Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
the ideal, they are very costly; decisions therefore need to be made<br />
on the most important elements for inclusion. For any study, the<br />
purpose must first be defined. Possible purposes include environmental<br />
epidemiology, risk assessment, risk management or status and trend<br />
analysis (see Chapter 2). The data elements and measuring approaches<br />
that are needed for this purpose are then determined. Table 3<br />
summarizes the basic information that is required for each study. It<br />
should be mentioned that different elements of the exposure assessment<br />
framework might be selected to meet different study requirements.<br />
Table 3. Basic information needed for exposure assessments in<br />
different contexts<br />
Information required<br />
Risk assessment Point estimates or distributions of<br />
exposure and dose<br />
Duration of exposure and dose<br />
Risk management Pollutant source contributing to<br />
(conducted once hazard exposure and dose<br />
is identified) Personal activities contributing<br />
to exposure and dose<br />
Effectiveness of intervention measures<br />
Status and trend Change of exposure and dose of<br />
populations over time<br />
Epidemiology Individual and population exposures and<br />
doses, exposure dose categories<br />
1.4 Approaches to quantitative exposure assessment<br />
Quantitative estimation of exposure is often the central feature<br />
of assessment activities. The quantitative estimation of exposure can<br />
be approached in two general ways: direct assessment, including<br />
point-of-contact measurements and biological indicators of exposure;<br />
and indirect assessment, including environmental monitoring,<br />
modelling, questionnaires (US NRC, 1991b) (see Chapter 3.5). These two<br />
generic approaches to quantitative estimation of exposure are<br />
independent and complementary. Each relies on different kinds of data<br />
and has different strengths and weaknesses. It is potentially useful,<br />
therefore, to employ multiple approaches as a way of checking the<br />
robustness of results. Among other factors, the choice of which method<br />
to use will depend on the purpose of the assessment and the<br />
availability of suitable methods, measurements and models.<br />
Direct approaches for air, water and food include personal air<br />
monitors, measurements of water at the point of use and measurement of<br />
the food being consumed. Indirect approaches include<br />
microenvironmental air monitoring and measurements of the water supply<br />
and food supply (contents of a typical food basket, for instance).<br />
Exposure models are constructed to assess or predict personal<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 29 of 284<br />
6/1/2007