12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

population that the sample is designed to represent (Kish, 1965). For<br />

these studies, one needs to (Sexton & Ryan, 1988):<br />

* choose a population for investigation<br />

* choose an appropriate unit for sampling and analysis (e.g., person,<br />

household, neighbourhood, city, etc.)<br />

* stratify as appropriate<br />

* choose a sampling strategy (e.g., simple random sampling,<br />

multistage sampling).<br />

The results of a probability survey can be used to make general<br />

statements about the population under investigation. The advantages<br />

include having results that represent the population, taking into<br />

account the possible error due to sampling. The disadvantages of this<br />

scheme lie in the complicated sample selection, difficulty in<br />

maintaining compliance from participants and the potentially complex<br />

statistical analysis. In addition, randomized surveys of insufficient<br />

sample size may miss rare hazardous events or small populations with<br />

high exposure or risk.<br />

Sampling strategies for survey studies include randomization<br />

methods for choosing subjects to enroll in the study. Simple random<br />

sampling is a scheme in which all sampling units of the same size have<br />

equal probability of being selected. It can be difficult to implement<br />

but relatively easy to generalize. Simple random sampling presents<br />

logistic and fiscal constraints when considered for exposure surveys<br />

that are large in geographic scope. For example, a national survey of<br />

5000 personal exposures to respirable particulate matter that utilizes<br />

simple random sampling may result in individuals selected from 1000<br />

cities and towns. The travel and site preparation costs of such a<br />

design may not be feasible in many situations.<br />

A variety of alternatives to simple random sampling exist that<br />

may be used to provide practical and efficient samples of large<br />

populations (Callahan et al., 1995). Stratified sampling may be used<br />

to obtain more precise survey results if exposures are more<br />

homogeneous within strata than between them. Possible strata include<br />

urban, suburban and rural populations, or occupationally exposed and<br />

non-occupationally exposed individuals.<br />

Oversampling of target populations or contaminants also may<br />

yield substantial increases in the precision of results. Because the<br />

individuals anticipated to have the highest exposures to a particular<br />

pollutant may be rare in the population being studied, oversampling<br />

can be considered to obtain more precise estimates of exposure. Before<br />

committing substantial resources to oversampling, special care must be<br />

taken to ensure that assumptions or data used to support a rationale<br />

for selecting the oversampled population are accurate; otherwise<br />

erroneous oversampling may decrease the precision of the study results<br />

(Callahan et al., 1995).<br />

Multistage sampling designs utilize clusters of sampling units<br />

thereby limiting sampling locations to manageable areas. Depending on<br />

the scope of the study, the stages of probability sampling necessary<br />

may include:<br />

* selection of primary sampling unit (e.g., a city)<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 46 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!