rapid expansion of long day care places 

since the early 1990’s. 

The mixed market is a central feature of the Australian childcare services industry and will 

remain so for the foreseeable future. 

Such market features require close attention to the enhancement and monitoring of service 

quality, emphasised in the proposed COAG changes. 

The 2009 report ‘A Strategic Assessment of the Children’s Services Industry’ prepared for 

the South Australian Ministerial Council states that international literature and a small 

number of Australian research studies show a trend for the highest quality care to be 

associated with non‐profit and independent private providers, and the poorest quality care 

with corporate chains. 

The 2009 report recommended that further evidence based research needs to be 

undertaken to test the relevance of these findings in Australia and to develop strategies to 

ensure that high quality is being delivered in all settings. 

Regional cross‐sectoral meetings such as the South West Metro Children’s Services Meeting, 

which has been held several times a year over many years now & is organised by the City of 

Cockburn, play an important role in keeping service providers connected and informed of 

the latest trends & changes, and of each other’s programs. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 5 CONSULTATIONS 

The City’s working group approved the project team’s consultation and communication 

plans which included the use of the City’s publications and web opportunities to promote 

the project and encourage participation. A brochure was developed (Attachment 6) as a 

paper‐based questionnaire and also placed on the City’s website. 

The City’s working group and the project team considered a wide range of stakeholders who 

should have the opportunity to contribute their views to the project. Family Services staff 

undertook individual interviews with the City’s staff, using an interview questionnaire 

(Attachment 7) and a workshop was also held with Human Services staff. The consultancy 

team also met with the City’s Aboriginal Reference Group and Disability Reference Group. 

The Team adopted an outreach approach and workshops were held for parents at the South 

Lake Ottey Family & Neighbourhood Centre, the Early Years program sausage sizzle, the 

Gateways walking group and the Spearwood library Pram Jam. 

The participation guidelines developed by the Commissioner for Children and Young People 

informed the processes used to consult with children across the City. Avenues for 

connecting with children were at an after school hours care service, the City’s Youth Centre, 

and Cockburn Skate Park. As well as returning the questionnaire brochure via email/mail, 

some parents took the opportunity to phone the project team to share their views. 

The project heard from 41 families and from 28 children, 22 state government 

officers/agency staff/service providers, and attended 4 group meetings with City Staff and 

Reference Group members. Approximately 10 people were in attendance at the Aboriginal 

Reference Group consultation, and 15 at the Disability Reference Group. There were 24 City 

of Cockburn staff who contributed to the consultations. 

A record of all people who contributed to the development of the Plan can be seen at 

Attachment 8. 

The results of analysis of all the views provided to the project team can be seen in the next 

part of the Plan. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 6 GAP AND NEEDS ANALYSIS 

Need for a Child and FamilyFriendly City 

The City’s 2008 Community Needs Survey identified that people are attracted to the City of 

Cockburn because it offers affordable housing, is in close proximity to Fremantle and the 

beach, and family and friends live close by. Residents are committed to stay in the area 

because the quality of life is perceived to be high, and improving. 

On this basis alone, there is a clear need for the City of Cockburn to be a child and family 

friendly city, while the demographic changes identified in the previous chapter confirm the 

increasing numbers as well as percentages of young people and families living in the region. 

Services and facilities which are used and appreciated by Cockburn residents (including 

young people) who contributed to this Plan, include the libraries, playgrounds, childcare 

services, toy library, youth centre (including for young people with a disability), family day 

care, Early Years program (in home support, talks, support). 

A large number of residents and service providers reported that it is good to see the City of 

Cockburn taking children’s services seriously compared to other local governments. 

A significant number of parents and service providers noted where there were pressures on 

existing services reflecting the changes in the demographic across the City, limiting access 

for children, particularly children with a disability or who were disadvantaged. 

There were a large number of positive views about the City’s children’s services as can be 

seen in PART 4: SITUATION ANALYSIS. Following analysis of the feedback through the 

consultation process, it was identified that there are a range of Key Gaps and Needs which 

analysis of the research indicated, and stakeholders wished the City to consider in 

developing plans for action over the next five years. 

These broadly covered: 

1. Provision of early intervention health services for children, sufficient to address 

need 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

2. Gaps in services for children 7‐9 years (after school, vacation and club activities) 

3. Parenting and other early childhood services 

4. The impact of changing policies and emerging trends. 

More detail is provided below on each of these four key points. 

6.1 PROVISION OF EARLY INTERVENTION HEALTH SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, 

SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS NEED 

The current level of funding for State government allied health staff providing early 

intervention services in the City of Cockburn was seen by all stakeholders as negatively 

impacting on an integrated service response to children and families. Of major concern 

to stakeholders, including service providers, parents, and other State government 

officers eg the Commissioner for Youth and Children, are the delays in accessing early 

intervention therapy services (reported to be between 6 and 18 months’ delay) at the 

Southwell Child Development Centre. 

This significant gap has had a direct impact in putting pressure on the City of Cockburn’s 

Early Years Program (funded through the Department for Communities) which supports 

parents of very young children, who rely on advice from the program’s staff on 

parenting and health matters. This Program has filled an important role in offering 

services to parents on the waitlist for Southwell Child Development Centre, via its direct 

work with parent and child, a home visiting program, and availability of groups such as 

‘Sing and Play’ for children with language or other developmental delays. 

The City’s service is valued highly by users and other service providers, however it is at 

maximum capacity and the lack of adequate complementary resources from the State 

government is having a direct impact on its sustainability. 

Parents reported that due to delays in accessing therapy services for their young 

children some need to self‐fund the early intervention programs from the private sector, 

or risk their child missing critical developmental support in their early years. Where 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

families are not able to self‐fund, young children miss out, resulting in potential life‐long 

outcomes of disadvantage. 

Parents also advised that as a result of Health Department of WA policies, they have to 

travel to Hilton for immunisation services for their children which is problematic for 

parents without vehicles and a long trip via bus services with young children. 

Strategy 1 

Continue gathering data and evidence of disadvantage for children in the early 

years who cannot access allied health services within an appropriate timeframe. 

Advocate to the relevant bodies for increased resources to better meet the needs 

of this significant gap in services. 

Strategy 2 

Advocate to the state government for expansion of immunisation services across 

the Cockburn region. 

6.2 GAPS IN SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 7 – 9 YEARS (AFTERSCHOOL, VACATION 

AND CLUB ACTIVITIES) 

While there are significant services focusing on early intervention, with more recent 

support from the COAG federal and state government policy initiatives for early 

childhood (children aged 0 – 8 years of age), there was general agreement amongst the 

diverse range of stakeholders (parents, Indigenous groups, and service providers) that 

there is a lack of policy focus and therefore, funding and services, for children aged 7 – 9 

years of age. 

Strategy 3 

The City’s Human Services Team and the Youth Services Team to review services 

for children aged 7‐9 years of age on a six monthly basis, identifying any emerging 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

gaps and opportunities for service provision. A ‘report card’ to be developed and 

provided on a six monthly basis, to promote the needs and interests of children 

from this age group living in the City. 

The Cockburn Youth Centre in Success provides a focus for a wide range of activities for 

young people and has been commended for its opportunities for young people with a 

disability and young people from cultural and linguistically diverse backgrounds. 

The Cockburn Youth Centre is seen by stakeholders as a successful example of 

integrated services, with co‐located support services providing counselling and support 

for young people (eg St John of God Inc, Community Youth Team, Mental Health 

Services, Drug and Alcohol Services), working with Youth Centre staff, and available for 

referral. 

The planned development on the adjacent vacant land (the ‘Integrated Health and 

Community Services Facility’) will provide additional services, also based on an 

integrated services model, to a greater range of people. 

Within the Youth Centre, access by children from refugee families has been facilitated as 

part of an integrated response from the City and related refugee support services. 

Access by Indigenous young people is reportedly hampered in some situations by the 

need for membership payment, and for transport costs, however strategies are in place 

to provide flexibility in response to these needs. 

Strategy 4 

Promote the availability of Youth Centre fees being waivered for young people 

where they are at‐risk and suffering financial hardship. 

Infrastructure development, planned by the City through its Sport and Recreation 

Strategic Plan, to upgrade parks and sporting facilities (including the swimming pool) will 

provide improved services and activities for this age group. Capacity building for sporting 

clubs and associations also identified in the Plan will enhance opportunities for an 

increased number of young people to participate in community based teams of a wider 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

range of sports and increase the likelihood of sustainability of these activities in the 

future. 

Children attending one of the City’s Out of School Hours Care services were invited to 

discuss their needs and wants for children across the city. Their comments reflected 

their ideas that while some appreciated the parks and opportunities, there still appeared 

to be a need to improve these facilities and activities to accommodate changing 

interests eg; scooter use, ball game and skate park spaces, improved supervision at 

skate parks and improved transport: 

“the park is too small for the bigger people; there is not a lot of things for big kids” 

“Basketball court, cricket nets, football oval” 

Strategy 5 

The City’s officers responsible for children’s services and for sport and recreation 

to work together on implementing the strategies for expanding sports clubs as per 

the City’s current Sport and Recreation Strategic Plan. 

A further reported need from the Disability Reference Group and from parents of 

children aged 6 – 12 was for clubs for children with preferences for ‘non‐sporting’ 

activities such as arts and cultural activities. Children with a disability were also 

interested in such activities which lessen the differentiation in ability resulting from 

physical and/or intellectual disability. The City’s disability access and inclusion service 

has details of those clubs available to children with a disability. Clubs were seen as 

important for after school or vacation care activities by parents across the City. 

Similarly to sporting clubs, community capacity building for non‐sporting activities is an 

important action to increase sustainability from any pilot project initiations. 

Stakeholders identified the City of Gosnells ‘Active Arvo’s’ as a model to consider for 

after school sporting and non‐sporting programs. Active Arvo’s is an exciting sports 

program introducing primary school aged children to a wide variety of different sports, 

teaching them the basic skills of each sport, an understanding of the rules and 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

encouraging teamwork in a fun and participatory environment. The cost is $50 per child 

per term. 

