12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

Conceptually, as shown in Fig. 8, estimating and prioritizing<br />

health risks are seemingly straightforward. Risk is a combination of<br />

effects estimates, where "highest" priorities can be thought of as<br />

those that entail both "high" toxicity for the agent of interest<br />

(adverse effects are likely to occur in humans at relatively low<br />

exposures or doses), and "high" exposures for the population,<br />

subpopulation or individuals of interest (exposures or doses are above<br />

a health-based standard). Conversely, "lowest" priority risks involve<br />

"low" toxicity and "low" exposures. "Medium" priority risks are those<br />

for which either toxicity or exposure is "low" while the other is<br />

"high" (Sexton, 1993). The Windsor Air Quality Study, for example,<br />

showed that incinerator emissions contributed little to total human<br />

exposure for VOCs. Despite the fact that the pollutants were of high<br />

toxicity, incinerator emissions were considered to be of relatively<br />

low risk to the population. In contrast, studies show that second-hand<br />

smoke has both high toxicity and high human exposures, and should<br />

therefore be identified as a high priority risk.<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 38 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!