Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
population that the sample is designed to represent (Kish, 1965). For<br />
these studies, one needs to (Sexton & Ryan, 1988):<br />
* choose a population for investigation<br />
* choose an appropriate unit for sampling and analysis (e.g., person,<br />
household, neighbourhood, city, etc.)<br />
* stratify as appropriate<br />
* choose a sampling strategy (e.g., simple random sampling,<br />
multistage sampling).<br />
The results of a probability survey can be used to make general<br />
statements about the population under investigation. The advantages<br />
include having results that represent the population, taking into<br />
account the possible error due to sampling. The disadvantages of this<br />
scheme lie in the complicated sample selection, difficulty in<br />
maintaining compliance from participants and the potentially complex<br />
statistical analysis. In addition, randomized surveys of insufficient<br />
sample size may miss rare hazardous events or small populations with<br />
high exposure or risk.<br />
Sampling strategies for survey studies include randomization<br />
methods for choosing subjects to enroll in the study. Simple random<br />
sampling is a scheme in which all sampling units of the same size have<br />
equal probability of being selected. It can be difficult to implement<br />
but relatively easy to generalize. Simple random sampling presents<br />
logistic and fiscal constraints when considered for exposure surveys<br />
that are large in geographic scope. For example, a national survey of<br />
5000 personal exposures to respirable particulate matter that utilizes<br />
simple random sampling may result in individuals selected from 1000<br />
cities and towns. The travel and site preparation costs of such a<br />
design may not be feasible in many situations.<br />
A variety of alternatives to simple random sampling exist that<br />
may be used to provide practical and efficient samples of large<br />
populations (Callahan et al., 1995). Stratified sampling may be used<br />
to obtain more precise survey results if exposures are more<br />
homogeneous within strata than between them. Possible strata include<br />
urban, suburban and rural populations, or occupationally exposed and<br />
non-occupationally exposed individuals.<br />
Oversampling of target populations or contaminants also may<br />
yield substantial increases in the precision of results. Because the<br />
individuals anticipated to have the highest exposures to a particular<br />
pollutant may be rare in the population being studied, oversampling<br />
can be considered to obtain more precise estimates of exposure. Before<br />
committing substantial resources to oversampling, special care must be<br />
taken to ensure that assumptions or data used to support a rationale<br />
for selecting the oversampled population are accurate; otherwise<br />
erroneous oversampling may decrease the precision of the study results<br />
(Callahan et al., 1995).<br />
Multistage sampling designs utilize clusters of sampling units<br />
thereby limiting sampling locations to manageable areas. Depending on<br />
the scope of the study, the stages of probability sampling necessary<br />
may include:<br />
* selection of primary sampling unit (e.g., a city)<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 46 of 284<br />
6/1/2007