It was also suggested that such a program be based in a local school eg Phoenix, and 

target disadvantaged families and children, and that it could also link into Out of School 

Hours programs where relevant. 

Indigenous young people (both boys and girls) also reported that dance activities are 

valued, eg through local church groups. Parents of children with a disability reported 

that it is difficult to find a dance activity in which children with a disability can 

participate. 

Suggestions from the Children’s Consultation included: 

“some centres for gymnastics and some park benches to sit on” 

“swimming pool, rec centre, bike tracks, safety fences, go cart centre, playgrounds” 

“more slides, trampolines, tyre swings, flying foxes, spiders, monkey bars” 

“four square game, table tennis” 

Strategy 6 

The City’s officers responsible for children’s services, youth and for 

sport/recreation work together to investigate and support the provision of 

innovative models for ‘non‐sporting’ activities for children in the City. Provision of 

a database of existing activities be made available to parents and service 

providers, via varied means such as City website, Co‐Info and others. 

There were reports from child, parent and service providers about the effect of lack of 

activity options for young people in local parks and open areas, including trends towards 

bullying. The City’s program with the YMCA bus at the Coolbellup skate park is a 

valuable initiative to provide supervision in open areas, limit attention from the criminal 

element, and is viewed positively by young people, however there appears to be a need 

for similar further interventions to increase activity options, minimise potential for drug 

related activities and ameliorate the trend towards bullying and inter‐racial tensions for 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

this age group or from disparate age groups (eg young adults interaction with younger 

people). 

Comments from the Children’s Consultation included: 

“make another skate park and have it patrolled because there is a lot of litter and 

numerous drug dealers” 

“make a bigger skate park and BMX track” 

“better space to have a trampoline” 

“more space for games” 

Strategy 7 

The City investigates relevant initiatives, including working in partnership with 

other organisations where relevant, in the provision of interventions and safe 

active recreation activities for children and young people in popular parks and 

public open spaces. 

Suggestions from Aboriginal young people at the Coolbellup skate park included access 

to practice kits to reduce injuries, a rubber composite skate ramp, and toilets and 

drinking water. They felt that best practice would be to have separate venues/times for 

scooter users (younger children) as compared to skate board users (up to mid twenty 

years of age). 

The Children’s Consultation suggested: 

“a paint ball area for 10 years and up” and 

“a playground for 11+ years” 

Evidence has also been provided by Youth Services staff that there is a significant gender 

imbalance at the Skate Parks. The groups accessing Skate Parks are more than 90% male, 

with any females largely taking a passive role. This is an issue of concern in terms of 

inclusion, physical health & wellbeing, self‐image and self‐esteem of young women. 

Issues need to be discussed, areas of interest investigated and identified, and strategies 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

put in place to provide physical activities and public facilities that will be taken up by 

girls and young women. 

Strategy 8 

The City’s officers responsible for youth, sport/recreation and 

planning/infrastructure work in conjunction to provide optimal public sports 

facilities, and successful access of target groups to these facilities, in order to 

address the needs of different age, gender and specific user groups, eg scooter, 

skateboard. 

Children, youth, parents and services providers identified that lack of transport services 

across the City limited access to activities. 

The Children’s Consultation included comments on transport issues: 

“I think we should get a cab place built so that if you need to get home you could go 

there and get a taxi” 

“Trains; more footpaths” 

“more buses, taxi youth bus, trains” 

Strategy 9 

The City investigates cross‐City transport options, including the provision of a City 

bus service. 

6.3 PARENTING AND OTHER EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES 

A diverse range of services are provided to parents and children through the Human 

Services Team. These include the Early Years program, In Home Care, 3 Year Old 

Playclub, and Out‐of‐School‐Hours Care. Historically these have been funded through 

partnerships and state government sources. However, in the changing policy 

environment identified in PART 4, a new approach is required. Childcare and Children’s 

services are moving nationally to a highly sophisticated and regulated industry reflecting 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

children’s needs and achieving positive outcomes. While the City is seen as a service 

innovator, there is a need for increased sophistication in identifying outcomes, 

reviewing programs and achieving the resources required to provide a quality product. 

State government stakeholders stated that the City needs to be clear about who it is 

doing business with in the future – will this be the state or the federal government? 

With this clarity, the City can proceed with development of a business case to review 

and refine programs to be consistent with the new frameworks, and succeed in 

accessing funding for programs in the region. Stakeholders such as the Department of 

Child Protection have indicated that they will support such activities, including 

development of new programs, as their experience is that the City has had much success 

with innovative new programs in the past. 

Strategy 10 

Review and refine early years & early childhood programs, to be consistent with 

new federal and state funding frameworks. 

Strategy 11 

Identify and facilitate innovative new programs to meet needs gaps across the City 

eg; intergenerational, families with a parent in incarceration, fly‐in/fly‐out families. 

Strategy 12 

Continue to maintain and strengthen partnerships with the Department for Child 

Protection to develop new and/or expanded programs for families and children. 

Child Heath Services 

City of Cockburn and Department of Health have a partnership arrangement in the 

provision of Child health services, with Council providing building maintenance and 

Health Department providing staff. There are Child Health offices in 4 main locations 

across Cockburn ‐ South Lake; Yangebup; Atwell (including an outreach service to 

Success); and a Spearwood office covering Coolbellup/Hamilton Hill and Spearwood 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

area. There is also current discussion regarding the possibility of a part time outreach 

service operating from the Coolbellup Hub. There has been no increase in provision of 

child health staff or services in a number of years, despite the rapidly growing 

population in Cockburn. 

It is reported that there are between 30 and 40 new babies born each month in the 

Aubin Grove/Hammond Park region of the City. This has put a significant strain on 

existing services to support parents and provide child health services for these families, 

who live in very new areas which lack the infrastructure of older more developed areas 

of the City. 

Strategy 13 

Continue to maintain the partnership with the Department of Health for provision 

of child health services across the City. Advocate for the expansion of services as 

needs are identified. 

Playgrounds 

With the growing numbers of young children in the eastern corridor of the city it is 

important to take into consideration our increased understanding of the critical value of 

play and the provision of play environments for the optimal development of a child. 

‘Play is essential to development because it contributes to the cognitive, physical, social, 

and emotional well‐being of children and youth. Play also offers an ideal opportunity for 

parents to engage fully with their children. Play allows children to use their creativity 

while developing their imagination, dexterity, and physical, cognitive, and emotional 

strength. Play is important to healthy brain development. It is through play that children 

at a very early age engage and interact in the world around them. As they master their 

world, play helps children develop new competencies that lead to enhanced confidence 

and the resiliency they will need to face future challenges. In contrast to passive 

entertainment, play builds active, healthy bodies. In fact, it has been suggested that 

encouraging unstructured play may be an exceptional way to increase physical activity 

levels in children, which is one important strategy in the resolution of the obesity 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

epidemic. Perhaps above all, play is a simple joy that is a cherished part of childhood’. 

(‘The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining 

Strong Parent‐Child Bonds’, PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 No. 1 January 2007, Kenneth R. 

Ginsburg, MD, MSEd) 

The provision of stimulating, engaging and challenging play spaces for young children is 

perhaps of greater importance in current times than previously, due to the propensity 

towards passive entertainment & technology, time pressures on families, and the 

growth in obesity levels. 

Due to the large percentage of children in the south east quadrant and the lack of a 

Regional playground in this area there is a need to develop a Regional Playground for 

children of all ages and abilities. 

Comments from the children who were consulted indicate their interest in play 

environments: 

“A pool, bigger parks, more playgrounds for schools” 

“a bigger park at Jakovich, a bigger park at Atwell, soccer goals, better space to have a 

trampoline” 

“make more play areas for children, swimming pool for hot summers” 

“I would like a bigger playground and some shade over them” 

Strategy 14 

Provision of a regional playground in the south eastern region of Cockburn, based 

on inclusive and accessible best practice. 

Strategy 15 

To ensure best practice and universal design, a Policy needs to be developed to 

guide collaborative Council process across all areas, in Playground planning, design 

and development. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Early Years 

Local government and service provider stakeholders advised that an additional site for 

the City’s Early Years Program in the south east corridor is needed and would 

complement the current child health services there. As mentioned previously under 6.1, 

the Early Years Program plays a key role in providing intermediary programs and home 

visits while children are on the waitlist for services from Southwell Child Development 

Centre, and as waitlists extend so the need grows for additional Early Years staff. 

Currently the two part time staff (totalling 1 full time equivalent), located at Coolbellup 

but covering the whole of the City, have a heavy case load of 40 families. Recognising 

the increased demand, the Department for Child Protection would be open to discussion 

about funding opportunities through their Best Beginnings program. Discussions should 

be sought with the funding body for Early Years, the Department for Communities, 

however this Department is currently reviewing all parenting support services in WA, 

which means uncertainty for Early Years funding until the review outcomes are released 

in September 2010. 

Strategy 16 

Establish additional site for the Early Years program to better service the south 

east part of the City. Source increased funding for Early Years Program staffing to 

provide the additional provision of services to a rapidly growing population and 

level of need. 

Strategy 17 

Continue close liaison with Department for Communities and Department for Child 

Protection regarding the City’s parenting support services. Liaise closely with 

relevant stakeholders to ensure that the City’s needs are well known for future 

Departmental funding considerations. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

In Home Care 

The City’s In Home Care program (federal funding) is the only service with a capping 

limit – currently capped at 65 Equivalent Full Time. This program is always in 

demand, and the City is seeking an increase such that the growth of the service can 

meet expressed community need, including for families with fly in/fly out workers. 

Strategy 18 

Make application as appropriate for increased places for In Home Care from the 

federal government. 

