Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
In addition to time allocation measures and microenvironmental<br />
parameters, information on the intensity of contact is needed to<br />
assess exposure. Here the focus is on micro-level activities that<br />
affect the rate of contact with the contaminated media while the<br />
person is in a certain microenvironment (e.g., outdoors at home) and<br />
performing a specific activity (e.g., cleaning). The potential for<br />
dermal contact depends upon the surface area of exposed skin, thus<br />
clothing type and fabric consistency as well as the size of the<br />
person, whether the individual is sitting, crawling, kneeling or using<br />
their hands on the contaminated surface, or otherwise handling the<br />
contaminant. In addition, exposure for the given event depends upon<br />
the duration and frequency of each contact between the exposed skin<br />
and the contaminated media; e.g., 50 1-min contacts between the<br />
person's hand and the floor while cleaning. As described in Chapter 7,<br />
dietary factors, including the type of foods that are consumed and the<br />
amount consumed per time period of interest, are the most obvious.<br />
Concern also has been raised about the potential for contamination of<br />
foods from contact with surfaces during storage, preparation and<br />
consumption (Berry, 1992, Freeman et al., 1997). Hand-mouth and<br />
object-mouth contact, although difficult to measure, may be one of the<br />
most important routes of exposure to contaminants such as pesticides<br />
and lead that reside in house dust, especially in children (Charney et<br />
al., 1980; Rabinowitz & Bellinger, 1988; Davies et al., 1990). For<br />
pollutants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the<br />
intensity of contact is influenced by one's level of exertion (often<br />
referred to as "activity level"). Breathing rate or heart rate is<br />
needed to predict dose (the amount of contaminant that enters the<br />
body), thereby producing a more accurate estimate of the resulting<br />
health effects.<br />
Finally, depending on the purpose of the exposure assessment, the<br />
required temporal resolution of the time-activity data may vary<br />
substantially. Whereas short-term time-activity patterns may be<br />
important for acute exposures, long-term average time-activity<br />
patterns may be more relevant in other circumstances. If long-term<br />
exposure is of major interest, e.g., over years or lifetime,<br />
residential history is an important information to assign respective<br />
ambient monitor data for the entire period of interest (Künzli et al.,<br />
1996).<br />
5.2.2 Surrogates of time-activity patterns<br />
For many exposures surrogates of time-activity patterns may be<br />
developed on the basis of generalizations about the activities of<br />
people at a particular time, who live in a specific geographic<br />
location or who share a specific set of living conditions. Usually the<br />
most important time-activity surrogate is age group. Some activities<br />
that are useful for predicting exposure to air pollutants, such as<br />
distance and timing of travel or duration of work and its locations,<br />
also show systematic differences in their frequency and duration by<br />
demographic characteristics. For instance, Schwab et al. (1990)<br />
documents how time in the kitchen, which influences exposure to<br />
combustion products, is greater among women in the USA than among men,<br />
even after adjusting for whether the woman works outside the home;<br />
likewise, men spend more time in transit, regardless of their age or<br />
employment status. It is likely that the frequency of contact with a<br />
wide variety of toxins differs across groups defined by gender and<br />
age, owing to traditional divisions of labour in many cultures.<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 84 of 284<br />
6/1/2007