12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

the ideal, they are very costly; decisions therefore need to be made<br />

on the most important elements for inclusion. For any study, the<br />

purpose must first be defined. Possible purposes include environmental<br />

epidemiology, risk assessment, risk management or status and trend<br />

analysis (see Chapter 2). The data elements and measuring approaches<br />

that are needed for this purpose are then determined. Table 3<br />

summarizes the basic information that is required for each study. It<br />

should be mentioned that different elements of the exposure assessment<br />

framework might be selected to meet different study requirements.<br />

Table 3. Basic information needed for exposure assessments in<br />

different contexts<br />

Information required<br />

Risk assessment Point estimates or distributions of<br />

exposure and dose<br />

Duration of exposure and dose<br />

Risk management Pollutant source contributing to<br />

(conducted once hazard exposure and dose<br />

is identified) Personal activities contributing<br />

to exposure and dose<br />

Effectiveness of intervention measures<br />

Status and trend Change of exposure and dose of<br />

populations over time<br />

Epidemiology Individual and population exposures and<br />

doses, exposure dose categories<br />

1.4 Approaches to quantitative exposure assessment<br />

Quantitative estimation of exposure is often the central feature<br />

of assessment activities. The quantitative estimation of exposure can<br />

be approached in two general ways: direct assessment, including<br />

point-of-contact measurements and biological indicators of exposure;<br />

and indirect assessment, including environmental monitoring,<br />

modelling, questionnaires (US NRC, 1991b) (see Chapter 3.5). These two<br />

generic approaches to quantitative estimation of exposure are<br />

independent and complementary. Each relies on different kinds of data<br />

and has different strengths and weaknesses. It is potentially useful,<br />

therefore, to employ multiple approaches as a way of checking the<br />

robustness of results. Among other factors, the choice of which method<br />

to use will depend on the purpose of the assessment and the<br />

availability of suitable methods, measurements and models.<br />

Direct approaches for air, water and food include personal air<br />

monitors, measurements of water at the point of use and measurement of<br />

the food being consumed. Indirect approaches include<br />

microenvironmental air monitoring and measurements of the water supply<br />

and food supply (contents of a typical food basket, for instance).<br />

Exposure models are constructed to assess or predict personal<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 29 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!