Playgroups 

Playgroups are an avenue for parents and children from age 0 – 3yrs to be engaged in 

early learning and socialising programs. These play a key role in children’s early 

development and in linking parents into appropriate services as well as building social 

networks. Playgroups tend to function fairly independently but there are benefits in 

creating more links for the purposes of funding, community skill training, collaborative 

events, venue accessibility etc. It would be useful to include Playgroups in any strategies 

looking at service provision for young children prior to formal schooling. 

Playgroups across the City are supported by a part time Children’s Services officer and 

include initiatives to provide playgroups for Indigenous families. Past efforts running 

Aboriginal Playgroups have been significant but not sustainable, in part due to the need 

to repeatedly seek funding each year, and also due to the lack of a sustainable model 

that is less resource intensive. The Department for Child Protection has indicated that it 

will support proactive responses to marginalised communities through playgroups eg; 

addressing Indigenous family needs, or for teen mothers. Playgroup WA indicated that it 

would support the establishment of an inter‐generational playgroup in the region. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Strategy 19 

Work with State Government Departments and other organisations to obtain 

funding and support for the provision of playgroups for marginalised communities 

(eg Indigenous parents, young mothers), and for other groups such as Inter‐ 

generational or grandparents. 

Strategy 20 

Investigate and develop strategies for a more cohesive approach in managing 

playgroups across the city in order to enhance the viability and provision of this 

important service. 

Family Day Care (FDC) 

The City’s Family Day Care co‐ordination unit provides support, training and monitoring 

for FDC providers who are members of the Scheme. Proposed Commonwealth Policy 

and Regulation changes will be far reaching and will require significant change. 

Strategy 21 

Ensure the Family Day Care Scheme maintains knowledge of the proposed changes 

to licensing and regulations, and places itself in a position to transition these 

changes. 

Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) 

Future needs are for support workers with expertise in caring for children with a 

disability, including three year olds who miss out on mainstream services. 

New regulations are being implemented in January 2012, including requirements for 

supervisors and their qualifications. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Strategy 22 

As part of the Workforce Plan for OSHC services, identify skills, needs and solutions 

for support workers to care for children with a disability. 

Long Day Care 

The Department for Communities advised that currently in Cockburn there are sufficient 

child care centres available for use by local families. See the attached listing of Cockburn 

long day care centres in Attachment 4. 

Three Year Old Programs (prior to school) 

A number of semi‐structured programs have developed for three year old children over 

the past few years. They are usually based on two different models: 

• The 3 year old Playclub model is attended by a parent and their 3 year old child 

together, with the focus on developmental and interactive activities as stepping 

stones to kindy in the following year. The group is led by a qualified Playleader. 

• The Pre‐Kindy model provides a program for 3 year old children to attend 

without parents, led by a qualified teacher/leader. These are usually delivered by 

private, for‐profit organisations or businesses, although some schools (usually 

not state govt schools) are experimenting with providing services for this age 

group. 

One of the difficulties for the above programs is access to local government 

infrastructure, eg lack of easy access to halls which could be used by a private pre‐ 

kindergarten organisation or a service which offers access for families where there is a 

child with a disability, where access to services is not always available. Other 

infrastructure needs are at Atwell Community Centre where the multipurpose room is 

small and storage is tight. Groups who cater for young children are moving out of the 

Atwell Community Centre as there are now charges for storage, not just room hire. There 

is some concern that these groups will be ‘unlinked’ into the City’s young families 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

support network, which challenges the national move towards integrated service 

delivery. 

Strategy 23 

Investigate options for pre‐kindy and 3 year old programs in order to enhance the 

provision of services to children prior to attending formal schooling. 

Libraries 

Parents advised that, unlike other libraries across the City, the Success library is not able 

to run as many activities or meet the needs of the relatively high numbers of families in 

the area, as the space available is quite small. This will change with the development of 

a new library venue as part of the Integrated Health and Community Services Facility. 

Strategy 24 

Include provision for publicly accessible spaces for services for children in the City’s 

infrastructure plan. These include the Success Library upgrade, the provision of 

office space for Cockburn Early Years Program in the planned Integrated Health 

and Community Services Facility, and the availability of community venues in the 

Success and Aubin Grove areas. 

Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds 

Children from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are an identified 

needs group. Families are supported in the City through the Worldly Wise Women’s 

Group – this has referred parents to the Early Years program for support and advice. 

However, the Fremantle Multicultural Centre advised that refugee families and other 

culturally and linguistically diverse groups can be isolated, socially and physically (lack of 

transport) and there is an ongoing need for increased awareness of this by all Children’s 

Services staff. Programs need to have crèche facilities to attract these parents as they 

lack the family/local social supports for informal childcare. A Council program for 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

families from CALD backgrounds was run in 2007/08, however this was only a limited 

grant which didn’t allow for continuation of the project. 

There is a high level of need in the region, which points to the necessity for a Council‐ 

funded program officer to oversee this area of need and support any initiatives. 

Strategy 25 

Establish program officer position at Council to address the needs of families from 

culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds across the City. 

Aboriginal children and families 

The City’s Aboriginal Reference Group (ARG) identified gaps in services for children, 

including those aged 6‐12 years of age. 

The City has previously accessed single year funding for Indigenous parent & child 

programs over three successive years. However the state funding for this program has 

ceased despite this being a needed service. Increased access to homework programs 

and other educational support activities were sought by the Aboriginal Reference Group, 

together with increased access to Youth Centre activities and services. 

The Group also noted that where possible, Indigenous staff had an increased likelihood 

of connection with and responsiveness from young mothers and young people. This has 

been corroborated by Child Health nurses who worked with young Indigenous mothers. 

The stated needs indicate that an additional part time Indigenous Early Years staff 

member is required to augment current staffing in the Cockburn Early Years Program. 

This program is working to capacity at the moment with just 1 full time position shared 

by two staff, to cover all of Cockburn. 

An increased presence of Aboriginal staff in service provision across Council is an issue 

that will be raised as part of a second Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) for the City of 

Cockburn. The inaugural RAP, due to cover the period of 2011 – 2012, is currently in 

process and will be finished by December 2010. This first RAP will work on building and 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

strengthening relationships between Council and the Aboriginal community, and 

amongst the community at large. It aims to put strategies in place to raising awareness 

of Indigenous needs and to assist us to move forward together. This will include training 

for staff in Aboriginal Cultural Awareness. One of the key goals for RAP’s is working on 

strategies that will assist in ‘closing the gap’ in terms of life expectancy differences 

between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people. This will raise issues around health 

services, education, housing, employment and other key areas. 

Any additional funding would be well placed to work with Aboriginal families and 

children across Cockburn, particularly in light of the evidence which shows that 

Aboriginal children often have less early preparation for formal schooling, with a higher 

proportion needing support for developmental and learning delays. City of Cockburn’s 

Early Years Program offers home‐visiting with families, and groups for parents and 

children which directly work with developmental delays, behavioural issues and 

parenting concerns. 

Strategy 26 

Liaise with the Fremantle/Peel Regional Education Office to monitor establishment 

and use of homework programs by Indigenous young people. 

Strategy 27 

Investigate funding possibilities for the establishment of an additional position 

within the Early Years Program, specifically addressing the needs of Aboriginal 

families and the development of strategies and programs. 

Strategy 28 

Investigate and monitor use of the Cockburn Youth Centre by Indigenous young 

people and identify any barriers that may influence a lack of engagement with 

services and programs. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Service gaps identified by the Aboriginal Reference Group and by service providers were 

supports for families particularly in Hamilton Hill, Coolbellup, Yangebup and Beeliar. It is 

noted that the ‘My Time’ group for Aboriginal parents, funded through Ngala, and lead 

by Cockburn’s Family Support, Early Years and Aboriginal Community Development 

positions, has now started. ‘Noongar Rangers’ is also being run by Beeliar and South 

Lake Primary schools for primary aged children. 

Strategy 29 

Continue to work with the Aboriginal Reference Group and through the avenue of 

Council’s Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP), to monitor service provision and 

emerging needs. Liaise with funding stakeholders to explore funding opportunities, 

other than those already mentioned. 

Children with a disability 

The Disability Reference Group (DRG) identified after school and vacation care access as 

a key need for children in the region. Currently barriers to access reflect the need for 

carer/support for children with a disability, and the lack of a broader range of choices, as 

well as transport to and from activities. The City was unfortunately unsuccessful with a 

funding proposal to the Disability Services Commission for a vacation care program for 

children with a disability. This therefore still leaves a gap in this area until further 

funding can be sought. The City’s Early Years program also supports some of these 

families/children, particularly younger ones prior to any diagnosis, or who have a 

developmental delay. However there is clearly a need for additional resources in OSHC 

for support workers for children with a disability attending their programs and activities. 

Strategy 30 

Continue to source and apply for funding for training and provision of additional 

resources in OSHC for support workers for children with a disability. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Stakeholders identified that the removal of the Education Department’s Fremantle/Peel 

region’s Disability Officer position in response to budget changes would result in a lack 

of support for children requiring support in schools, eg; Success Primary School now 

need to seek external funding for two children with high support needs to attend the 

school camp. 

Both Council’s Disability Reference Group and Aboriginal Reference Group noted that 

the coordinated action by Education Department, City of Cockburn and other 

government services are key to successful outcomes for children they represent. 

Strategy 31 

Continue liaison and networking with the Education Department, in particular 

through the School and Council Liaison Meetings, to monitor supports for 

Indigenous children and children with a disability and their families, and identify 

opportunities for joint action to reduce service gaps. 

6.4 THE IMPACT OF CHANGING POLICIES AND EMERGING TRENDS 

The detail of new policies and frameworks identified in PART 4 provides a complex web 

of priority setting, eligibility requirements and service delivery changes emerging over 

the next few years which will need to be synthesized and implemented by the City’s 

services working with children and families. 

It has been suggested by state government officers that the City needs to identify how it 

will frame the integration of children’s services with other services to provide a ‘no 

wrong door’ service delivery, as well as take advantage of the wealth of funding 

available through the national policy and funding agendas which reflect such service 

delivery. 

