Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Allergen levels in airborne and surface dust. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 107: 452-453. O'Rourke MK & Lebowitz (1984) A comparison of regional atmospheric pollen with pollens collected at and near homes. Grana, 23: 55-64. Osterman-Golkar S, Ehrenberg L, Segerback D, & Hallstrom I (1976) Evaluation of genetic risks of alkylating agents: II. Haemoglobin as a dose monitor. Mutat Res, 34: 1-10. Ott W (1989) In: Starks TH ed. Human activity patterns: A review of the literature for estimating time spent indoors, outdoors, and in-transit. Proceedings of the Research Planning Conference on Human Activity Patterns. Las Vegas, Nevada, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/600/4-89/004). Ott WR (1990) Total human exposure: Basic concepts -- EPA field studies, and future research needs. J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 40(7): 966-975. Ott W (1995) Environmental statistics and data analysis. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press Inc. Ott WR & Roberts JW (1998) Everyday exposure to toxic pollutants. Sci Am, 2: 1-7. Ott WR, Thomas J, Mage D, & Wallace L(1988) Validation of the simulation of human activity and pollutant exposure (SHAPE) model using paired days from the Denver, Colorado, carbon monoxide field study. Atmos Environ, 22: 2101-2113. Ozkaynak H, Xue J, Spengler JD, Wallace L, Pellizzari E, & Jenkins P (1996) Personal exposure to airborne particles and metals: results from the particle TEAM study in Riverside, California. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 6(1): 57-78. Ozolins G (1989) Global efforts to produce accurate human exposure data: the challenge ahead. In: US EPA/Air and Waste Management Association Symposium on Total Exposure Assessment Methodology. Las Vegas, Nevada, US Environmental Protection Agency, pp 11-16. Pasquill F (1961) The estimation of the dispersion of windborne material. Meteorol Mag, 90: 33-49. Pastuska JS (1988) Inertial impaction. In: Spurny K ed. Advances in aerosol filtration science. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press Inc. Patterson DG, Hoffman RE, Needham LL, Roberts DW, Bagby JR, Pirkle JL, Falk H, Sampson EJ, & Houk VN (1986) 2,3,7,8-Tetracholorodibenzo-p-dioxin levels in adipose tissue of exposed and control persons in Missouri: An interim report. J Am Med Assoc, 256: 2683-2686. Pauli G, de-Blay F, Le Mao J, & Bessot JC (1995) Importance of measuring exposure to principal indoor allergens in allergic asthma. Bull Natl Acad Med, 179(1): 67-75 (discussion 75-77). Pellizzari ED, Perritt K, Hartwell TD, Michael LC, Whitmore R, Handy RW, Smith D, & Zelon H (1987) Total exposure assessment methodology (TEAM) study: Volume II -- Elizabeth and Bayonne, New Jersey; Devils http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 254 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, North Dakota; and Greensboro, North Carolina. Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency. Pellizzari ED, Zweidinger RA, & Sheldon LS (1988) Methods for industrial and ambient monitoring: Method 4 -- Breath sampling. Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, pp 255-266 (IARC Scientific Publications No. 85). Pellizzari E, Lioy P, Quackenboss J, Whitmore R, Clayton A, Freeman N, Waldman J, Thomas K, Rhodes C, & Wilcosky T (1995) Population-based exposure measurements in EPA region 5: A phase I field study in support of the national human exposure assessment survey. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 5(3): 327-358. Pennington J (1992) The 1990 revision of the FDA total diet study. J Nutr Educ, 24 (4): 173-178. Pennington J & Gunderson EL (1987) History of the food and drug administration's total diet study-1961 to 1987. J Assoc Off Anal Chem, 70(5): 772-782. Perera FP (1987) Molecular cancer epidemiology: a new tool in cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst, 78: 887-898. Perera FP & Weinstein IB (1982) Molecular epidemiology and carcinogen-DNA adduct detection: New approaches to studies of human cancer causation. J Chron Dis, 35: 581-600. Perera FP, Hemminki K, Young TL, Brenner D, Kelly G, & Santella RM (1988) Detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in white blood cells of foundry workers. Cancer Res, 48: 2288-2291. Periago JF, Luna A, Morente A, & Zambudio A (1992) Design and evaluation of an exhaled breath sampler for biological monitoring of organic solvents. J Appl Toxicol, 12: 91-96. Phoon W, Lee HS, & Ho CK (1990) Biological monitoring of workers exposed to inorganic lead in Singapore. Singap Med J, 31(2):127-130. Pizzichini E, Pizzichini MM, Efthimiadis A, Dolovich J, & Hargreave FE (1997) Measuring airway inflammation in asthma: Eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum compared with peripheral blood. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 99(4): 539-544 Platts-Mills TAE & De Weck AL (1989) Dust mite allergens and asthma: a world wide problem. International workshop report. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 83: 416-427. Platts-Mills TAE, Hayden ML, Chapman MD, & Wilkins SR (1987) Seasonal variation in dust mite grass-pollen allergens in dust from the houses of patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 79: 781-791. Platts-Mills TAE, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, Vervloet D, & Chapman MD (1992) Dust mite allergens and asthma: report of a second international workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 89: 1046-1060. Pleil JD & Lindstrom AB (1995) Measurement of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as collected in evacuated electropolished canisters. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl, B665(2): 271-279. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 255 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245 and 246: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?