Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
small town in southwestern Australia. The many potential populations<br />
of interest which this sample might generalize include: all people<br />
living in that town; people living in a small southwestern Australia<br />
town; people living in southwestern Australia; people living in<br />
Australia; people living in any small town; people in general. In this<br />
case, the sample population is not likely to provide a representative<br />
sample of the latter two populations.<br />
The appropriateness of the generalization is determined by<br />
considering if the sample is randomly selected in such a way as to be<br />
representative of the larger population of interest (Whitmore, 1988).<br />
This randomization is in terms of the distribution of the collected<br />
data. For continuous outcomes, the percentages of key attributes, such<br />
as demographic factors, should be similar between the sample and the<br />
population. However, when this is not possible, owing to limited<br />
funding for example, a descriptive study (described below) can provide<br />
credible data, although the extent to which these can be generalized<br />
is limited.<br />
3.4 Types of study design<br />
Once the population is defined, then the attention shifts to<br />
sampling strategies; in particular, comprehensive samples, probability<br />
samples, and other types of samples. A comprehensive sample includes<br />
all members of the selected population. In a probability sample each<br />
member has a known likelihood of being selected. Simple random<br />
sampling is a special case where each member of the population has<br />
an equal probability of being selected. Other types of study groups<br />
are selected on the basis of other characteristics, such as<br />
availability or convenience.<br />
3.4.1 Comprehensive samples<br />
Complete populations can be used to collect a full picture of the<br />
process being studied, especially when the total population is<br />
relatively small such as families in a neighbourhood. In these cases,<br />
an exhaustive collection of measurements is taken from every potential<br />
subject, and the completed data describe the situation exactly. There<br />
is no sample variability except through the methods and procedures<br />
used for measurement and monitoring. The main reasons for studies of<br />
this nature are either a small population size, a need for a complete<br />
evaluation of the problem, high potential risk, high variability among<br />
units or legal requirements. The advantages of this type of study are<br />
that a complete description of the exposure is given, and there is no<br />
need for generalization because all potential subjects are covered.<br />
The disadvantage of this approach, if the population is large, lies in<br />
the expense: all individuals in all locations must be monitored at all<br />
times.<br />
3.4.2 Probability samples<br />
Surveys consist of a random sampling of subjects from the<br />
population of interest. This approach aims to remove selection bias<br />
and is useful for generalizing results beyond the study sample. It is<br />
important to distinguish that "random" does not translate to<br />
"haphazard". A truly random sample is independent of human judgement.<br />
Every unit in the total population has a known above-zero likelihood<br />
of being included in the sample. Effective study design allows<br />
researchers to draw statistically valid inferences about the general<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 45 of 284<br />
6/1/2007