It is suggested that the Human Services Team work with other relevant City officers and 

other relevant stakeholders to develop a business case for childcare services across the 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

City in the new policy environment, and use this package to drive change and access 

funding to further the new national agendas. 

Strategy 32 

Childcare Services Team reviews the Situation Analysis report in PART 4, analyses 

future funding and program requirements, and identifies any required changes in a 

Business Plan. 

Children’s Development 

The limited funded hours of the current Council‐funded Children’s Development 

position means staff have insufficient capacity to liaise properly with playgroups, schools 

and other early years community groups. 

This liaison is vital to assessing changing needs in the community and developing new 

networking or partnership opportunities for the delivery of programs. 

Stronger liaison is essential for effective promotion of Council services, activities and 

events, and also for the identification of issues, concerns or gaps in service provision. 

As can be seen in all the previous points, there are increasing population and policy 

complexities facing all of the Childcare and Children’s Services programs. There is a 

requirement for resources to address these service needs and service complexities. 

Strategy 33 

Increase key resources needed to coordinate services to meet children’s needs 

across the City, specifically additional staffing for children’s community 

development and for policy development & coordination. 

The example of the integrated framework implemented through the Kwinana Industries 

Council (KIC) has been suggested by state government stakeholders as a model to 

consider as part of the Children’s Services business planning. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

The KIC is almost unique in Australia and pursues its goals through the sponsorship of a 

range of committees set up to provide input on a range of issues of common interest. 

The output from the various committee activities is then used as the basis for 

communication to the KIC's stakeholders so that Kwinana industry is seen as speaking 

with one voice. 

In terms of children’s services, this model would promote an integrated approach to 

service users as well as successfully accessing substantial funding from federal and state 

sources. 

Such an approach reflects not only physical infrastructure eg the new Coolbellup Hub, 

but also high level liaison, coordination and cooperation between service providers 

working in the region. 

Strategy 34 

Human Services Team to evaluate the benefits and adoption of an integrated 

framework approach and the relevance of various models for service delivery in 

Cockburn. 

This will take resources as well as skills eg; early childhood education, and 

education/training for existing (around 40 people in part time and full time positions) 

and new staff. 

The City’s participation in the local Early Years Network (South West Early Years Metro 

Interest Group, SWEYMIG) is a key two‐way communication strategy to assist in 

understanding and responding to changes as they occur in this present fluid state of 

major policy implementation. 

It is also a means of keeping abreast with and analysing the impacts of policy changes on 

the City’s services and future needs. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

State government stakeholders see that the City will need to respond effectively to the 

new regulations and quality assurance processes for all children’s services as of July 

2010, for implementation in 2012. 

Strategy 35 

Representatives from the City’s Human Services team to continue participation in 

the region’s Early Years Network (SWEYMIG) meetings. 

The Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) services delivered by the City meet licensing 

requirements and have received high quality accreditation status for all 5 OSHC centres. 

There may be further requirements for staffing resources and professional 

development/ training in order to keep abreast with changing national and state policy 

frameworks. 

In 2012 regulatory responsibility will transfer from the state to the federal government, 

resulting in some uncertainties regarding changes. 

Currently the City maintains five services across the region, however while there are 

increasing needs for Out of School Hours Care services in Coolbellup and Hammond 

Park, it will be necessary to review and rationalise the services which the City can 

provide with its current structure and resources. 

Issues impacting on staffing numbers for Children’s Services include: 

• Reflecting the relatively informal arrangements in the past, 98% of OSHC staff are 

casuals. There is a need to be able to change this to retain quality staff to meet 

future statutory requirements 

• The private sector are moving into OSHC, e.g. OSH Club, Camp Australia (based in the 

Eastern States). As with all OSHC Centres, the private for‐profit OSHC will be funded 

by parent fees and the CCB entitlements of parents. Additionally the private centres 

will set fees to enable profit as opposed to the existing not‐for‐profit status of the 

City’s OSHC Centres. Impact on the City may be less availability of staff as the 

private sector staff are paid higher wages than the City’s OSHC staff 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

• There is a pay differential between private and the City’s services (currently the City 

pays above award) in the child care area. 

Strategy 36 

Identify staffing changes and professional development & training required to 

meet the new regulatory framework and include these in the Children’s Services 

Workforce Plan. 

With a possible future role for the Education Department in hosting or providing out of 

school hours care (and thus ameliorating transport issues for children), there is a need 

for close on‐going liaison with the Fremantle‐Peel District Education Office. 

This Office advised that it anticipates that the first out of school hours care service could 

be provided from the Education Department within two years. 

Strategy 37 

Continue close liaison with the Fremantle/Peel District Education Office regarding 

out of school hours care provision by Education Department schools. 

Family Day Care (FDC) offer services for children aged 0 – 12 years of age, however 

predominantly children are aged 0 ‐5 years of age. 

The highest need for this service is in Aubin Grove. Currently there are 2 possible FDC 

Licenses – one for children aged from baby to the end of primary school and the other 

for children attending kindergarten to age 15 years. Whilst there have been a number 

of applications for ‘school aged’ FDC, all current FDC Providers operating with the City 

hold the standard FDC Licence ( 0 – 12 years). The City’s FDC Scheme is seeking 

applicants for school‐aged FDC particularly in Atwell, Harvest Lakes, Aubin Grove and 

other newly developing areas. 

The City’s FDC Scheme role is to: 

• Recruit and select FDC providers, 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

• support providers through licensing, 

• train and resource providers while ensuring provider compliance with State 

Regulations and National Quality Assurance standards of childcare provision 

• administer the Parents Centrelink/ DEEWR CCB payments to Providers 

• support Parents 

• manage childcare referrals and child development issues 

• maintain quality selection, support, training and other processes. 

The service currently operates under diminishing Commonwealth Operational Subsidies. 

Given the reduction in funding and complexity of the role a business plan needs to be 

developed with consideration given to the reduced resources available. 

Family Day Care should work together with the rest of the Childcare Services Team 

(OSHC and In‐Home care) to develop a Business Plan to address resource and funding 

needs, and policy changes and requirements (refer to Strategy 32). 

One of the emerging trends is the appointment in 2007 of WA’s first Commissioner for 

Children and Young People. This independent position was created because the West 

Australian Parliament made a commitment to the children and young people of WA that 

they would live in a state where they were heard, valued, healthy and safe. The 

Commissioner for Children and Young people Act was passed in 2006, and 

emphasises the fact that the Commissioner must advocate for all children and young 

people in the state, giving special regard to Aboriginal children and young people and 

children and young people who are vulnerable or disadvantaged for any reason. 

In July 2010 the Commissioner urged Local Government to include children and young 

people in its planning and development processes and to ensure they have a voice. 

“Local government is the level of government closest to the community, which gives it 

unique access to identifying and responding to community needs. It is at the forefront of 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

delivering services and programs to children and young people, and planning urban 

environments where children can grow and thrive.” 

The Commissioner recommended that Local Government Authorities consult with 

children and families to ensure they take a child‐friendly approach to urban planning and 

create developmentally rich play opportunities for children. 

Children and young people aged approximately 6 – 12 years were consulted as part of 

the development of this Children’s Services Plan. It is recommended that this process of 

consultation continues and is built into Council’s development and planning policies and 

practice. One of the most effective ways for doing this is through the establishment of a 

Children’s Reference Group, similar to the Youth Advisory Group which has been in 

operation for a number of years at City of Cockburn. These two groups could work 

closely together to encourage mentoring, collaboration and a flow‐on from one to the 

next as people move through the age group. 

Strategy 38 

Develop policy and strategies for meaningful inclusion and consultation with 

children on key Council issues and development, wherever possible. 

Strategy 39 

Research and develop a Children’s Reference Group that will liaise between 

children in the Cockburn community and Council, providing a voice for children and 

an avenue for meaningful participation & consultation. 

Strategy 40 

Provide opportunity for the proposed Children’s Reference Group to collaborate 

with Council’s Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) in a variety of ways for the benefit 

of both groups. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Strategy 41 

Ensure the development of knowledge and skills for children participating in either 

the Children’s Reference Group or other forms of consultation to enable full 

participation. 

Summary of Gap and Needs Analysis 

The previous ten year Plan, ‘Future Directions for Children’s Services Plan 2001 to 2010’, 

identified a wide range of strategies to expand and improve Children’s Services across the 

City. 

Achievements over the last ten years (Attachment 9) have been impressive and have 

increased the diversity of programs and services offered to families and children in the City 

of Cockburn. 

This five year plan identifies a complex and changing policy environment and demographic 

challenges for the City’s Children’s Services. 

Outcomes and Strategies in the next section detail a strategic framework for the 

recommended strategies. 

Finally it is crucial to develop ongoing mechanisms to consult with children and ensure that 

they have the ability to fully participate in issues that impact on their lives. The City 

currently has a Youth Advisory Council that should continue to meet the older age groups 

needs. However, the City also needs to form a children’s reference group to enable ongoing 

consultation with children on key issues. 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

PART 7 OUTCOMES AND STRATEGIES 

OUTCOME 

7.1 

Strategic 

Plan 

area/s 

ChildFriendly Outdoor Spaces and Buildings 

That children in the City of Cockburn have access to best practice 

child & family friendly planned environments that support healthy 

child development, quality of life and inclusion for all. 

Infrastructure Development; Natural Environmental Management 

Strategy Time Line Resource Estimate 

5 The City’s officers responsible for children’s services 

and for sport and recreation work on implementing the 

strategies for expanding sports clubs as per the City’s 

current Sport and Recreation Strategic Plan. 

7 The City investigates relevant initiatives, including 

working in partnership with other organisations where 

relevant, in the provision of interventions and safe active 

recreation activities for children and young people, in 

popular parks and public open spaces. 

8 The City’s officers responsible for youth, 

sport/recreation and planning/infrastructure work in 

conjunction to provide optimal public sports facilities, 

and successful access of target groups to these facilities, 

in order to address the needs of different age, gender 

and specific user groups, eg scooter, skateboard. 

