Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lehtimäki M & Willeke K (1993) Measurement methods. In: Willeke K & Baron P ed. Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp 112-129. Le Mao J, Pauli G, Tekaia F, Hoyet C, Bischoff E, & David B (1989) Guanine content and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergens in house dust samples. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 83: 926-933. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr, Klar J, & Lwanga SK (1990) Adequacy of sample size in health studies. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Lepow ML, Bruckman L, Gillette M, Markowitz S, Robino RA, & Kapish J (1975) Investigations into sources of lead in the environment of urban children. Environ Res, 10(3): 415-426. Lepow ML, Bruckman L, Rubino RA, Markowitz S, Gillette M, & Kapish J (1974) Role of airborne lead in increased body burden of lead in Hartford children. Environ Health Perspect, 7: 99-102. Leuenberger P, Schwartz J, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Blaser K, Bolognini G, Bongard JP, Brandli O, Braun P, Bron C, & Brutsche M (1994) Passive smoking exposure in adults and chronic respiratory symptoms (SAPALDIA study). Swiss study on air pollution and lung diseases in adults, SAPALDIA team. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 150: 1222-1228. Levallois P, Lavoie M, Goulet L, Nantel AJ, & Gingras S (1991) Blood lead levels in children and pregnant women living near a lead-reclamation plant. Can Med Assoc J, 144(7): 877-885. Levesque B, Ayotte P, LeBlanc A, Dewailly E, PrudHomme D, Lavoie R, Allaire S, & Levallois P (1994) Evaluation of dermal and respiratory chloroform exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect, 12: 1082-1087. Lewis RG, Fortman RC, & Camann DE (1994) Evaluation of methods for monitoring the potential exposure of small children to pesticides in the residential environment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 26: 1-10. Lichtenstein CH, Roth HD, & Wyzga RE (1989) In: Starks TH ed. An activity pattern survey for asthmatics: Proceedings of the Research Planning Conference on Human Activity Patterns. Las Vegas, Nevada, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/600/4-89/004). Lind B, Elinder C-G, Friberg L, Nilsson B, Svartengren M, & Vahter M (1987) Quality control in the analysis of lead and cadmium in blood. Fresenius Z Anal Chem, 326: 647-655 Linet MS, Hatch EE, Kleinerman RA, Robinson LL, Kaune WT, Friedman DR, Severson RK, Haines CM, Hartsock CT, Shelley N, Wacholder S, & Tarone RE (1997) Residential exposure to magnetic fields and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children.. N Engl J Med, 337(1): 1-7. Lioy PJ, Wainman T, & Weisel C (1993) A wipe sampler for the quantitative measurement of dust on smooth surfaces: Laboratory performance studies. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 3(3): 315-330. Liu L-JS, Olson MP III, Allen GA, & Koutrakis P (1994a) Evaluation of the Harvard ozone passive sampler on human subjects indoors. Environ Sci Technol, 28(5): 915-923. Liu J, Chan C, & Jeng F (1994b) Predicting personal exposure levels to http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 250 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon monoxide (CO) in Taipei, based on actual CO measurements in microenvironments and Monte Carlo simulation method. Atmos Environ, 28(14): 2361-2368. Lodge JP Jr (1988) Methods of air sampling and analysis. Boca Raton, Florida, Lewis Publishers. Luczynska CM, Li Y, Chapman MD, & Platts-Mills TAE (1990) Airborne concentrations and particle size distribution of allergen derived from domestic cats (Felis domesticus): Measurements using cascade impactor, liquid impinger, and a two-site monoclonal antibody assay for Fel d I. Am Rev Respir Dis, 141: 361-367. Lyman WJ, Reehl WF, & Rosenblatt DH (1990) Handbook of chemical property estimation methods: Environmental behavior of organic compounds. Washington, DC, American Chemical Society. McCullagh P & Nelder J (1990) Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. London, Chapman & Hall. MacIntosh DL, Suter GW, & Hoffman FO (1994) Uses of probabilistic exposure models in ecological risk assessments of contaminated sites. Risk Anal, 14(4): 405-420. MacIntosh DL, Xue J, Ozkaynak H, Spengler JD, & Ryan PB (1995) A population-based exposure model for benzene. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 5(3): 375-403. MacIntosh DL, Spengler JD, Ozkaynak H, Tsai L, & Ryan PB (1996) Dietary exposures to selected metals and pesticides. Environ Health Perspect, 104(2): 202-209. MacIntosh DL, Williams PL, Hunter DJ, Sampson LA, Morris SC, Willett WC, & Rimm EB (1997) Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire-food composition approach for estimating dietary intake of inorganic arsenic and methylmercury. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 6(12):1043-1050. Mackay D (1979) Finding fugacity feasible. Environ Sci Technol, 13: 1218-1223. Mackay D (1991) Multimedia environmental models, the fugacity approach. Chelsea, Michigan, Lewis Publishers. Mackay D & Paterson S (1981) Calculating fugacity. Environ Sci Technol, 15: 1006-1014. Mackay D & Paterson S (1982) Fugacity revisited. Environ Sci Technol, 16: 654-660. McKone TE & Layton DW (1986) Screening the potential risk of toxic substances using a multimedia compartment model: estimation of human exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 6: 359-380. McKone TE, Gratt LB, Lyon MJ, & Perry BW (1987) GEOTOX multimedia compartment model user's guide. Livermore, California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (UCRL-15913). Madden NA, Russo DC, & Cataldo MF (1980) Environmental influences of mouthing in children with lead intoxication. J Pediatr Psychol, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 251 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245 and 246: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?