Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Schwab M, McDermott A, & Spengler JD (1992) Using longitudinal data to understand children's activity patterns in an exposure context: Data from the Kanawha Valley Health Study. Environ Int, 18: 173-189. Seiler F (1987) Error propagation for large errors. Risk Anal, 7(4): 509-518. Sexton K (1992) The role of scientific research in risk assessment and risk management decisions. Otolarnygol Head Neck Surg, 106(6): 635-641. Sexton K (1993) An introduction to risk-based priority setting: Toward a conceptual framework for analysis. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Comparative Risk Analysis and Priority Setting of Air Pollution Issues, Keystone, CO, June 1993. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Air and Waste Management Association Sexton K & Ryan PB (1988) Assessment of human exposure to air pollution: Methods, measurements, and models. In: Watson AY, Bates RR, & Kennedy D ed. Air pollution, the automobile, and public health. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Health Effects Institute. Sexton K, Selevan SG, Wagener DK, & Lybarger JA (1992) Estimating human exposures to environmental pollutants: Availability and utility of existing databases. Arch Environ Health, 47(6): 398-407. Sexton K, Olden K, & Johnson BL (1993) "Environmental justice": The central role of research in establishing a credible scientific basis for informed decision making. Toxicol Ind Hyg, 9: 685-727. Sexton K, Wagener DK, Selevan SG, Miller TO, & Lybarger JA (1994) An inventory of human exposure-related data bases. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 4(1): 95-109. Sexton K, Callahan MA, & Ryan EF (1995a) Estimating exposure and dose to characterize health risks: the role of human tissue monitoring in exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect, 103(suppl 3): 13-29. Sexton K, Callahan MA, Ryan EF, Saint CG, &Wood WP (1995b) Informed decisions about protecting and promoting public health: rationale for a national human exposure assessment survey. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 5(3): 233-256. Sexton K, Kleffman D, & Callahan M (1995c) An introduction to the national human exposure assessment survey and related phase I field studies. J. Expo Anal. Environ Epidemiol, 5: 229-232. Shamoo DA, Johnson TR, Trim SC, Little DE, Linn WS, & Hackney JD (1991) Activity patterns in a panel of outdoor workers exposed to oxidant pollution. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 1(4): 423-428. Shealy DB, Barr JR, Ashley DL, Patterson DG Jr, Camann DE, & Bond AE (1997) Correlation of environmental carbaryl measurements with serum and urinary 1-naphthol measurements in a farmer applicator and his family. Environ Health Perspect, 105(5): 510-513. Sikorski R, Paszkowski T, Radomanski T, Niewiadowska A, & Semeniuk S (1990) Human colostrum as a source of organohalogen xenobiotics for a breast-fed neonate. Reprod Toxicol, 4: 17-20. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 260 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergeld EK (1991) Lead in bone: Implications for toxicology during pregnancy and lactation. Environ Health Perspect, 91: 63-70. Silbergeld EK (1993) New approaches to monitoring environmental neurotoxins. Ann NY Acad Sci, 694: 62-71. Silbergeld EK & Davis DL (1994) Role of biomarkers in indexing and understanding environmentally induced disease. Clin Chem, 40: 1363-1367. Silvers A, Florence BT, Rourke DL, & Lorimor RJ (1994) How children spend their time: A sample survey for use in exposure and risk assessments. Soc Risk Anal, 14: 931-944. Sim MR & McNeil JJ (1992) Monitoring chemical exposure using breast milk: A methodological review. Am J Epidemiol, 136: 1-11. Simcox NJ, Fenske RA, Wolz SA, Lee I, & Kalman DA (1995) Pesticides in household dust and soil: Exposure pathways for children of agricultural families. Environ Health Perspect, 103(12): 1126-1134. Simonich SL & Hites RA (1997) Relationships between socioeconomic indicators and concentrations of organochlorine pesticides in tree bark. Environ Sci Technol, 31(4): 999-1003. Skog K, Solyakov A, Arvidsson P, & Jagerstad M (1998) Analysis of nonpolar heterocyclic amines in cooked foods and meat extracts using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr, A803(1-2): 227-233. Slorach SA & Vaz R (1983) Assessment of human exposure to selected organochlorine compounds through biological monitoring -- Report prepared for UNEP/WHO. Uppsala, Sweden, National Food Administration. Smith KR (1995) Global environmental epidemiology network -- The potential of human exposure assessment for air pollution regulation. Geneva, World Health Organization (Document WHO/EHG/95.9). Smith MT & Suk WA (1994) Application of molecular biomarkers in epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect, 102(suppl 1): 229-235. Solomon RL & Hartford JW (1976) Lead and cadmium in dusts and soils in a small urban community. Environ Sci Technol, 10: 733-777. Somervaille LJ, Chettle DR, Scott MC, Tennant DR, McKiernan MJ, Skilbeck A, & Trethowan WN (1988) In vivo tibia lead measurements as an index of cumulative exposure in occupationally exposed subjects. Br J Ind Med, 45: 174-181. Spengler JD, Dockery DW, Turner WA, Wolfson JM, & Ferris BG Jr (1981) Long-term measurements of respirable sulfates and particles inside and outside homes. Atmos Environ, 15: 23-30. Spengler JD, Treitman RD, Tosteson TD, Maye DT, & Soczer MC (1985) Personal exposures to respirable particulates and implications for air pollution epidemiology. Environ Sci Technol, 19: 700-707. Spengler JD, Schwab M, Ryan PB, Billick IH, Colome SD, & Becker E (1994) An overview of the Los Angeles personal monitoring study. J Air http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 261 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245 and 246: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?