14 Provision of a regional playground in the south 

eastern region of Cockburn, based on inclusive and 

accessible best practice. 

15 To ensure best practice and universal design, a Policy 

needs to be developed to guide collaborative Council 

process across all areas, in Playground planning, design 

and development. 

24 Include provision for publicly accessible spaces for 

services for children in the City’s infrastructure plan. 

These include the Success Library upgrade, the provision 

2011 

2015 


2014 

2012 

2014 

Existing 

Existing 

Existing 

Municipal‐ to be 

costed. $100,000 

to develop concept 

plan and quantity 

surveyor report 

Existing 

Municipal‐ to be 

costed as part of 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

of office space for Cockburn Early Years Program in the 

planned Integrated Health and Community Services 

Facility, and the availability of community venues in the 

Success and Aubin Grove areas. 

OUTCOME 

7.2 



area/s 

Social Participation 

overall building 

development 

quantity surveyor 

cost estimate 

That children aged 012 years in the City of Cockburn have 

affordable and equitable access to activities and events that support 

social participation and foster well being and social integration. 

Lifestyle and Aspiration Achievement; Transport Optimisation 


6 The City’s officers responsible for children’s services, 

youth and for sport/recreation work together to 

investigate and support the provision of innovative 

models for ‘non‐sporting’ activities for children in the 

City. Provision of a database of existing activities be 

made available to parents and service providers, via 

varied means such as City website, Co‐Info and others. 

20 Investigate and develop strategies for a more 

cohesive approach in managing playgroups across the 

city in order to enhance the viability and provision of 

this important service. 

28 Investigate and monitor use of the Cockburn Youth 

Centre by Indigenous young people and identify any 

barriers that may influence a lack of engagement with 

services and programs. 

OUTCOME 

7.3 


Plan area 

2013 

2012 


Respect and Inclusion 

Municipal Increase 

0.2 FTE Children’s 

Development 

position to 0.6 FTE 

Existing 

Existing 

That children in the City of Cockburn are recognised, included and 

encouraged to participate as valuable members in the social, civic 

and economic life of the city. 

Lifestyle and Aspiration Achievement 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 


38 Develop policy and strategies for meaningful 

inclusion and consultation with children on key Council 

issues and development, wherever possible 

39 Research and develop a Children’s Reference Group 

that will liaise between children in the Cockburn 

community and Council, providing a voice for children 

and an avenue for meaningful participation & 

consultation. 

40 Provide opportunity for the proposed Children’s 

Reference Group to collaborate with Council’s Youth 

Advisory Committee (YAC) in a variety of ways for the 

benefit of both groups 

41 Ensure the development of knowledge and skills for 

children participating in either the Children’s Reference 

Group or other forms of consultation to enable full 

participation. 

OUTCOME 

7.4 



area/s 

2012 

2012 

2012 

2012 

Communication and Information 



Development 




Development 


& $2000 /PA for 

operational costs 

Existing 

Municipal $2000 

per annum 

That relevant information is readily accessible to children and families 

regarding current services, activities, and events. City of Cockburn staff and 

Children’s service providers keep informed of changing policies and trends 

regarding children and families, both nationally and locally. 

Lifestyle and Aspiration Achievement; Governance Excellence 


10 Review and refine early years & early childhood 

programs, to be consistent with new federal and state 

funding frameworks. 

21 Ensure the Family Day Care Scheme maintains 

knowledge of the proposed changes to licensing and 

2011 

2011 

Existing 

Existing 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

regulations, and place itself in a position to transition 

these changes. 

32 Childcare Services Team reviews the Situation 

Analysis report in Part 4, analyses future funding and 

program requirements, and identifies any required 

changes in a business plan. 

35 Representatives from the City’s Human Services 

team to continue participation in the region’s Early 

Years Network (SWEYMIG) meetings. 

36 Identify staffing changes and professional 

development & training required to meet the new 

regulatory framework and include these in the 

Children’s Services Workforce Plan. 

37 Continue close liaison with the Fremantle/Peel 

District Education Office regarding out of school hours 

care provision by Education Department schools. 

OUTCOME 

7.5 



area/s 

2012 


2012 


Existing 

Existing 

Existing 

Existing 

Access to Community and Health Services 

That children and their parents/ caregivers in the City of Cockburn are able 

to access affordable, inclusive, and quality community support and health 

services. Access includes cost, transport, availability of services, and 

physical/social access issues. 

Lifestyle and Aspiration Achievement; Transport Optimisation 


1 Continue gathering data and evidence of 

disadvantage for children in the early years who cannot 

access allied health services within an appropriate 

timeframe. Advocate to the relevant bodies for 

increased resources to better meet the needs of this 

significant gap in service 

2 Advocate to the state government for expansion of 

immunisation services across the Cockburn region. 


2011 

Existing 

Venue Hire subsidy 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

4 Promote the availability of Youth Centre fees being 

waivered for young people where they are at‐risk and 

suffering financial hardship. 

9 The City investigates cross‐City transport options, 

including the provision of a City bus service 

13 Continue to maintain the partnership with the 

Department of Health for provision of child health 

services across the City. Advocate for the expansion of 

services as needs are identified. 

18 Make application as appropriate for increased 

places for In Home Care from the federal government. 

19 Work with State Government Departments and 

other organisations to obtain funding for the provision 

of playgroups for marginalised communities (eg 

Indigenous parents, young mothers), and for other 

groups such as Intergenerational and grandparents. 

22 As part of the Workforce Plan for OSHC services, 

identify skills, needs and solutions for support workers 

to care for children with a disability. 

25 Establish program officer position at Council to 

address the needs of families from culturally and 

linguistically diverse backgrounds across the City. 

27 Investigate funding possibilities for the 

establishment of an additional position within the Early 

Years Program, specifically addressing the needs of 

Aboriginal families and the development of strategies 

and programs. 

30 Continue to source and apply for funding for 

training and provision of additional resources in OSHC 

for support workers for children with a disability. 

31 Continue liaison and networking with the Education 

Department, in particular through the School and 

Council Liaison Meetings, to monitor supports for 

Indigenous children and children with a disability and 

their families, and identify opportunities for joint 

2010/11 

2010/11 

2011 

2012 

2012 

2011 

2013/14 

2012 


2013 

Existing 

Existing 

To be costed if new 

service is identified 

Existing 

Existing 

Existing 

Municipal 0.6 FTE 

Existing 

Existing 

Existing 




__________________________________________________________________________________ 

action to reduce service gaps. 

34 Human Services Team to evaluate the benefits and 

adoption of an integrated framework approach and the 

relevance of various models for service delivery in 


OUTCOME 

7.6 



area/s 

July 2010 PAGE 65 

2012 

Existing 

Responding to the emerging needs of Children and Families 

The City facilitates and/or develops new programs and services in response 

to the identified needs of children and parents/caregivers, with due 

consideration for the City’s changing demographics and population growth. 

Lifestyle and Aspiration Achievement; Demographic Planning 


3 The City’s Human Services Team and the Youth 

Services Team to review services for children aged 7‐9 

years of age on a six monthly basis, identifying any 

emerging gaps and opportunities for service provision. 

A ‘report card’ to be developed and provided on a six 

monthly basis, to promote the needs and interests of 

children from this age group living in the City. 

11 Identify and facilitate innovative new programs to 

meet needs gaps across the City eg; intergenerational, 

families with a parent in incarceration, fly‐in/fly‐out 

families. 

12 Continue to maintain and strengthen partnerships 

with the Department for Child Protection to develop 

new and/or expanded programs for families and 

children. 

16 Establish additional site for the Early Years program 

to better service the south east part of the City. Source 

increased funding for Early Years Program staffing to 

provide the additional provision of services to a rapidly 

growing population and level of need. 

2011 


2011 

2016 

Existing 



Development 


Existing 

Grant Funding



__________________________________________________________________________________ 

23 Investigate options for pre‐kindy and 3 year old 

programs in order to enhance the provision of services 

to children prior to attending formal schooling. 

2013 Existing 

26 Liaise with the Fremantle/Peel Regional Education 

Office to monitor establishment and use of homework 

programs by Indigenous young people. 

29 Continue to work with the Aboriginal Reference 

Group and through the avenue of Council’s 

Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP), to monitor service 

provision and emerging needs. Liaise with funding 

stakeholders to explore funding opportunities, other 

than those already mentioned. 

33 Increase key resources needed to coordinate 

services to meet children’s needs across the City, 

specifically additional staffing for children’s community 

development and for policy development & 

coordination. 

July 2010 PAGE 66 

2011 

2011 

2011/12 

Existing 

Grant funding & 

Municipal funding 

Municipal‐ 

Increase 0.2 FTE 

Children’s 

Development 

position to 0.6 FTE

ATTACHMENT 1 

City of Cockburn 

Children’s Services Strategic Plan 

Consultancy Brief 

Submissions are sought from suitably qualified and experienced firms or individuals 

to review the current City of Cockburn’s Children’s Services Plan. 

The revised Plan will outline current services in the Cockburn region for children 

aged 0 – 12years, and identify needs and future services required to support and 

enhance the developmental wellbeing of children across the City. 

THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIES WILL BE EMPLOYED TO ACHIEVE THE OVERALL 

OBJECTIVE: 

1. Update and review information on currently available community 

services for children aged 0 - 12yrs and their parents/carers in the 

Cockburn District. 

2. Conduct consultation/s with both the broader community and service 

providers, and provide demographic analysis, to identify current and 

future needs for children and parents/carers in the Cockburn District. 

3. Develop recommendations and a Forward Plan outlining the required 

type and location of future services for children and parents/carers over 

the next 5 year period. 

Evaluation Criteria 

Assessment of submissions will be based upon the following evaluation criteria: 

• Demonstrated broad-based multi-disciplinary research and consultation 

expertise of the team or individuals in fields including children’s services, 

social and/or town planning. . 25% 

• Appropriate and adequate resources to carry out the study. 10% 

• An outline of the methodology, demonstrating an appreciation of the task 25% 

• Indicative timetable for the various stages and tasks which shall result in the 

project being completed no later than March 31 st , 2010 10% 

• Cost 30%

Budget 

The total budget available for this study is in the vicinity of $10,000. 

Closing Date 

Submissions must be received by no later than WEDNESDAY 4 TH NOVEMBER 2009 

Background 

The City of Cockburn is a Perth Metropolitan Council located approximately 20 

kilometres south of the Perth CBD. 

It currently has a population of approximately 85 000 residents (Australian Bureau of 

Statistics(ABS) Regional Population Growth 2007-2008). The ABS Regional 

Population Growth Report lists Cockburn as one of 5 Local Government Areas out of 

30 in the Perth Statistical Division with the largest population growth during 2007 to 

2008, growing by more than 3000 people in this period (ABS Regional Population 

Growth 2007-2008). 

Within City of Cockburn there were 13 849 children aged between 0 and 12 years in 

2006 which represents almost one fifth (19%) of the Cockburn population (ABS 2006 

Census). The overall population is expected to grow to 102 600 by 2016 and the 

number of children aged 0-12 years is expected to grow to approximately 14 640 by 

this year (Western Australia Tomorrow report, Western Australian Planning 

Commission, May 2009, p41). 

The City of Cockburn has a commitment to facilitating the provision of facilities and 

services for children within the 0 – 12 years age group and their parents/carers across 

the Cockburn area. It is acknowledged that extensive planning and needs analysis is 

required with respect to the provision of a range of services, events and facilities for 

young children and their parents/carers in the Cockburn District. 

Project Strategies: 

1. Update and Review information on currently available services and facilities 

for children aged 0 – 12 years in the Cockburn District. 

1.1. Review City of Cockburn’s current Children Services Plan ‘Our Children, 

Our Future; a Ten Year Plan’ (May 2001)

1.2. Incorporate the updated information on current services and facilities as 

provided by the City of Cockburn. Please note there is no requirement for 

mapping of current services and facilities. 

A preliminary report of current services and facilities will be provided to the 

Working Group on completion of Strategy 1. 

2. Conduct a community consultation, demographic analysis, and current 

service provision analysis, to identify current and future needs for Children 

and their Families in the Cockburn District. 

2.1. The following will need to be collated and analysed: 

• Consultation with children, parents/caregivers and service providers 

located within the City of Cockburn via a variety of methods and 

formats to ensure accessibility 

• Demographics of the District and its population growth potential. 

• Assess whether current services are appropriate and accessible to 

children, parents and caregivers (eg; ease of contact, location, cost or 

transport provided) 

• Availability of information to the community 

• Identification of current demand and anticipate future needs in service 

and facility provision. 

Note: Significant attention must be paid to the following: 

Consultation with the City's Children’s Services, Childcare services, Support 

Services Team, and other relevant organisations providing services to parents, 

children and families. 

A summary of the findings from the consultation will be provided to the 

working group on completion of Strategy 2. 

3. Develop Recommendations and a Forward Plan outlining the required type 

and location of future services and facilities for children aged 0 – 12yrs in the 

City of Cockburn, over the next 5 year period.

3.1 A review of the capacity of the current children and family services, and 

facilities within the City to meet the needs of children over the next 5 year 

period. 

3.2 Identify children and family services, and facilities, including appropriate 

localities that will need to be provided over the next 5 years. 

3.3 Review the impact of current and proposed Commonwealth or State 

children’s services policies and trends e.g. COAG’s National Early 

Childhood Development Strategy, for planning purposes. 

3.4 Formulate evidence-based recommendations regarding the type and location 

of future services and facilities for children and families in the district over 

the next 5 year period. 

On completion of the final strategy, the final report outlining the findings, 

recommendations, and supporting documentation will be provided to the working 

group. 

The City will provide the consultant with the following: 

• Demographics of the Cockburn District and its population growth potential 

• Information about the City’s in-house services and facilities and those 

planned in the future 

• Information on sites in the Cockburn District which have been set aside for 

a range of community purposes 

• Other relevant planning information 

• An electronic copy of the City of Cockburn’s ‘Our Children, Our Future; a 

Ten Year Plan’ (May 2001) 

• A copy of Council’s Corporate Strategic Plan, and its Sustainability 

Framework. 

Performance Indicators 

• Extent of consultation with children and their parents/carers across City of 

Cockburn

• Extent of consultation with the City’s Children’s Services, Childcare 

Services and Support Services Team, and other relevant organisations or 

community groups providing services to children and parents/carers living 

in Cockburn 

• Identification and analysis of current and future needs for children and 

families 

• The extent of identification and analysis of service provision gaps 

• The extent to which the reports provided, including the final report, are 

concise and readily understandable 

• The extent to which the consultation reports are relevant and applicable to 

the needs identified specifically in the City of Cockburn 

• The extent to which the report links with Commonwealth or State 

children’s services policies and current trends; e.g. COAG’s National 

Early Childhood Development Strategy; to City of Cockburn’s proposed 

Children’s and Families Policy; and to any other relevant Policies or Plans 

• Effective match between the analysis of needs with the recommendations 

for future services and facilities 

Supervision 

The successful applicant will liaise with an ‘in house’ working group made up of 

Family Services and Human Services staff, and will be under the ultimate direction of 

the City of Cockburn’s Manager of Human Services. 

Payment Schedule 

• Appointment of successful applicant 10% of the total fee 

• Completion of Strategy 1 (by Dec 18 th 2009) 10% of the total fee 

• Completion of Strategy 2 (by end Feb 2010) 20% of the total fee 

• Completion of Strategy 3 and Final Report, 

subject to the achievement of the relevant 

performance indicators (by March 31 st 2010) 60% of the total fee

Outputs 

Enquiries 

• Effective ongoing communication with the City throughout the 

consultancy 

• Preliminary report on current services and facilities on completion of 

Strategy 1 

• Preliminary report on completion of Strategy 2 regarding the consultation 

and needs analysis 

• First Draft report to be provided in digital format and one unbound hard 

copy for replication 

• Final Report to be provided in digital format, one bound copy and one 

unbound hard copy. 

Direct all enquiries to Barbara Freeman at the City of Cockburn on 9411 3459 or 

barbara@cockburn.wa.gov.au 

Submissions 

To be considered, submissions must address the assessment criteria. Applicants may 

provide other information if they consider it will assist in the evaluation of their 

submission. 

Submissions must be received by no later than Wednesday 4 th 

November 2009 and should be addressed to: 

Ms Gail Bowman 

Manager Human Services 

City of Cockburn 

PO Box 1215 

BIBRA LAKE WA 6965

- City of Cockburn forecast (forecast.id®) http://forecast.id.com.au/Default.aspx?id=349&gid=10&pg=30201 

Population forecasts 

What are the key results? 

Select an area 

What are our 

assumptions? 

How many will live here? 

How old will we be? 

How will we live? 

How did we do the 

forecasts? 

Map of City of Cockburn 

Reports 

Site and data info 

Staff access 


Key age specific results 

0 to 4 year olds 5 to 11 year olds 55 to 74 year olds 75 years and over 

0-4 years: The 

maps and table 

show the proportion 

of 0-4 year olds in 

all small areas of 

the City of Cockburn 

and the forecast 

change in the 

number between 

2006 and 2021. The 

most significant 

concentrations of 

pre-schoolers were 

in the small areas of 

Atwell, Beeliar and 

Success. These are 

areas that have 

experienced recent 

residential 

development, 

providing housing 

opportunities for 

younger families. By 

contrast, the areas 

Children aged 0 to 4 years 

2021 (numbers) 

Numbers on the map 

correspond to the 

small area names in 

the table below. Click 

an area on the map 

to view its name. 

with the smallest share of this age group tend to be those that have a more mature age 

structure or that attract mature families, such as Leeming, Munster and Spearwood. 

Print page 

Change the map data 

By 2021, most areas are expected to experience an increase in the number of pre-schoolers 

with the small areas of Hammond Park-Wattleup-Henderson, Aubin Grove-Banjup and Success 

gaining the most in this age group. These are areas with future greenfield development 

opportunities expected to prove attractive to young families as they develop. By contrast, 

Atwell, as a recently developed suburb, with little future development opportunity, is expected 

to experience a modest decrease in pre-schoolers as the area ages over the forecast period. 

Children aged 0 to 4 years 2006 2021 Change 

Map 

num 

Area 

number % of total 

pop 


pop 

2006 to 

2016 

1 Atwell 897 12.6 744 8.6 -153 

2 Aubin Grove - Banjup 112 6.3 699 7.6 587 

3 Beeliar 464 10.3 731 9.0 267 

4 Bibra Lake 410 6.4 429 6.6 19 

5 Coogee - North Coogee 233 5.4 466 4.7 233 

6 Coolbellup 296 5.8 340 6.6 44 

7 Hamilton Hill 554 5.6 619 5.9 65 

8 

Hammond Park - Wattleup - 

Henderson 

143 7.0 749 9.2 606 

9 Jandakot 186 6.4 147 5.2 -39 

10 Leeming 80 3.5 70 3.5 -10 

11 Munster 142 4.3 276 5.6 134 

12 North Lake 84 6.3 71 5.1 -13 

13 

South Lake - Cockburn 

Central 

home | return to City of Cockburn website 

416 6.6 668 7.5 252 

1 of 2 2/02/2010 11:41 AM



Map 

num 

Area 


pop 


pop 

2006 to 

2016 

14 Spearwood 478 5.0 608 5.7 130 

15 Success 483 9.6 1,031 9.5 548 

16 Yangebup 416 6.5 554 6.8 138 

The data in this site was last reviewed and updated on Thursday, 5 November 2009. 

DISCLAIMER: Whilst all due care has been taken to ensure the content of this website is 

accurate and current, there may be errors or omissions in it and no legal responsibility is accepted for 

the information and opinions in this report. In addition, as the website is based on historic information 

which is subject to revision, we do not guarantee its currency. 

This information resource is delivered and maintained by .id, specialists in demographic and economic 

profiling and forecasting. 

Copyright © .id 2010 

forecast.id is a registered trademark of .id consulting pty ltd 

top of page 



Population forecasts 


Select an area 

What are our 

assumptions? 

How many will live here? 

How old will we be? 

How will we live? 

How did we do the 

forecasts? 

Map of City of Cockburn 

Reports 

Site and data info 

Staff access 


Key age specific results 

0 to 4 year olds 5 to 11 year olds 55 to 74 year olds 75 years and over 

5-11 years: The 

maps and table 

show the proportion 

of 5-11 year olds in 

all small areas of 

the City of Cockburn 

and the forecast 

change in the 

number between 

2006 and 2021. The 

most significant 

concentrations of 

primary-school aged 

were in the small 

areas of Atwell, 

Aubin-Grove-Banjup 

and Beeliar, while 

the older suburbs of 

Hamilton Hill, 

Spearwood and 

Coolbellup are areas 

that featured lower 

shares of persons in 

this age group. The 

Children aged 5 to 11 years 

2021 (numbers) 

Numbers on the map 

correspond to the 

small area names in 

the table below. Click 

an area on the map 

to view its name. 

Print page 

Change the map data 

reasons for this different distribution reflect the era of development of the different areas. 

By 2021, substantial increases are expected in Aubin-Grove-Banjup, Success and Hammond 

Park-Wattleup-Henderson, and to a lesser extent, Coogee-North Coogee and Beeliar. This 

growth reflects where future development is likely to take place, providing residential 

opportunities for families. By contrast, a large number of older or developed suburbs are 

expected to remain relatively stable, with a decreasing share of primary-school aged children as 

the population ages, or because they have traditionally attracted older households. These areas 

include Leeming, Coolbellup, Jandakot and Bibra Lake. 


Map 

num 

Area 


pop 


pop 

2006 to 

2021 

1 Atwell 1,073 15.0 1,063 12.3 -10 

2 Aubin Grove - Banjup 220 12.4 1,045 11.4 825 

3 Beeliar 537 11.9 870 10.7 333 

4 Bibra Lake 640 10.0 613 9.4 -27 

5 Coogee - North Coogee 468 10.9 814 8.2 346 

6 Coolbellup 423 8.3 384 7.4 -39 

7 Hamilton Hill 702 7.1 750 7.1 48 

8 

Hammond Park - Wattleup - 

Henderson 

192 9.4 957 11.7 765 

9 Jandakot 243 8.4 206 7.3 -37 

10 Leeming 217 9.4 121 6.0 -96 

11 Munster 340 10.3 388 7.8 48 

12 North Lake 118 8.8 105 7.6 -13 

13 

South Lake - Cockburn 

Central 

home | return to City of Cockburn website 

604 9.6 732 8.2 128 




Map 

num 

Area 


pop 


pop 

2006 to 

2021 

14 Spearwood 722 7.5 765 7.2 43 

15 Success 503 10.0 1,282 11.8 779 

16 Yangebup 703 11.0 747 9.2 44 

The data in this site was last reviewed and updated on Thursday, 5 November 2009. 

DISCLAIMER: Whilst all due care has been taken to ensure the content of this website is 

accurate and current, there may be errors or omissions in it and no legal responsibility is accepted for 

the information and opinions in this report. In addition, as the website is based on historic information 

which is subject to revision, we do not guarantee its currency. 

This information resource is delivered and maintained by .id, specialists in demographic and economic 

profiling and forecasting. 

Copyright © .id 2010 

forecast.id is a registered trademark of .id consulting pty ltd 

top of page 


Attachment 4 

List of Children’s Services in the City of Cockburn 

Name of service Address 

CHILD CARE CENTRES 

ABC Atwell Learning Centre 1 Reynardson Avenue, Atwell 

ABC Learning Jandakot 2 Muriel Court Jandakot 

ABC Learning Jandakot West 257 Hammond Road Jandakot 

Adventure Club Child Care 

The Lakes Shopping Centre 

North Lake Rd, South Lake 

Buggles Child Care Centre Coolbellup 2/80 Coolbellup Avenue, Coolbellup 

Buggles Child Care Centre South Lake 5 Rimmington Court, South Lake 

Buggles Child Care Centre Spearwood 6 Barrington Street, Spearwood 

Early Learning Centre 157 Rockingham Road, Hamilton Hill 

Glen Iris Child Care Centre Lot 20 Berrigan Drive Jandakot 

Kids Corner Child Care Centre 190 Beeliar Drive, Munster 

Little Woodpeckers Child Care Centre 267 Rockingham Road, Spearwood 

Lollipops Child Care Centre 504 Rockingham Road, Munster 

Montessori Stepping Stones 332 Yangebup Road, Yangebup 

South Lake Child Care Centre 2 South Lake Drive South Lake 

Stepping Stones Play & Learn Centre 4 Bluebush Ave, Beeliar 

Teddy Bear Corner 79 Winterfold Road, Hamilton Hill 

OCCASIONAL CHILD CARE 

Little Jitters Occasional Child Care 29 Port Kembla Drive, Bibra Lake 

Yangebup Occasional Care 11 Dunraven Drive, Yangebup 

24 HOURS/DAY CHILD CARE 

Melville Day Care Centre 39 Rome Rd, Melville 

OUT OF SCHOOL HOURS CARE 

City of Cockburn OSHC main office 90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

Atwell Community Centre 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

Atwell/Harvest Lakes After School/Vac Harvest Lakes Community Centre, Aurora Drive, 

Care 

Atwell 

Before and After School Care 

After School/Vac Care, Spearwood 

Cnr Mason Court & Elderberry Drive, Bibra Lake 

Primary School 

After School/Vac Care, Yangebup 

Gerald Road, Spearwood 

Community Centre Swallow Drive, Yangebup 

Bibra Lake Private Kindergarten Corner Hope Rd & Homestead Ave, Bibra Lake 

FAMILY DAY CARE 

City of Cockburn Family Day Care Program 90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup

IN‐HOME CARE 

City of Cockburn In Home Care Program 90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

PLAY GROUPS 

Bibra Lake Playgroup Bibra Lake Community Centre, Bibra Lake 

Atwell 3 Year Old Playclub Atwell Community Centre, 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

Atwell Playgroup Inc Atwell Community Centre, 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

Harvest Lakes Community Centre, Aurora Drive, 

Harvest Lakes Playgroup 

Mater Christi Playgroup 

Atwell 

Yangebup Community Centre, Swallow Drive, 

Yangebup 

Meve Munchkins Atwell Community Centre, 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

South Lake Ottey Family & Neighbourhood Centre, 

Mighty Kulungas 

2A South Lake Drive South Lake 

Play Factory Incorporated Playgroup Santich Park ‐ 19 Beckett Close, Munster 

Southern Suburbs Playgroup Ethel Cooper Kindy‐ Ingram Street, Hamilton Hill 

Yangebup Family Centre, 11 Dunraven Drive, 

Yangebup Playgroup 

Yangebup 

PLAY CLUBS 


Yangebup 3 Year old Playclub 

Yangebup 

Atwell 3 Year old Playclub Atwell Community Centre. 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

FAMILY CENTRES 

South Lake Ottey Family & 

Neighbourhood Centre 2A South Lake Drive South Lake 

Yangebup Family Centre 11 Dunraven Drive, Yangebup 

DISABILITY SERVICES 

Disability Access and Inclusion Officer City of Cockburn, 9 Coleville Crescent, Spearwood 

Kwobarup ‐ Community Care for Aboriginal People, 

Jean Willis Centre 

Cnr Ingram Street and Healy Road, Hamilton Hill 

Volunteer Home Support Inc. 6 Mooney Place, O'Connor 

National Industry Association for Disability Services, 

National Disability Services 

1/59 Walters Drive, Osborne Park 

Local Area Coordination, Unit 6, 752 North Lake 

Road, 

Disability Services Commission 

South Lake 

TOY LIBRARIES 

Cockburn Toy Library 27 March Street Spearwood 

Atwell Toy Library 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

South Lake Ottey Centre Toy library 2A South Lake Drive, South Lake

PRE‐KINDY'S, KINDERGARTEN, PRE SCHOOL & PRIMARY SCHOOLS 


Atwell Pre‐Kindy 

Atwell 

Atwell Primary` 160 Lydon Boulevard, Atwell 

Beeliar Primary School 86 The Grange, Beeliar 

Bibra Lake Primary 29 Annois Road, Bibra Lake 

Bibra Lake Private Kindy 4 Homestead Ave, Bibra Lake, WA 

Blue Gum Montessori School 11 Hope Rd cnr Bibra Dr Bibra Lake 

Coogee Primary 22 Mayor Road, Coogee 

Coolbellup Community School 15 Waverley Road, Coolbellup 

Coolbellup Learning Centre 15 Waverley Road, Coolbellup 

Divine Mercy College Inc 326 Yangebup Road, Yangebup 

East Hamilton Hill Primary 27 Bradbury Road, Hamilton Hill 

Harmony Primary School Aurora Drive Atwell 

Jandakot Primary 53 Baningan Avenue, Success 

Kerry Street Community School 20 Forrest Road, Hamilton Hill 

Kim Beazley Learning Centre 390 Wentworth Parade, Success 

Mater Christi Catholic Primary School 340 Yangebup Road Yangebup 

New Life Christian College 110 Rockingham Road, Hamilton Hill 

Newton Primary 4 Marvell Avenue, Spearwood 

Perth Waldorf School 14 Gwilliam Drive, Bibra Lake 

Phoenix Primary 28 Phoenix Road, Hamilton Hill 

Pineview Community Kindergarten 30 Mopsa Way, Coolbellup 

South Coogee Primary School 40 Ivankovich Avenue Beeliar 

South Lake Primary 62 Mason Court, South Lake 

Southwell Primary 26 Grandpre Crescent, Hamilton Hill 

Spearwood Alternative Primary 370 Rockingham Road, Spearwood 

Spearwood Primary 73 Gerald Street, Spearwood 

St Jerome's Primary School 

St Jerome's Primary School ‐ 3 year old 

38 Troode Street Munster 

program 38 Troode Street Munster 

Success Primary 390 Wentworth Parade, Success 


Yangebup 3 Year Old Kindy 

Yangebup 

Yangebup Primary 55 Moorhen Drive, Yangebup 

Health Services 

Atwell Child Health Centre Atwell Community Centre, 2 Lombe Gardens Atwell 

Southwell Child Development Centre Rambures Way, Hamilton Hill 

Southwell Child Development Centre, 

Speech Therapy 162 High Street, Fremantle 

Southwell Child Development Centre, 

Occupational Therapy 1 Starling Street, Hamilton Hill 

South Lake Child Health 2A South Lake Drive, South Lake 

Success Child Health Colombus Loop, Success

Jess Thomas Centre (Spearwood) 29 March Street, Spearwood 

Jess Thomas Centre (Hamilton 

Hill/Coolbellup) 29 March Street, Spearwood 

Yangebup Child Health 11 Dunraven Drive, Yangebup 

OTHER SERVICES 

Cockburn Early Years Program 

Children's Services Officer, City of 

90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

Cockburn City of Cockburn, 9 Coleville Crescent, Spearwood 

Atwell Guides Atwell Community Centre, 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

Beeliar Community Centre, 33 Lakefront Drive, 

Beeliar Hub 

Beeliar 

BUSTER THE FUN BUS 

Cockburn Kids Newsletter (City of 

Meets in parks 

Cockburn) Quarterly, Hello Baby database & Service providers 

Coolbellup Community Hub 90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

SW Early Years Metro Interest Group Co‐ordinating group for Early Years interest, 

(SWEYMIG) 

cross‐sectoral & LGA 

Family Support Service Atwell 1 Lombe Gardens Atwell 

Family Support Service Coolbellup 90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

FUNKY FITNESS Sports & Dance Program Beeliar Community Centre. 33 Lakefront Ave, Beeliar 

Atwell Community Centre, 1 Lombe Gardens, Atwell 

Beeliar Community Centre, 33 Lakefront Drive, 

Kindy Dance Time 

Beeliar 


Kumon 

Atwell 

Pram James/Story time 

Sing & Play (City of Cockburn Early Years 

Success, Spearwood and Coolbellup Libraries 

Program) 

Nurture (Young Mums Group) City of 

90 Cordelia Ave, Coolbellup 

Cockburn Youth Services Youth Centre, 25 Wentworth Parade, Success 

EVENTS 

HELLO BABY Annual, City of Cockburn 

TEDDY BEARS PICNIC Annual, City of Cockburn 

CELEBRATING ABILITY Annual, City of Cockburn

Attachment 5 

Documents and websites reviewed as research for the Plan 

o “Children can fall behind as early as nine months ‐ Study of 15,000 children finds significant 

correlation between performance at nine months and five years”; Warwick Mansell, The 

Guardian 17 February 2010 

o ‘A Strategic Assessment of the Children’s Services Industry ‘; Report to the Children’s 

Services Subcommittee of the Community and Disability Services Ministers Advisory 

Council; South Australia 2009 

o ‘Caring for the future growing up today – participation guidelines for involving children and 

young people’; WA Commissioner for Children and Young People, 2009 

o ‘Children First’; NSW website ‐ 2009 

o Communities for Children ‐ Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and 

Indigenous Affairs – 2009 

o ‘Connected Communities Project ‐ Community centre setting and social determinants of 

health’; Centre for the Built Environment and Health, UWA, Final report 2009 

o Department for Communities ‐ demographics for Cockburn LGA, 0‐4 years and 5‐14 years ‐ 

2009 

o ‘Policy Overview ‐ Regulation Impact Statement Early Childhood Development’; 2009 

Department of Employment, Education and Workplace Relations – Early Childhood 

Development Steering Committee 

o ‘National Early Childhood Development Strategy ‐ Early Years Learning Framework , National 

Quality Framework’; website– 2009; Department of Employment, Education and Workplace 

Relations 

o ‘Disability Update’ – Disability Services Commission ‐ March 2010 

o ‘Inquiry into the adequacy of services to meet the developmental needs of Western 

Australia’s children’; Community Development and Justice Standing Committee – 2009 

o Key demographic indicators of 0‐19 year olds, Perth WA – Child and Adolescent Health, 2008 

o My Child – Early Years Learning Framework; Australian Early Development Index – 2009 

o New Income Management ‐ Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and 

Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) website ‐2009

o ‘No wrong door, first door, right door’ – Victoria Department of Health website – 2009 

o ‘Protecting Children is Everyone’s Business – National Framework for Protecting Australia’s 

Children’ – Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs 

(FaHCSIA) ‐ 2009 

o WA Commissioner for Children and Young People: Strategic Directions 2009 ‐2012 

o WA Department of Education – Office of Early Childhood Development and Learning 

o City of Cockburn documents/website: www.cockburn.wa.gov.au 

- A Plan for the District 2008-2018 

- Business Plan 2009‐10 

- Catalyse Community Needs Survey‐ 2008 

- Children Services Plan ‘Our Children, Our Future; a Ten Year Plan’ (May 2001) 

- Cockburn Disability Access & Inclusion Plan 2007‐2012 

- Cockburn Kids – children’s services newsletter, Term 3 2009 

- Community services handbook 

- Disability Reference Group, After School and Vacation needs of children with a 

disability –2010 

- Population projections 

- Services Support Team, Strategic Directions 2008‐2011 

- Sport and Recreation Strategic Plan – 2009 

- Strategic Plan 2006 – 2016 

- Sustainability Policy 2006

Please share with us details of any 

new groups which you are part of. 

Name............................................................ 

Address......................................................... 

...................................................................... 

Phone............................................................ 

What service does the group provide, 

eg playgroup. 

..................................................................... 

…………………………………………………………………. 

Please tell us....... 

1 What children’s services in Cockburn are you 

currently using? Eg playground, child care, library, 

out of school care, Early Years program, Youth 

Centre etc? 

........................................................................... 

.......................................................................... 

………………………………………………………………………. 

………………………………………………………………………. 

2. How well do they meet your needs? 

........................................................................... 

........................................................................... 

………………………………………………………………………. 

3. What children’s services do you think need to be 

provided, which are currently not available? 

........................................................................... 

........................................................................... 

………………………………………………………………………. 

………………………………………………………………………. 

………………………………………………………………………. 

4. Where should these services be based? 

.......................................................................... 

5. Any other comments? 

.......................................................................... 

.......................................................................... 

………………………………………………………………………. 

Children’s Services 

in Cockburn 

PRESENT & FUTURE 

Are we doing it right? 

Let’s find out....... TOGETHER

A review of Children’s Services within the City of 

Cockburn is now underway. 

The result will be a 5 year plan that will provide 

the direction for improvement of services for 

children from 0 to 12 years of age within the 

Cockburn area. 

We are finding out what is currently being done 

well, what services need to be enhanced, and what 

are the new services required by children and 

families over the next five years. 

Helen Grzyb and Associates has been appointed by 

the City of Cockburn to complete the plan. 

What we want to achieve is to identify the best 

solutions for the provision of a range of children’s 

services. 

The City already provides before and after school 

care, vacation programs, a family day care scheme, 

the Early Years home‐visiting program, 3 Year old 

Playclub, support for Child Health services, Toy 

Library and Play Groups, parenting support, a 

Youth Centre, and events such as ‘Hello Baby’ & 

‘Teddy Bears Picnic’. 

We are interested in what parents, children, 

service providers and people in the community 

have to say, and will be out and about across 

Cockburn in February 2010 to talk with you. 

Our consultants will be at the following places and 

you can chat with us there: 

• Pram Jams at Spearwood Library on 

Thursday 4 February around 10.30am 

• Gateway Shopping Centre Tuesday 9 

February at 9am (in the food hall) 

• South Lake Ottey Family and 

Neighbourhood Centre on Tuesday 16 

February from 9am to 11am. 

Alternatively you can contact our consultant Dr 

Helen Grzyb by phone 9388 1330, fax 9388 1440, 

mobile 0411722613 to email 

helengrzyb@westnet.com.au and let her know 

what you think. 

You can also provide your thoughts through the 

consultation page on the City of Cockburn website 

at www.cockburn.wa.gov.au 

We would like to hear about what services 

you are currently using and how you like 

them. Also we would like to hear from you 

about new ideas or changes to services 

which you think should be provided for 

children aged 0‐12 and their parents in 


We welcome comment from anyone in the 

community or from people who provide 

services – eg; from not‐for‐ profit 

organisations through to parent‐run 

Playgroups, and residents. 

If you would like to have a say about the 

way services are provided for children in 

the Cockburn area, then please phone, fax 

or email Helen. 

By letting us know about these services we 

can gain a better picture of what’s on offer 

across Cockburn, and where the gaps are. 

A reply paid envelope is also provided to 

send in your written comments.

Attachment 7 

Questionnaire for City of Cockburn staff: 

Name: Position: 

1. What do you see are the strategic issues relating to children’s services (aged 0‐12) in 

the next five years? 

2. Have you identified any gaps in children’s services which we need to consider over 

the next five years? 

3. How do you see the liaison between children’s services and your area would best be 

undertaken to keep informed about changing issues and priorities? 

4. What are the future changes you are planning to meet the needs of the changing 

population across Cockburn, particularly children 0‐12 

5. Does your area have any strategies to address the needs of indigenous children 0‐12 

6. Does your area have any strategies to address the needs of CALD children 0‐12 

7. Are there any evaluations or reviews of your program area which you think would be 

helpful for us to see as background to the development of the Children’s services 

five year plan?

Children's Services Strategic Plan 2010 - 2015 - City of Cockburn

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?